{"title":"从居家护理居民评估工具中得出的居家护理患者复杂性指数有效性的初步证据。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Recently, a Complexity Index (CI), based on the multidimensional complexity model and derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (interRAI HC) was proposed as a decision-support tool to help frontline health care professionals in their clinical evaluation to identify and analyze complex situations. This study aims to test the CI: (1) concurrent validity with another measure of complexity (ie, the COMID), (2) convergent validity with related constructs assessed by interRAI HC scales (eg, depression), (3) divergent validity (comparison between CI-COMID and scales-COMID correlations), and (4) predictive validity on coordination meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional observational design was used for a secondary analysis of interRAI HC and COMID data collected in routine home care nursing practice (July-December 2021).</p></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><p>Participants were community-dwelling adults receiving home care, with full interRAI HC and COMID assessments (N = 3533).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Correlational analyses were conducted to test the concurrent validity of the CI (with the COMID) and the convergent and divergent validity of the CI (with interRAI HC<sub>Switzerland</sub> scales, eg, Depression Rating Scale, Method for Assigning Priority Levels, and a Frailty Index). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to test the discriminative ability of CI on specific professional team coordination meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed that the CI correlated positively and strongly with the COMID (ρ = 0.691, <em>P</em> < .001, concurrent validity), positively with all the tested scales (<em>P</em> < .001, convergent validity), whereas the CI-COMID correlation was higher than the interRAI HC scales–COMID correlations (divergent validity). The ROC analysis showed the CI had a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.719, predictive validity).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>The CI demonstrates good validity properties with a strong correlation with the COMID and a high predictive value for coordination meeting. It is distinct from the other interRAI HC scales and has its place among them to support the clinical analysis of complex situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024004687/pdfft?md5=0d00044135aa0d90c675de914f044ea7&pid=1-s2.0-S1525861024004687-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Evidence on the Validity of the Complexity Index Derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care in Home Care Patients\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Recently, a Complexity Index (CI), based on the multidimensional complexity model and derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (interRAI HC) was proposed as a decision-support tool to help frontline health care professionals in their clinical evaluation to identify and analyze complex situations. This study aims to test the CI: (1) concurrent validity with another measure of complexity (ie, the COMID), (2) convergent validity with related constructs assessed by interRAI HC scales (eg, depression), (3) divergent validity (comparison between CI-COMID and scales-COMID correlations), and (4) predictive validity on coordination meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional observational design was used for a secondary analysis of interRAI HC and COMID data collected in routine home care nursing practice (July-December 2021).</p></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><p>Participants were community-dwelling adults receiving home care, with full interRAI HC and COMID assessments (N = 3533).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Correlational analyses were conducted to test the concurrent validity of the CI (with the COMID) and the convergent and divergent validity of the CI (with interRAI HC<sub>Switzerland</sub> scales, eg, Depression Rating Scale, Method for Assigning Priority Levels, and a Frailty Index). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to test the discriminative ability of CI on specific professional team coordination meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed that the CI correlated positively and strongly with the COMID (ρ = 0.691, <em>P</em> < .001, concurrent validity), positively with all the tested scales (<em>P</em> < .001, convergent validity), whereas the CI-COMID correlation was higher than the interRAI HC scales–COMID correlations (divergent validity). The ROC analysis showed the CI had a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.719, predictive validity).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>The CI demonstrates good validity properties with a strong correlation with the COMID and a high predictive value for coordination meeting. It is distinct from the other interRAI HC scales and has its place among them to support the clinical analysis of complex situations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024004687/pdfft?md5=0d00044135aa0d90c675de914f044ea7&pid=1-s2.0-S1525861024004687-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024004687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024004687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:最近,一项基于多维复杂性模型并从家庭护理居民评估工具(interRAI HC)中衍生出来的复杂性指数(CI)被提出作为一种决策支持工具,以帮助一线医护人员在临床评估中识别和分析复杂情况。本研究旨在测试 CI:(1)与另一种复杂性测量(即 COMID)的并发有效性;(2)与 interRAI HC 量表评估的相关构念(如抑郁)的会聚有效性;(3)发散有效性(CI-COMID 与量表-COMID 相关性的比较);以及(4)对协调会议的预测有效性:设计:采用横断面观察设计,对常规家庭护理实践(2021 年 7 月至 12 月)中收集的 interRAI HC 和 COMID 数据进行二次分析:参与者为接受家庭护理的社区成人,他们接受了完整的interRAI HC和COMID评估(N = 3533):进行相关分析以检验 CI(与 COMID)的并发有效性以及 CI(与 InterRAI HCSwitzerland 量表,如抑郁评分量表、优先等级分配方法和虚弱指数)的收敛有效性和发散有效性。此外,还进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析,以检验 CI 对特定专业团队协调会议的判别能力:结果表明,CI 与 COMID 呈强正相关(ρ = 0.691,P < .001,并发效度),与所有测试量表呈正相关(P < .001,收敛效度),而 CI 与 COMID 的相关性则高于 RAI HC 量表间的相关性(发散效度)。ROC 分析显示,CI 的曲线下面积较高(AUC = 0.719,预测有效性):CI具有良好的有效性,与COMID具有很强的相关性,对协调会议具有很高的预测价值。该量表有别于其他 interRAI HC 量表,在支持复杂情况的临床分析中占有一席之地。
First Evidence on the Validity of the Complexity Index Derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care in Home Care Patients
Objectives
Recently, a Complexity Index (CI), based on the multidimensional complexity model and derived from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (interRAI HC) was proposed as a decision-support tool to help frontline health care professionals in their clinical evaluation to identify and analyze complex situations. This study aims to test the CI: (1) concurrent validity with another measure of complexity (ie, the COMID), (2) convergent validity with related constructs assessed by interRAI HC scales (eg, depression), (3) divergent validity (comparison between CI-COMID and scales-COMID correlations), and (4) predictive validity on coordination meetings.
Design
A cross-sectional observational design was used for a secondary analysis of interRAI HC and COMID data collected in routine home care nursing practice (July-December 2021).
Setting and Participants
Participants were community-dwelling adults receiving home care, with full interRAI HC and COMID assessments (N = 3533).
Methods
Correlational analyses were conducted to test the concurrent validity of the CI (with the COMID) and the convergent and divergent validity of the CI (with interRAI HCSwitzerland scales, eg, Depression Rating Scale, Method for Assigning Priority Levels, and a Frailty Index). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to test the discriminative ability of CI on specific professional team coordination meetings.
Results
Results showed that the CI correlated positively and strongly with the COMID (ρ = 0.691, P < .001, concurrent validity), positively with all the tested scales (P < .001, convergent validity), whereas the CI-COMID correlation was higher than the interRAI HC scales–COMID correlations (divergent validity). The ROC analysis showed the CI had a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.719, predictive validity).
Conclusions and Implications
The CI demonstrates good validity properties with a strong correlation with the COMID and a high predictive value for coordination meeting. It is distinct from the other interRAI HC scales and has its place among them to support the clinical analysis of complex situations.
期刊介绍:
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality