人工智能驱动理论发现的三驾马车

Yang-Hui He
{"title":"人工智能驱动理论发现的三驾马车","authors":"Yang-Hui He","doi":"arxiv-2405.19973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen the dramatic rise of the usage of AI algorithms in\npure mathematics and fundamental sciences such as theoretical physics. This is\nperhaps counter-intuitive since mathematical sciences require the rigorous\ndefinitions, derivations, and proofs, in contrast to the experimental sciences\nwhich rely on the modelling of data with error-bars. In this Perspective, we\ncategorize the approaches to mathematical discovery as \"top-down\", \"bottom-up\"\nand \"meta-mathematics\", as inspired by historical examples. We review some of\nthe progress over the last few years, comparing and contrasting both the\nadvances and the short-comings in each approach. We argue that while the\ntheorist is in no way in danger of being replaced by AI in the near future, the\nhybrid of human expertise and AI algorithms will become an integral part of\ntheoretical discovery.","PeriodicalId":501462,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Triumvirate of AI Driven Theoretical Discovery\",\"authors\":\"Yang-Hui He\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.19973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have seen the dramatic rise of the usage of AI algorithms in\\npure mathematics and fundamental sciences such as theoretical physics. This is\\nperhaps counter-intuitive since mathematical sciences require the rigorous\\ndefinitions, derivations, and proofs, in contrast to the experimental sciences\\nwhich rely on the modelling of data with error-bars. In this Perspective, we\\ncategorize the approaches to mathematical discovery as \\\"top-down\\\", \\\"bottom-up\\\"\\nand \\\"meta-mathematics\\\", as inspired by historical examples. We review some of\\nthe progress over the last few years, comparing and contrasting both the\\nadvances and the short-comings in each approach. We argue that while the\\ntheorist is in no way in danger of being replaced by AI in the near future, the\\nhybrid of human expertise and AI algorithms will become an integral part of\\ntheoretical discovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.19973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.19973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人工智能算法在纯数学和理论物理学等基础科学领域的应用急剧增加。这或许有悖常理,因为数学科学需要严格的定义、推导和证明,而实验科学则依赖于带有误差的数据建模。在本《视角》中,受历史实例的启发,我们将数学发现的方法分为 "自上而下"、"自下而上 "和 "元数学"。我们回顾了过去几年的一些进展,比较和对比了每种方法的优势和不足。我们认为,虽然理论家在不久的将来绝不会有被人工智能取代的危险,但人类专业知识与人工智能算法的混合将成为理论发现不可或缺的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Triumvirate of AI Driven Theoretical Discovery
Recent years have seen the dramatic rise of the usage of AI algorithms in pure mathematics and fundamental sciences such as theoretical physics. This is perhaps counter-intuitive since mathematical sciences require the rigorous definitions, derivations, and proofs, in contrast to the experimental sciences which rely on the modelling of data with error-bars. In this Perspective, we categorize the approaches to mathematical discovery as "top-down", "bottom-up" and "meta-mathematics", as inspired by historical examples. We review some of the progress over the last few years, comparing and contrasting both the advances and the short-comings in each approach. We argue that while the theorist is in no way in danger of being replaced by AI in the near future, the hybrid of human expertise and AI algorithms will become an integral part of theoretical discovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信