为发展中国家印度尼西亚的遗传性视网膜营养不良症确定合适的基因检测工具。

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-05-01
A B I Perdamaian, R N Drupadi, E Aribowo, D K Paramita, M B Sasongko, S Supanji
{"title":"为发展中国家印度尼西亚的遗传性视网膜营养不良症确定合适的基因检测工具。","authors":"A B I Perdamaian, R N Drupadi, E Aribowo, D K Paramita, M B Sasongko, S Supanji","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) is a group of untreated genetic ocular diseases that mostly affect young people. The number of patients with IRD worldwide, including in developing countries, is growing each year. This literature review aimed to investigate the current utilised genetic screening of IRD worldwide and to propose the most feasible genetics test and diagnostic method for IRD in developing countries, especially Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Papers conducting wide genome sequencing, including panel sequencing (panel-seq), microarray, whole exome sequencing (WES), whole genome sequencing (WGS) and Sanger sequencing on patients with IRD, were included. Papers were sorted into several groups to visualise the sequencing technology's detection rate. Detection rate comparison analysis was done using the meta-regress protocol in the R program. Whereas the number of novel mutations in each testing tool each year was pooled and compared in the graph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After conducting the literature study, 37 papers were sorted from 451 results. Most studies conducted a panel-seq with 16 records followed by WES with seven records. The detection rate of the WES meta-analysis was 0.66, which was slightly better than the panel-seq with 0.55. The number of novel mutation discoveries fluctuated each year with panel-seq as the most prominent finder. Cost factors and the limitation of sequencing devices make panel-seq a more appropriate tool in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most effective selection for evaluated genetic testing was WES. Therefore, panel-seq is more suitable for first-tier genetic testing in Indonesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"79 3","pages":"342-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying an appropriate gene testing tool for inherited retinal dystrophy in Indonesia, a developing country.\",\"authors\":\"A B I Perdamaian, R N Drupadi, E Aribowo, D K Paramita, M B Sasongko, S Supanji\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) is a group of untreated genetic ocular diseases that mostly affect young people. The number of patients with IRD worldwide, including in developing countries, is growing each year. This literature review aimed to investigate the current utilised genetic screening of IRD worldwide and to propose the most feasible genetics test and diagnostic method for IRD in developing countries, especially Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Papers conducting wide genome sequencing, including panel sequencing (panel-seq), microarray, whole exome sequencing (WES), whole genome sequencing (WGS) and Sanger sequencing on patients with IRD, were included. Papers were sorted into several groups to visualise the sequencing technology's detection rate. Detection rate comparison analysis was done using the meta-regress protocol in the R program. Whereas the number of novel mutations in each testing tool each year was pooled and compared in the graph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After conducting the literature study, 37 papers were sorted from 451 results. Most studies conducted a panel-seq with 16 records followed by WES with seven records. The detection rate of the WES meta-analysis was 0.66, which was slightly better than the panel-seq with 0.55. The number of novel mutation discoveries fluctuated each year with panel-seq as the most prominent finder. Cost factors and the limitation of sequencing devices make panel-seq a more appropriate tool in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most effective selection for evaluated genetic testing was WES. Therefore, panel-seq is more suitable for first-tier genetic testing in Indonesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"342-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介遗传性视网膜营养不良症(IRD)是一组未经治疗的遗传性眼部疾病,多发于年轻人。全世界(包括发展中国家)的 IRD 患者人数逐年增加。本文献综述旨在调查目前世界范围内使用的 IRD 遗传学筛查方法,并为发展中国家(尤其是印度尼西亚)的 IRD 提出最可行的遗传学检测和诊断方法:在 PubMed 和谷歌学术数据库中进行了文献检索。纳入了对 IRD 患者进行全基因组测序的论文,包括面板测序(panel-seq)、微阵列、全外显子组测序(WES)、全基因组测序(WGS)和 Sanger 测序。为了直观地显示测序技术的检出率,我们将论文分成了几组。检测率比较分析是使用 R 程序中的元回归协议完成的。而每种检测工具每年的新型突变数量则汇集在一起,并在图表中进行比较:进行文献研究后,从 451 项结果中筛选出 37 篇论文。大多数研究都采用了panel-seq,有16条记录,其次是WES,有7条记录。WES荟萃分析的检出率为0.66,略高于panel-seq的0.55。新型突变的发现数量每年都有波动,其中以面板-测序的发现数量最多。在印度尼西亚,成本因素和测序设备的限制使面板-测序成为更合适的工具:结论:评估基因检测最有效的选择是 WES。因此,panel-seq 更适合印尼的一级基因检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying an appropriate gene testing tool for inherited retinal dystrophy in Indonesia, a developing country.

Introduction: Inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) is a group of untreated genetic ocular diseases that mostly affect young people. The number of patients with IRD worldwide, including in developing countries, is growing each year. This literature review aimed to investigate the current utilised genetic screening of IRD worldwide and to propose the most feasible genetics test and diagnostic method for IRD in developing countries, especially Indonesia.

Materials and methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Papers conducting wide genome sequencing, including panel sequencing (panel-seq), microarray, whole exome sequencing (WES), whole genome sequencing (WGS) and Sanger sequencing on patients with IRD, were included. Papers were sorted into several groups to visualise the sequencing technology's detection rate. Detection rate comparison analysis was done using the meta-regress protocol in the R program. Whereas the number of novel mutations in each testing tool each year was pooled and compared in the graph.

Results: After conducting the literature study, 37 papers were sorted from 451 results. Most studies conducted a panel-seq with 16 records followed by WES with seven records. The detection rate of the WES meta-analysis was 0.66, which was slightly better than the panel-seq with 0.55. The number of novel mutation discoveries fluctuated each year with panel-seq as the most prominent finder. Cost factors and the limitation of sequencing devices make panel-seq a more appropriate tool in Indonesia.

Conclusion: The most effective selection for evaluated genetic testing was WES. Therefore, panel-seq is more suitable for first-tier genetic testing in Indonesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信