撒哈拉以南非洲高等教育中的考试舞弊行为(EMALBiHE):系统回顾

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dickson Okoree Mireku , Brandford Bervell , Prosper Dzifa Dzamesi
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲高等教育中的考试舞弊行为(EMALBiHE):系统回顾","authors":"Dickson Okoree Mireku ,&nbsp;Brandford Bervell ,&nbsp;Prosper Dzifa Dzamesi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After decades of continuous attempts to curb examination malpractices in higher education within Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), some discussions have emerged but are scattered within the literature. This study, therefore, sought to map the distribution of studies by conducting a systematic review of examination practices incidence within the SSA higher education delivery. The studies reviewed were based on 96 examination malpractice-related studies spanning 2012–2023. The data extraction process was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Results obtained after the review, showed that the Western part of SSA had the highest frequency of studies, with 70 emanating from Nigeria and 8 from Ghana. Southern SSA produced only a single study from Zimbabwe, representing the region with the lowest frequency of studies on examination malpractice. From the review, the most frequently cited causes of examination malpractice were societal pressure and obsession for academic certificates, while the erosion of educational quality, and devaluation of certificates emerged as the major effects of examination malpractice. The promotion of educational values, and examination ethics emerged as the most effective strategies mentioned in the studies found. In essence, the discoveries and suggestions presented in this review significantly contribute to the ongoing efforts aimed at halting the spread of examination malpractice in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 103064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination malpractice behaviours in Higher Education (EMALBiHE) in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Dickson Okoree Mireku ,&nbsp;Brandford Bervell ,&nbsp;Prosper Dzifa Dzamesi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>After decades of continuous attempts to curb examination malpractices in higher education within Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), some discussions have emerged but are scattered within the literature. This study, therefore, sought to map the distribution of studies by conducting a systematic review of examination practices incidence within the SSA higher education delivery. The studies reviewed were based on 96 examination malpractice-related studies spanning 2012–2023. The data extraction process was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Results obtained after the review, showed that the Western part of SSA had the highest frequency of studies, with 70 emanating from Nigeria and 8 from Ghana. Southern SSA produced only a single study from Zimbabwe, representing the region with the lowest frequency of studies on examination malpractice. From the review, the most frequently cited causes of examination malpractice were societal pressure and obsession for academic certificates, while the erosion of educational quality, and devaluation of certificates emerged as the major effects of examination malpractice. The promotion of educational values, and examination ethics emerged as the most effective strategies mentioned in the studies found. In essence, the discoveries and suggestions presented in this review significantly contribute to the ongoing efforts aimed at halting the spread of examination malpractice in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324000865\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059324000865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)一直在努力遏制高等教育中的考试舞弊现象。因此,本研究试图通过对撒哈拉以南非洲高等教育中考试舞弊现象进行系统审查来了解研究的分布情况。所回顾的研究基于 96 项与考试舞弊相关的研究,时间跨度为 2012-2023 年。数据提取过程遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)协议。审查结果显示,撒南非洲西部地区的研究最多,其中 70 项来自尼日利亚,8 项来自加纳。南部撒哈拉以南非洲地区仅有一项研究来自津巴布韦,是对考试舞弊进行研究频率最低的地区。从审查结果来看,最常提到的考试舞弊原因是社会压力和对学历证书的痴迷,而教育质量的下降和学历证书的贬值则是考试舞弊的主要影响。在所发现的研究中,宣传教育价值观和考试道德成为最有效的策略。从本质上讲,本综述中提出的发现和建议极大地促进了撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)地区为制止考试舞弊蔓延而正在进行的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination malpractice behaviours in Higher Education (EMALBiHE) in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review

After decades of continuous attempts to curb examination malpractices in higher education within Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), some discussions have emerged but are scattered within the literature. This study, therefore, sought to map the distribution of studies by conducting a systematic review of examination practices incidence within the SSA higher education delivery. The studies reviewed were based on 96 examination malpractice-related studies spanning 2012–2023. The data extraction process was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Results obtained after the review, showed that the Western part of SSA had the highest frequency of studies, with 70 emanating from Nigeria and 8 from Ghana. Southern SSA produced only a single study from Zimbabwe, representing the region with the lowest frequency of studies on examination malpractice. From the review, the most frequently cited causes of examination malpractice were societal pressure and obsession for academic certificates, while the erosion of educational quality, and devaluation of certificates emerged as the major effects of examination malpractice. The promotion of educational values, and examination ethics emerged as the most effective strategies mentioned in the studies found. In essence, the discoveries and suggestions presented in this review significantly contribute to the ongoing efforts aimed at halting the spread of examination malpractice in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信