[院内心脏骤停后的生活质量:一所大学中心 11 年的经验]。

Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s00101-024-01423-3
Benedikt Treml, Christine Eckhardt, Christoph Oberleitner, Thomas Ploner, Christopher Rugg, Aleksandra Radovanovic Spurnic, Sasa Rajsic
{"title":"[院内心脏骤停后的生活质量:一所大学中心 11 年的经验]。","authors":"Benedikt Treml, Christine Eckhardt, Christoph Oberleitner, Thomas Ploner, Christopher Rugg, Aleksandra Radovanovic Spurnic, Sasa Rajsic","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01423-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent medical care and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Given that in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is still poorly investigated, data on health-associated quality of life thereafter remains scarce. The available evidence is mostly transferred from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest studies, but the epidemiology and determinants of success might be different. The aim of the study was to investigate the change in the quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest and to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of data and prospective evaluation of quality of life included all patients surviving an IHCA and being treated by the emergency medical team between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint of the study was the quality of life after IHCA at the reference date. Secondary endpoints covered determination of risk factors and predictors of poor outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 604 patients were resuscitated within the period of 11 years and 61 (10%) patients survived until the interview took place. Finally, 48 (79%) patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 31 (65%) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of life before and after cardiac arrest (EQ-5D-5L utility 0.79 vs. 0.78, p = 0.567) and in the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of life before and after IHCA in survivors was good and comparable. The quality of life was mostly affected by reduced mobility and anxiety/depression. Future studies with larger patient samples should focus on potentially modifiable factors that could prevent, warn, and limit the consequences of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Moreover, research on outcomes of IHCA should include available tools for the quality of life assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest : An 11-year experience from an university center].\",\"authors\":\"Benedikt Treml, Christine Eckhardt, Christoph Oberleitner, Thomas Ploner, Christopher Rugg, Aleksandra Radovanovic Spurnic, Sasa Rajsic\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-024-01423-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent medical care and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Given that in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is still poorly investigated, data on health-associated quality of life thereafter remains scarce. The available evidence is mostly transferred from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest studies, but the epidemiology and determinants of success might be different. The aim of the study was to investigate the change in the quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest and to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of data and prospective evaluation of quality of life included all patients surviving an IHCA and being treated by the emergency medical team between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint of the study was the quality of life after IHCA at the reference date. Secondary endpoints covered determination of risk factors and predictors of poor outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 604 patients were resuscitated within the period of 11 years and 61 (10%) patients survived until the interview took place. Finally, 48 (79%) patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 31 (65%) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of life before and after cardiac arrest (EQ-5D-5L utility 0.79 vs. 0.78, p = 0.567) and in the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of life before and after IHCA in survivors was good and comparable. The quality of life was mostly affected by reduced mobility and anxiety/depression. Future studies with larger patient samples should focus on potentially modifiable factors that could prevent, warn, and limit the consequences of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Moreover, research on outcomes of IHCA should include available tools for the quality of life assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01423-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01423-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏骤停是一种危及生命的情况,需要紧急医疗护理,也是全球主要死亡原因之一。由于对院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的调查仍然很少,因此有关其后与健康相关的生活质量的数据仍然很少。现有证据大多来自院外心脏骤停研究,但流行病学和成功的决定因素可能有所不同。本研究旨在调查院内心脏骤停后生活质量的变化,并找出导致不良结局的潜在风险因素:这项回顾性数据分析和生活质量前瞻性评估包括 2010 年至 2020 年间所有在院内心脏骤停后存活并接受急救医疗团队治疗的患者。研究的主要终点是IHCA后在基准日期的生活质量。次要终点包括确定院内心肺复苏后不良预后的风险因素和预测因素:结果:11 年间,共有 604 名患者接受了复苏,其中 61 名(10%)患者在接受采访前一直存活。最后,48 名(79%)患者符合纳入标准,31 名(65%)患者被纳入研究。心脏骤停前后的生活质量(EQ-5D-5L效用0.79 vs. 0.78,p = 0.567)和EQ-5D-5L视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分没有明显差异:结论:IHCA术前和术后幸存者的生活质量良好,具有可比性。结论:幸存者在 IHCA 术前和术后的生活质量良好,具有可比性。生活质量主要受到活动能力下降和焦虑/抑郁的影响。未来针对更多患者样本的研究应重点关注可预防、警告和限制院内心脏骤停后果的潜在可改变因素。此外,对院内心脏骤停后果的研究应包括可用的生活质量评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest : An 11-year experience from an university center].

Background: Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent medical care and is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Given that in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is still poorly investigated, data on health-associated quality of life thereafter remains scarce. The available evidence is mostly transferred from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest studies, but the epidemiology and determinants of success might be different. The aim of the study was to investigate the change in the quality of life after in-hospital cardiac arrest and to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome.

Material and methods: This retrospective analysis of data and prospective evaluation of quality of life included all patients surviving an IHCA and being treated by the emergency medical team between 2010 and 2020. The primary endpoint of the study was the quality of life after IHCA at the reference date. Secondary endpoints covered determination of risk factors and predictors of poor outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Results: In total 604 patients were resuscitated within the period of 11 years and 61 (10%) patients survived until the interview took place. Finally, 48 (79%) patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 31 (65%) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the quality of life before and after cardiac arrest (EQ-5D-5L utility 0.79 vs. 0.78, p = 0.567) and in the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) score.

Conclusion: The quality of life before and after IHCA in survivors was good and comparable. The quality of life was mostly affected by reduced mobility and anxiety/depression. Future studies with larger patient samples should focus on potentially modifiable factors that could prevent, warn, and limit the consequences of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Moreover, research on outcomes of IHCA should include available tools for the quality of life assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信