对颅内出血风险较高的心房颤动患者进行左心房阑尾关闭术。

IF 2.6 1区 医学
Avia Abramovitz Fouks, Shadi Yaghi, Elif Gokcal, Alvin S Das, Ofer Rotschild, Scott B Silverman, Aneesh B Singhal, Jorge Romero, Sunil Kapur, Steven M Greenberg, Mahmut Edip Gurol
{"title":"对颅内出血风险较高的心房颤动患者进行左心房阑尾关闭术。","authors":"Avia Abramovitz Fouks, Shadi Yaghi, Elif Gokcal, Alvin S Das, Ofer Rotschild, Scott B Silverman, Aneesh B Singhal, Jorge Romero, Sunil Kapur, Steven M Greenberg, Mahmut Edip Gurol","doi":"10.1136/svn-2024-003142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is performed in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), outcome data are scarce. We assessed the detailed neurological indications for LAAC and outcomes after LAAC in high ICH risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study population included consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC in a single hospital network between January 2015 and October 2021 because of prior ICH or the presence of high ICH risk imaging markers on brain MRI (cerebral microbleeds (CMBs)). Primary safety and efficacy outcome measures were the occurrence of ICH and thromboembolic events, respectively, after LAAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 146 patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC for high ICH risk, 122 had a history of ICH, while 24 presented with high ICH risk imaging markers only. Mean age was 75.7±7.61, 42 (28.8%) were women. Mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 5.23±1.52. Of 122 patients with ICH history, 58 (47.5%) had intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH), 40 (32.8%) had traumatic ICH (T-ICH) and 18 (14.7%) had non-traumatic subdural haemorrhage. Of 85 patients with brain MRIs including necessary sequences, 43 (50.6%) were related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy and 37 (43.5%) to hypertensive microangiopathy. While 70% of patients were discharged on oral anticoagulants (OAC), 92% were not taking OAC at 1 year. Over 2.12 years mean follow-up, one patient had recurrent non-traumatic IPH (incidence rate (IR) 0.32 per 100 patient-years), five had T-ICH (IR 1.61 per 100 patient-years) and six had an ischaemic stroke (IR 1.94 per 100 patient-years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with NVAF at high ICH risk, LAAC demonstrated a low risk of recurrent ICH or ischaemic stroke compared with previously published data. LAAC in high ICH risk populations should be considered in clinical practice per FDA approval and recent guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left atrial appendage closure for patients with atrial fibrillation at high intracranial haemorrhagic risk.\",\"authors\":\"Avia Abramovitz Fouks, Shadi Yaghi, Elif Gokcal, Alvin S Das, Ofer Rotschild, Scott B Silverman, Aneesh B Singhal, Jorge Romero, Sunil Kapur, Steven M Greenberg, Mahmut Edip Gurol\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2024-003142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is performed in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), outcome data are scarce. We assessed the detailed neurological indications for LAAC and outcomes after LAAC in high ICH risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study population included consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC in a single hospital network between January 2015 and October 2021 because of prior ICH or the presence of high ICH risk imaging markers on brain MRI (cerebral microbleeds (CMBs)). Primary safety and efficacy outcome measures were the occurrence of ICH and thromboembolic events, respectively, after LAAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 146 patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC for high ICH risk, 122 had a history of ICH, while 24 presented with high ICH risk imaging markers only. Mean age was 75.7±7.61, 42 (28.8%) were women. Mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score was 5.23±1.52. Of 122 patients with ICH history, 58 (47.5%) had intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH), 40 (32.8%) had traumatic ICH (T-ICH) and 18 (14.7%) had non-traumatic subdural haemorrhage. Of 85 patients with brain MRIs including necessary sequences, 43 (50.6%) were related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy and 37 (43.5%) to hypertensive microangiopathy. While 70% of patients were discharged on oral anticoagulants (OAC), 92% were not taking OAC at 1 year. Over 2.12 years mean follow-up, one patient had recurrent non-traumatic IPH (incidence rate (IR) 0.32 per 100 patient-years), five had T-ICH (IR 1.61 per 100 patient-years) and six had an ischaemic stroke (IR 1.94 per 100 patient-years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with NVAF at high ICH risk, LAAC demonstrated a low risk of recurrent ICH or ischaemic stroke compared with previously published data. LAAC in high ICH risk populations should be considered in clinical practice per FDA approval and recent guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2024-003142\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2024-003142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管左心房阑尾关闭术(LAAC)适用于颅内出血(ICH)风险较高的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者,但结果数据却很少。我们评估了 LAAC 的详细神经适应症以及高 ICH 风险患者 LAAC 后的疗效:研究对象包括2015年1月至2021年10月期间在一家医院网络中接受LAAC治疗的连续NVAF患者,这些患者的原因是既往有ICH或脑MRI上存在高ICH风险成像标记物(脑微出血(CMB))。主要安全性和疗效结局指标分别为 LAAC 后 ICH 和血栓栓塞事件的发生率:146名因高ICH风险而接受LAAC治疗的NVAF患者中,122人有ICH病史,24人仅有高ICH风险影像学标记。平均年龄为(75.7±7.61)岁,女性42人(28.8%)。平均 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分为 5.23±1.52。122 名有 ICH 病史的患者中,58 人(47.5%)有实质内出血(IPH),40 人(32.8%)有外伤性 ICH(T-ICH),18 人(14.7%)有非外伤性硬膜下出血。在85名接受脑部磁共振成像(包括必要序列)检查的患者中,43人(50.6%)与脑淀粉样血管病有关,37人(43.5%)与高血压微血管病有关。70%的患者在出院时服用了口服抗凝药(OAC),92%的患者在1年后没有服用OAC。在平均 2.12 年的随访中,1 名患者复发了非创伤性 IPH(发病率(IR)为 0.32/100),5 名患者发生了 T-ICH (IR 为 1.61/100),6 名患者发生了缺血性中风(IR 为 1.94/100):结论:与之前发表的数据相比,在高 ICH 风险的 NVAF 患者中,LAAC 显示复发性 ICH 或缺血性中风的风险较低。根据美国食品药品管理局的批准和最新指南,临床实践中应考虑在高 ICH 风险人群中使用 LAAC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left atrial appendage closure for patients with atrial fibrillation at high intracranial haemorrhagic risk.

