使用射频针装置进行射频消融治疗静脉曲张溃疡的临床效果:非随机对照前瞻性研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1177/17085381241258192
Huanwei Wang, Jianqin Guo, Guoyong Hua, Lina Qi, Yuying Zhang, Bin Ye, Jingxin Yan, Lushun Zhang
{"title":"使用射频针装置进行射频消融治疗静脉曲张溃疡的临床效果:非随机对照前瞻性研究。","authors":"Huanwei Wang, Jianqin Guo, Guoyong Hua, Lina Qi, Yuying Zhang, Bin Ye, Jingxin Yan, Lushun Zhang","doi":"10.1177/17085381241258192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a radiofrequency (RF) needle device for varicose ulcers.MethodsFrom September 2020 to September 2021, a total of 80 patients with varicose ulcers were included in this study. Based on the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into RF group and control groups, with 40 cases in each group. In the RF group, RFA was performed using an RF needle device and foam sclerotherapy was used for superficial veins. The control group was treated with conventional high-ligation stripping. The surgical data, hospitalization data, clinical efficacy, and postoperative complications of two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the correlation between RBC, HB, HCT, and ulcer healing time was analyzed.ResultsCompared to the control group, RF group had shorter surgery time, duration in the hospital, and less intraoperative bleeding (<i>p</i> < .05). The VCSS and CIVIQ scores in RF group were significantly higher than that in control group (<i>p</i> < .05). The healing time of ulcers was shorter in the RF group (<i>x</i><sup>2</sup> = 19.766, <i>p</i> = .000). The RF group had fewer postoperative complications. There was a positive correlation between RBC, HB, and HCT, and ulcer healing time (<i>p</i> < .05).ConclusionThe use of the RF needle device for RFA to treat patients with varicose ulcers showed acceptable short-term clinical outcomes with less incidence of trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"582-590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using a radiofrequency needle device for varicose ulcer: A non-randomized controlled prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Huanwei Wang, Jianqin Guo, Guoyong Hua, Lina Qi, Yuying Zhang, Bin Ye, Jingxin Yan, Lushun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381241258192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a radiofrequency (RF) needle device for varicose ulcers.MethodsFrom September 2020 to September 2021, a total of 80 patients with varicose ulcers were included in this study. Based on the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into RF group and control groups, with 40 cases in each group. In the RF group, RFA was performed using an RF needle device and foam sclerotherapy was used for superficial veins. The control group was treated with conventional high-ligation stripping. The surgical data, hospitalization data, clinical efficacy, and postoperative complications of two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the correlation between RBC, HB, HCT, and ulcer healing time was analyzed.ResultsCompared to the control group, RF group had shorter surgery time, duration in the hospital, and less intraoperative bleeding (<i>p</i> < .05). The VCSS and CIVIQ scores in RF group were significantly higher than that in control group (<i>p</i> < .05). The healing time of ulcers was shorter in the RF group (<i>x</i><sup>2</sup> = 19.766, <i>p</i> = .000). The RF group had fewer postoperative complications. There was a positive correlation between RBC, HB, and HCT, and ulcer healing time (<i>p</i> < .05).ConclusionThe use of the RF needle device for RFA to treat patients with varicose ulcers showed acceptable short-term clinical outcomes with less incidence of trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"582-590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241258192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241258192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估使用射频针装置进行射频消融治疗静脉曲张溃疡的短期临床疗效:评估使用射频(RF)针装置进行射频消融(RFA)治疗静脉曲张溃疡的短期临床疗效:2020年9月至2021年9月,本研究共纳入80例静脉曲张溃疡患者。根据不同的手术方法,将患者分为射频组和对照组,每组 40 例。射频组使用射频针装置进行射频消融,对浅表静脉使用泡沫硬化剂治疗。对照组采用传统的高位结扎剥脱术。比较两组的手术数据、住院数据、临床疗效和术后并发症。同时,分析了 RBC、HB、HCT 和溃疡愈合时间之间的相关性:结果:与对照组相比,RF 组手术时间、住院时间更短,术中出血更少(P < .05)。射频组的 VCSS 和 CIVIQ 评分明显高于对照组(P < .05)。射频组的溃疡愈合时间更短(x2 = 19.766,p = .000)。射频组术后并发症较少。RBC、HB和HCT与溃疡愈合时间呈正相关(p < .05):结论:使用射频针装置进行射频消融术治疗静脉曲张溃疡患者可获得可接受的短期临床效果,创伤发生率低,恢复快,并发症少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation using a radiofrequency needle device for varicose ulcer: A non-randomized controlled prospective study.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a radiofrequency (RF) needle device for varicose ulcers.MethodsFrom September 2020 to September 2021, a total of 80 patients with varicose ulcers were included in this study. Based on the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into RF group and control groups, with 40 cases in each group. In the RF group, RFA was performed using an RF needle device and foam sclerotherapy was used for superficial veins. The control group was treated with conventional high-ligation stripping. The surgical data, hospitalization data, clinical efficacy, and postoperative complications of two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the correlation between RBC, HB, HCT, and ulcer healing time was analyzed.ResultsCompared to the control group, RF group had shorter surgery time, duration in the hospital, and less intraoperative bleeding (p < .05). The VCSS and CIVIQ scores in RF group were significantly higher than that in control group (p < .05). The healing time of ulcers was shorter in the RF group (x2 = 19.766, p = .000). The RF group had fewer postoperative complications. There was a positive correlation between RBC, HB, and HCT, and ulcer healing time (p < .05).ConclusionThe use of the RF needle device for RFA to treat patients with varicose ulcers showed acceptable short-term clinical outcomes with less incidence of trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信