南卡罗来纳州精神分裂症医疗补助受益人对长效注射和口服抗精神病药物的依从性、医疗保健利用率和成本。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chao Cai, Chris Kozma, Charmi Patel, Carmela Benson, Ismaeel Yunusa, Pujing Zhao, Gene Reeder, Meera Narasimhan, Robert L Bank
{"title":"南卡罗来纳州精神分裂症医疗补助受益人对长效注射和口服抗精神病药物的依从性、医疗保健利用率和成本。","authors":"Chao Cai, Chris Kozma, Charmi Patel, Carmela Benson, Ismaeel Yunusa, Pujing Zhao, Gene Reeder, Meera Narasimhan, Robert L Bank","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the \"average treatment effect on the treated\" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), higher medication possession ratio with a variable denominator while on therapy (85% vs 80%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and higher persistence (82% vs 64%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The average number of inpatient visits and emergency department visits did not significantly differ between cohorts (0.28 hospitalizations, <i>P</i> = 0.90; 3.68 vs 2.96 emergency department visits, <i>P</i> = 0.19). The number of outpatient visits, including visits for medication administration, were greater in the LAI cohort (23.1 [SD 24.2]) vs OAP (16.9 [SD 21.2]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001); however, including the costs for medication administration visits, outpatient costs (per member) were approximately $2,500 lower in the LAI cohort (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The number of pharmacy visits was greater in the OAP cohort (LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; <i>P</i> = 0.006). All-cause total costs were greater in the LAI cohort ($26,025 [SD $29,909]) vs the OAP cohort ($17,291 [SD $25,261]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and were driven by the difference in pharmaceutical costs (LAI $15,273 [SD $16,183] vs OAP $4,696 [SD $10,371]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"30 6","pages":"549-559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence, health care utilization, and costs between long-acting injectable and oral antipsychotic medications in South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Chao Cai, Chris Kozma, Charmi Patel, Carmela Benson, Ismaeel Yunusa, Pujing Zhao, Gene Reeder, Meera Narasimhan, Robert L Bank\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the \\\"average treatment effect on the treated\\\" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), higher medication possession ratio with a variable denominator while on therapy (85% vs 80%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and higher persistence (82% vs 64%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The average number of inpatient visits and emergency department visits did not significantly differ between cohorts (0.28 hospitalizations, <i>P</i> = 0.90; 3.68 vs 2.96 emergency department visits, <i>P</i> = 0.19). The number of outpatient visits, including visits for medication administration, were greater in the LAI cohort (23.1 [SD 24.2]) vs OAP (16.9 [SD 21.2]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001); however, including the costs for medication administration visits, outpatient costs (per member) were approximately $2,500 lower in the LAI cohort (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The number of pharmacy visits was greater in the OAP cohort (LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; <i>P</i> = 0.006). All-cause total costs were greater in the LAI cohort ($26,025 [SD $29,909]) vs the OAP cohort ($17,291 [SD $25,261]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and were driven by the difference in pharmaceutical costs (LAI $15,273 [SD $16,183] vs OAP $4,696 [SD $10,371]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"549-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11144998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍需要长期服用抗精神病药物进行治疗,但服药依从性差会导致医疗保健使用率和成本增加。长效可注射抗精神病药物(LAIs)具有潜在的治疗优势,因为它们不需要频繁给药,而且能提高用药依从性。在美国各州中,南卡罗来纳州采用长效抗精神病药物的比例最高,因此南卡罗来纳州是比较长效抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症或情感分裂症疗效的理想地区:评估 LAIs 与 OAPs 相比对南卡罗来纳州精神分裂症或情感分裂症医疗补助受益人的用药依从性、医疗资源利用率和费用的影响:纳入南卡罗来纳州医疗补助受益人,他们在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间至少申请过一次 LAI 或 OAP,年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间,至少申请过两次精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍的诊断。