几何二方匹配在 NC 中

Sujoy Bhore, Sarfaraz Equbal, Rohit Gurjar
{"title":"几何二方匹配在 NC 中","authors":"Sujoy Bhore, Sarfaraz Equbal, Rohit Gurjar","doi":"arxiv-2405.18833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we study the parallel complexity of the Euclidean\nminimum-weight perfect matching (EWPM) problem. Here our graph is the complete\nbipartite graph $G$ on two sets of points $A$ and $B$ in $\\mathbb{R}^2$ and the\nweight of each edge is the Euclidean distance between the corresponding points.\nThe weighted perfect matching problem on general bipartite graphs is known to\nbe in RNC [Mulmuley, Vazirani, and Vazirani, 1987], and Quasi-NC [Fenner,\nGurjar, and Thierauf, 2016]. Both of these results work only when the weights\nare of $O(\\log n)$ bits. It is a long-standing open question to show the\nproblem to be in NC. First, we show that for EWPM, a linear number of bits of approximation is\nrequired to distinguish between the minimum-weight perfect matching and other\nperfect matchings. Next, we show that the EWPM problem that allows up to\n$\\frac{1}{poly(n)}$ additive error, is in NC.","PeriodicalId":501570,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometric Bipartite Matching is in NC\",\"authors\":\"Sujoy Bhore, Sarfaraz Equbal, Rohit Gurjar\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.18833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we study the parallel complexity of the Euclidean\\nminimum-weight perfect matching (EWPM) problem. Here our graph is the complete\\nbipartite graph $G$ on two sets of points $A$ and $B$ in $\\\\mathbb{R}^2$ and the\\nweight of each edge is the Euclidean distance between the corresponding points.\\nThe weighted perfect matching problem on general bipartite graphs is known to\\nbe in RNC [Mulmuley, Vazirani, and Vazirani, 1987], and Quasi-NC [Fenner,\\nGurjar, and Thierauf, 2016]. Both of these results work only when the weights\\nare of $O(\\\\log n)$ bits. It is a long-standing open question to show the\\nproblem to be in NC. First, we show that for EWPM, a linear number of bits of approximation is\\nrequired to distinguish between the minimum-weight perfect matching and other\\nperfect matchings. Next, we show that the EWPM problem that allows up to\\n$\\\\frac{1}{poly(n)}$ additive error, is in NC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.18833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.18833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们研究了欧氏最小权重完全匹配(EWPM)问题的并行复杂性。这里,我们的图是在 $\mathbb{R}^2$ 中两组点 $A$ 和 $B$ 上的完整双态势图 $G$,每条边的权重是对应点之间的欧氏距离。已知一般双态势图上的加权完美匹配问题属于 RNC [Mulmuley, Vazirani, and Vazirani, 1987] 和准 NC [Fenner,Gurjar, and Thierauf, 2016]。这两个结果都只在权重为 $O(\log n)$ 位时有效。如何证明该问题是 NC 问题,是一个长期悬而未决的问题。首先,我们证明对于 EWPM,需要线性比特数的近似值才能区分最小权重完美匹配和其他完美匹配。接下来,我们证明允许最多$\frac{1}{poly(n)}$加性误差的 EWPM 问题是 NC 问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geometric Bipartite Matching is in NC
In this work, we study the parallel complexity of the Euclidean minimum-weight perfect matching (EWPM) problem. Here our graph is the complete bipartite graph $G$ on two sets of points $A$ and $B$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the weight of each edge is the Euclidean distance between the corresponding points. The weighted perfect matching problem on general bipartite graphs is known to be in RNC [Mulmuley, Vazirani, and Vazirani, 1987], and Quasi-NC [Fenner, Gurjar, and Thierauf, 2016]. Both of these results work only when the weights are of $O(\log n)$ bits. It is a long-standing open question to show the problem to be in NC. First, we show that for EWPM, a linear number of bits of approximation is required to distinguish between the minimum-weight perfect matching and other perfect matchings. Next, we show that the EWPM problem that allows up to $\frac{1}{poly(n)}$ additive error, is in NC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信