Background and objectives: Although left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is performed in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), outcome data are scarce. We assessed the detailed neurological indications for LAAC and outcomes after LAAC in high ICH risk patients.

Methods: Study population included consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC in a single hospital network between January 2015 and October 2021 because of prior ICH or the presence of high ICH risk imaging markers on brain MRI (cerebral microbleeds (CMBs)). Primary safety and efficacy outcome measures were the occurrence of ICH and thromboembolic events, respectively, after LAAC.

Results: Among 146 patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC for high ICH risk, 122 had a history of ICH, while 24 presented with high ICH risk imaging markers only. Mean age was 75.7±7.61, 42 (28.8%) were women. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5.23±1.52. Of 122 patients with ICH history, 58 (47.5%) had intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH), 40 (32.8%) had traumatic ICH (T-ICH) and 18 (14.7%) had non-traumatic subdural haemorrhage. Of 85 patients with brain MRIs including necessary sequences, 43 (50.6%) were related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy and 37 (43.5%) to hypertensive microangiopathy. While 70% of patients were discharged on oral anticoagulants (OAC), 92% were not taking OAC at 1 year. Over 2.12 years mean follow-up, one patient had recurrent non-traumatic IPH (incidence rate (IR) 0.32 per 100 patient-years), five had T-ICH (IR 1.61 per 100 patient-years) and six had an ischaemic stroke (IR 1.94 per 100 patient-years).

Conclusions: Among patients with NVAF at high ICH risk, LAAC demonstrated a low risk of recurrent ICH or ischaemic stroke compared with previously published data. LAAC in high ICH risk populations should be considered in clinical practice per FDA approval and recent guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALMEDICINE, RESE-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信