{"title":"利用可穿戴生理数据预测运动消耗水平的深度学习方法。","authors":"Aref Smiley, Joseph Finkelstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using physiological data from wearable devices, the study aimed to predict exercise exertion levels by building deep learning classification and regression models. Physiological data were obtained using an unobtrusive chest-worn ECG sensor and portable pulse oximeter from healthy individuals who performed 16-minute cycling exercise sessions. During each session, real-time ECG, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and revolutions per minute (RPM) data were collected at three intensity levels. Subjects' ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected once per minute. Each 16-minute exercise session was divided into eight 2-minute windows. The self-reported RPEs, heart rate, RPMs, and oxygen saturation levels were averaged for each window to form the predictive features. In addition, heart rate variability (HRV) features were extracted from the ECG for each window. Different feature selection algorithms were used to choose top-ranked predictors. The best predictors were then used to train and test deep learning models for regression and classification analysis. Our results showed the highest accuracy and F1 score of 98.2% and 98%, respectively in training the models. For testing the models, the highest accuracy and F1 score were 80%.</p>","PeriodicalId":72181,"journal":{"name":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Exercise Exertion Levels Using Wearable Physiological Data.\",\"authors\":\"Aref Smiley, Joseph Finkelstein\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using physiological data from wearable devices, the study aimed to predict exercise exertion levels by building deep learning classification and regression models. Physiological data were obtained using an unobtrusive chest-worn ECG sensor and portable pulse oximeter from healthy individuals who performed 16-minute cycling exercise sessions. During each session, real-time ECG, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and revolutions per minute (RPM) data were collected at three intensity levels. Subjects' ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected once per minute. Each 16-minute exercise session was divided into eight 2-minute windows. The self-reported RPEs, heart rate, RPMs, and oxygen saturation levels were averaged for each window to form the predictive features. In addition, heart rate variability (HRV) features were extracted from the ECG for each window. Different feature selection algorithms were used to choose top-ranked predictors. The best predictors were then used to train and test deep learning models for regression and classification analysis. Our results showed the highest accuracy and F1 score of 98.2% and 98%, respectively in training the models. For testing the models, the highest accuracy and F1 score were 80%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究旨在利用可穿戴设备提供的生理数据,通过建立深度学习分类和回归模型来预测运动消耗水平。研究人员使用非侵入性胸戴式心电图传感器和便携式脉搏血氧仪获取了健康人的生理数据,这些健康人进行了 16 分钟的自行车运动。在每次运动过程中,以三种强度水平收集实时心电图、脉搏率、血氧饱和度和每分钟转数(RPM)数据。受试者的体力感知评分(RPE)每分钟收集一次。每个 16 分钟的运动时段被分为 8 个 2 分钟的窗口。对每个窗口的自我报告的 RPE、心率、转速和血氧饱和度水平进行平均,以形成预测特征。此外,还从每个窗口的心电图中提取了心率变异性(HRV)特征。使用不同的特征选择算法来选择排名靠前的预测因子。最佳预测因子随后被用于训练和测试深度学习模型,以进行回归和分类分析。我们的结果显示,在训练模型时,最高准确率和 F1 分数分别为 98.2% 和 98%。在测试模型时,最高准确率和 F1 分数均为 80%。
Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Exercise Exertion Levels Using Wearable Physiological Data.
Using physiological data from wearable devices, the study aimed to predict exercise exertion levels by building deep learning classification and regression models. Physiological data were obtained using an unobtrusive chest-worn ECG sensor and portable pulse oximeter from healthy individuals who performed 16-minute cycling exercise sessions. During each session, real-time ECG, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and revolutions per minute (RPM) data were collected at three intensity levels. Subjects' ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were collected once per minute. Each 16-minute exercise session was divided into eight 2-minute windows. The self-reported RPEs, heart rate, RPMs, and oxygen saturation levels were averaged for each window to form the predictive features. In addition, heart rate variability (HRV) features were extracted from the ECG for each window. Different feature selection algorithms were used to choose top-ranked predictors. The best predictors were then used to train and test deep learning models for regression and classification analysis. Our results showed the highest accuracy and F1 score of 98.2% and 98%, respectively in training the models. For testing the models, the highest accuracy and F1 score were 80%.