使用逻辑回归计算倾向得分(PS),并对混杂因素和结果预测因素进行调整。我们采用倾向分数加权 t 检验和卡方检验来估算 "治疗对被治疗者的平均影响":共有 3,531 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 1,537 人(44.5%)接受了 LAIs 治疗,1,994 人(56.5%)接受了 OAPs 治疗。在 PS 加权分析中,以 365 天为固定分母,LAI 组群的覆盖天数比例高于 OAP 组群(69% vs 64%;P < 0.0001),以可变分母计算,LAI 组群的药物持有率高于 OAP 组群(85% vs 80%;P < 0.0001),持续率也高于 OAP 组群(82% vs 64%;P < 0.0001)。两组患者的平均住院次数和急诊就诊次数没有显著差异(0.28 次住院,P = 0.90;3.68 vs 2.96 次急诊,P = 0.19)。LAI队列的门诊次数(包括用药次数)(23.1 [SD 24.2])高于OAP队列(16.9 [SD 21.2];P < 0.0001);然而,包括用药费用在内,LAI队列的门诊费用(每位成员)低约2500美元(P < 0.0001)。OAP队列的药房就诊次数更多(LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0];P = 0.006)。LAI队列(26,025美元 [SD 29,909美元] )与OAP队列(17,291美元 [SD 25,261美元];P < 0.0001)的全因总成本更高,且由药品成本差异引起(LAI 15,273美元 [SD 16,183美元] vs OAP 4,696美元 [SD 10,371美元];P < 0.0001):在南卡罗来纳州医疗补助受益人中,使用LAI治疗精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍与更高的服药依从率有关。与使用 OAPs 的患者相比,使用 LAIs 的患者的药物费用和总费用较高,但门诊费用和非药物总费用较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence, health care utilization, and costs between long-acting injectable and oral antipsychotic medications in South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

Background: Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder require long-term antipsychotic treatment with antipsychotic medications, but poor medication adherence can lead to increased health care utilization and costs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer potential therapeutic advantages in that they require less frequent dosing and improved medication adherence. South Carolina has the highest adoption of LAIs among US states, making it an ideal population for comparing the effectiveness of LAIs vs oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in treating schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of LAIs compared with OAPs on medication adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Methods: South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with at least 1 claim for an LAI or OAP between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, aged 18 to 65, with at least 2 claims with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for confounders and predictors of the outcome. We estimated the "average treatment effect on the treated" by employing PS-weighted t-tests and chi-square tests.

Results: A total of 3,531 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,537 (44.5%) treated with LAIs and 1,994 (56.5%) treated with OAPs. In PS-weighted analyses, the LAI cohort had a greater proportion of days covered than the OAP cohort with a 365-day fixed denominator (69% vs 64%; P < 0.0001), higher medication possession ratio with a variable denominator while on therapy (85% vs 80%; P < 0.0001), and higher persistence (82% vs 64%; P < 0.0001). The average number of inpatient visits and emergency department visits did not significantly differ between cohorts (0.28 hospitalizations, P = 0.90; 3.68 vs 2.96 emergency department visits, P = 0.19). The number of outpatient visits, including visits for medication administration, were greater in the LAI cohort (23.1 [SD 24.2]) vs OAP (16.9 [SD 21.2]; P < 0.0001); however, including the costs for medication administration visits, outpatient costs (per member) were approximately $2,500 lower in the LAI cohort (P < 0.0001). The number of pharmacy visits was greater in the OAP cohort (LAI 21.0 [SD 17.0] vs OAP 23.0 [SD 15.0]; P = 0.006). All-cause total costs were greater in the LAI cohort ($26,025 [SD $29,909]) vs the OAP cohort ($17,291 [SD $25,261]; P < 0.0001) and were driven by the difference in pharmaceutical costs (LAI $15,273 [SD $16,183] vs OAP $4,696 [SD $10,371]; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Among South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries, treatment with LAIs for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was associated with greater medication adherence rates. Patients using LAIs had higher drug costs and total costs, but lower outpatient and total nondrug costs compared with those using OAPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信