多样性和公平性优化的数学模型和求解方法

IF 1.1 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Rafael Martí, Francisco Parreño, Jorge Mortes
{"title":"多样性和公平性优化的数学模型和求解方法","authors":"Rafael Martí, Francisco Parreño, Jorge Mortes","doi":"10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Discrete diversity optimization basically consists of selecting a subset of elements of a given set in such a way that the sum of their pairwise distances is maximized. Equity, on the other hand, refers to minimizing the difference between the maximum and the minimum distances in the subset of selected elements to balance their diversity. Both problems have been studied in the combinatorial optimization literature, but recently major drawbacks in their classic mathematical formulations have been identified. We propose new mathematical models to overcome these limitations, including multi-objective optimization, and heuristics to solve large-size instances of them. Specifically, we propose a matheuristic based on the CMSA framework for diversity and a GRASP heuristic for equity. Our extensive experimentation compares the original models with the new proposals by analyzing the solutions of our heuristics and those of the previous approaches, both from a single objective and a bi-objective paradigm. We also evaluate their quality with respect to the optimal solutions obtained with CPLEX, size permitting. Statistical analysis allows us to draw significant conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heuristics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical models and solving methods for diversity and equity optimization\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Martí, Francisco Parreño, Jorge Mortes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Discrete diversity optimization basically consists of selecting a subset of elements of a given set in such a way that the sum of their pairwise distances is maximized. Equity, on the other hand, refers to minimizing the difference between the maximum and the minimum distances in the subset of selected elements to balance their diversity. Both problems have been studied in the combinatorial optimization literature, but recently major drawbacks in their classic mathematical formulations have been identified. We propose new mathematical models to overcome these limitations, including multi-objective optimization, and heuristics to solve large-size instances of them. Specifically, we propose a matheuristic based on the CMSA framework for diversity and a GRASP heuristic for equity. Our extensive experimentation compares the original models with the new proposals by analyzing the solutions of our heuristics and those of the previous approaches, both from a single objective and a bi-objective paradigm. We also evaluate their quality with respect to the optimal solutions obtained with CPLEX, size permitting. Statistical analysis allows us to draw significant conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heuristics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heuristics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heuristics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-024-09529-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

离散多样性优化的基本原理是,从给定集合中选择一个元素子集,使它们的成对距离之和达到最大。另一方面,均衡是指最小化所选元素子集中最大距离和最小距离之间的差值,以平衡其多样性。这两个问题在组合优化文献中都有研究,但最近发现它们的经典数学公式存在重大缺陷。我们提出了新的数学模型来克服这些局限性,包括多目标优化,以及解决其大型实例的启发式方法。具体来说,我们提出了一种基于 CMSA 框架的多样性数学启发式和一种公平性 GRASP 启发式。我们进行了广泛的实验,从单一目标和双目标范例出发,通过分析我们的启发式方法和之前方法的解决方案,对原始模型和新建议进行了比较。在规模允许的情况下,我们还根据 CPLEX 获得的最优解对它们的质量进行了评估。通过统计分析,我们得出了重要结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mathematical models and solving methods for diversity and equity optimization

Mathematical models and solving methods for diversity and equity optimization

Discrete diversity optimization basically consists of selecting a subset of elements of a given set in such a way that the sum of their pairwise distances is maximized. Equity, on the other hand, refers to minimizing the difference between the maximum and the minimum distances in the subset of selected elements to balance their diversity. Both problems have been studied in the combinatorial optimization literature, but recently major drawbacks in their classic mathematical formulations have been identified. We propose new mathematical models to overcome these limitations, including multi-objective optimization, and heuristics to solve large-size instances of them. Specifically, we propose a matheuristic based on the CMSA framework for diversity and a GRASP heuristic for equity. Our extensive experimentation compares the original models with the new proposals by analyzing the solutions of our heuristics and those of the previous approaches, both from a single objective and a bi-objective paradigm. We also evaluate their quality with respect to the optimal solutions obtained with CPLEX, size permitting. Statistical analysis allows us to draw significant conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Heuristics
Journal of Heuristics 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heuristics provides a forum for advancing the state-of-the-art in the theory and practical application of techniques for solving problems approximately that cannot be solved exactly. It fosters the development, understanding, and practical use of heuristic solution techniques for solving business, engineering, and societal problems. It considers the importance of theoretical, empirical, and experimental work related to the development of heuristics. The journal presents practical applications, theoretical developments, decision analysis models that consider issues of rational decision making with limited information, artificial intelligence-based heuristics applied to a wide variety of problems, learning paradigms, and computational experimentation. Officially cited as: J Heuristics Provides a forum for advancing the state-of-the-art in the theory and practical application of techniques for solving problems approximately that cannot be solved exactly. Fosters the development, understanding, and practical use of heuristic solution techniques for solving business, engineering, and societal problems. Considers the importance of theoretical, empirical, and experimental work related to the development of heuristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信