121 个国家对气候变化威胁的看法:个人和国家财富的作用

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Matthew J. Hornsey, Samuel Pearson
{"title":"121 个国家对气候变化威胁的看法:个人和国家财富的作用","authors":"Matthew J. Hornsey,&nbsp;Samuel Pearson","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The post-materialist hypothesis suggests that perceptions of climate change threat will be greatest among the most affluent individuals and nations. In contrast, we present a precarity hypothesis: that perceptions of threat will be greatest among the most economically vulnerable individuals and nations, who are least equipped to adapt to a changing climate. To examine these predictions, we analyzed Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll (2021), which asked 280,000 individuals from 121 countries to indicate the degree of threat they believed climate change presented to their country in the next 20 years. Overall, no relationship was found between nation-level affluence – as measured by the Human Development Index (HDI) – and perceived climate change threat. Threat shared a small positive association with individual-level income, but an even stronger positive relationship with subjective financial distress. This relationship between subjective financial distress and climate change threat was particularly strong in low-HDI countries. Together, the data show little evidence for the post-materialist hypothesis and are more consistent with a precarity hypothesis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001117/pdfft?md5=8d98d00dbd438585f7b9186a15e9d459&pid=1-s2.0-S0272494424001117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of climate change threat across 121 nations: The role of individual and national wealth\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Hornsey,&nbsp;Samuel Pearson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The post-materialist hypothesis suggests that perceptions of climate change threat will be greatest among the most affluent individuals and nations. In contrast, we present a precarity hypothesis: that perceptions of threat will be greatest among the most economically vulnerable individuals and nations, who are least equipped to adapt to a changing climate. To examine these predictions, we analyzed Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll (2021), which asked 280,000 individuals from 121 countries to indicate the degree of threat they believed climate change presented to their country in the next 20 years. Overall, no relationship was found between nation-level affluence – as measured by the Human Development Index (HDI) – and perceived climate change threat. Threat shared a small positive association with individual-level income, but an even stronger positive relationship with subjective financial distress. This relationship between subjective financial distress and climate change threat was particularly strong in low-HDI countries. Together, the data show little evidence for the post-materialist hypothesis and are more consistent with a precarity hypothesis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001117/pdfft?md5=8d98d00dbd438585f7b9186a15e9d459&pid=1-s2.0-S0272494424001117-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001117\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424001117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后物质主义假说认为,最富裕的个人和国家对气候变化威胁的认识将最为深刻。与此相反,我们提出了不稳定性假说:经济最脆弱的个人和国家对威胁的感知将最为强烈,他们最没有能力适应不断变化的气候。为了研究这些预测,我们分析了劳埃德注册基金会的世界风险民意调查(2021 年),该调查要求来自 121 个国家的 28 万人指出他们认为气候变化在未来 20 年对其国家造成的威胁程度。总体而言,以人类发展指数(HDI)衡量的国家富裕程度与气候变化威胁感知之间没有关系。气候变化威胁与个人收入之间存在微小的正相关关系,但与主观财务困境之间存在更强的正相关关系。在人类发展指数较低的国家,主观财务困境与气候变化威胁之间的关系尤为密切。总之,这些数据几乎不能证明后物质主义假说,而更符合不稳定性假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of climate change threat across 121 nations: The role of individual and national wealth

The post-materialist hypothesis suggests that perceptions of climate change threat will be greatest among the most affluent individuals and nations. In contrast, we present a precarity hypothesis: that perceptions of threat will be greatest among the most economically vulnerable individuals and nations, who are least equipped to adapt to a changing climate. To examine these predictions, we analyzed Lloyd's Register Foundation World Risk Poll (2021), which asked 280,000 individuals from 121 countries to indicate the degree of threat they believed climate change presented to their country in the next 20 years. Overall, no relationship was found between nation-level affluence – as measured by the Human Development Index (HDI) – and perceived climate change threat. Threat shared a small positive association with individual-level income, but an even stronger positive relationship with subjective financial distress. This relationship between subjective financial distress and climate change threat was particularly strong in low-HDI countries. Together, the data show little evidence for the post-materialist hypothesis and are more consistent with a precarity hypothesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信