在云/边缘架构中分配资源的变分量子算法

Carlo Mastroianni;Francesco Plastina;Jacopo Settino;Andrea Vinci
{"title":"在云/边缘架构中分配资源的变分量子算法","authors":"Carlo Mastroianni;Francesco Plastina;Jacopo Settino;Andrea Vinci","doi":"10.1109/TQE.2024.3398410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern cloud/edge architectures need to orchestrate multiple layers of heterogeneous computing nodes, including pervasive sensors/actuators, distributed edge/fog nodes, centralized data centers, and quantum devices. The optimal assignment and scheduling of computation on the different nodes is a very difficult problem, with NP-hard complexity. In this article, we explore the possibility of solving this problem with variational quantum algorithms, which can become a viable alternative to classical algorithms in the near future. In particular, we compare the performance, in terms of success probability, of two algorithms, i.e., quantum approximate optimization algorithm and variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). The simulation experiments, performed for a set of simple problems, show that the VQE algorithm ensures better performance when it is equipped with appropriate circuit \n<italic>ansatzes</i>\n that are able to restrict the search space. Moreover, experiments executed on real quantum hardware show that the execution time, when increasing the size of the problem, grows much more slowly than the trend obtained with classical computation, which is known to be exponential.","PeriodicalId":100644,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering","volume":"5 ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10522849","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variational Quantum Algorithms for the Allocation of Resources in a Cloud/Edge Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Mastroianni;Francesco Plastina;Jacopo Settino;Andrea Vinci\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TQE.2024.3398410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern cloud/edge architectures need to orchestrate multiple layers of heterogeneous computing nodes, including pervasive sensors/actuators, distributed edge/fog nodes, centralized data centers, and quantum devices. The optimal assignment and scheduling of computation on the different nodes is a very difficult problem, with NP-hard complexity. In this article, we explore the possibility of solving this problem with variational quantum algorithms, which can become a viable alternative to classical algorithms in the near future. In particular, we compare the performance, in terms of success probability, of two algorithms, i.e., quantum approximate optimization algorithm and variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). The simulation experiments, performed for a set of simple problems, show that the VQE algorithm ensures better performance when it is equipped with appropriate circuit \\n<italic>ansatzes</i>\\n that are able to restrict the search space. Moreover, experiments executed on real quantum hardware show that the execution time, when increasing the size of the problem, grows much more slowly than the trend obtained with classical computation, which is known to be exponential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10522849\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10522849/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10522849/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代云/边缘架构需要协调多层异构计算节点,包括普适传感器/执行器、分布式边缘/雾节点、集中式数据中心和量子设备。不同节点上计算的最优分配和调度是一个非常困难的问题,其复杂度为 NP-hard。在本文中,我们探讨了利用变量子算法解决这一问题的可能性,在不久的将来,变量子算法将成为经典算法的可行替代方案。特别是,我们从成功概率的角度比较了两种算法的性能,即量子近似优化算法和变量子求解器(VQE)。针对一组简单问题进行的模拟实验表明,当 VQE 算法配备了能够限制搜索空间的适当电路时,它能确保更好的性能。此外,在真实量子硬件上进行的实验表明,当问题的规模增大时,执行时间的增长速度比经典计算的增长速度要慢得多,而经典计算的增长速度是指数级的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variational Quantum Algorithms for the Allocation of Resources in a Cloud/Edge Architecture
Modern cloud/edge architectures need to orchestrate multiple layers of heterogeneous computing nodes, including pervasive sensors/actuators, distributed edge/fog nodes, centralized data centers, and quantum devices. The optimal assignment and scheduling of computation on the different nodes is a very difficult problem, with NP-hard complexity. In this article, we explore the possibility of solving this problem with variational quantum algorithms, which can become a viable alternative to classical algorithms in the near future. In particular, we compare the performance, in terms of success probability, of two algorithms, i.e., quantum approximate optimization algorithm and variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). The simulation experiments, performed for a set of simple problems, show that the VQE algorithm ensures better performance when it is equipped with appropriate circuit ansatzes that are able to restrict the search space. Moreover, experiments executed on real quantum hardware show that the execution time, when increasing the size of the problem, grows much more slowly than the trend obtained with classical computation, which is known to be exponential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信