基于放射组学和临床特征的高斯奈何贝叶斯(GNB)模型用于术前鉴别肺纯浸润性黏液腺癌和混合型黏液腺癌

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Junjie Zhang, Ligang Hao, Qian Xu, Fengxiao Gao
{"title":"基于放射组学和临床特征的高斯奈何贝叶斯(GNB)模型用于术前鉴别肺纯浸润性黏液腺癌和混合型黏液腺癌","authors":"Junjie Zhang, Ligang Hao, Qian Xu, Fengxiao Gao","doi":"10.1177/15330338241258415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate predictive models based on clinical parameters, and radiomic features to distinguish pulmonary pure invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (pIMA) from mixed mucinous adenocarcinoma (mIMA) before surgery. <b>Method:</b> From January 2017 to December 2022, 193 pIMA and 111 mIMA were retrospectively analyzed at our hospital in this retrospective study. From contrast-enhanced computed tomography, 1037 radiomic features were extracted. The patients were randomly divided into a training group and a test group (n = 213 and 91, respectively) in a 7:3 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used to select radiomic features. In this study, 9 machine learning radiomics prediction models were applied. The radiomics score was then calculated based on the best-performing machine learning model adopted. The clinical model was developed using the same machine learning model of radiomics. In the end, a combined model based on clinical factors and radiomics features was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model. <b>Results:</b> The combined model established by the Gaussian Naive Bayes machine learning method exhibited the best performance. The AUC of the combined model, clinical model, and radiomics model were 0.81, 0.80, and 0.68 in the training group and 0.91, 0.80, and 0.81 in the test group, respectively. The Brier scores of the combined model were 0.171 and 0.112. The DCA curve also showed that the combined model was beneficial to clinical settings. <b>Conclusion:</b> The combined model integration of radiomics features and clinical parameters may have potential value for the preoperative differentiation of pIMA from mIMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"23 ","pages":"15330338241258415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics and Clinical Characters Based Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Pulmonary Pure Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma From Mixed Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Junjie Zhang, Ligang Hao, Qian Xu, Fengxiao Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15330338241258415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate predictive models based on clinical parameters, and radiomic features to distinguish pulmonary pure invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (pIMA) from mixed mucinous adenocarcinoma (mIMA) before surgery. <b>Method:</b> From January 2017 to December 2022, 193 pIMA and 111 mIMA were retrospectively analyzed at our hospital in this retrospective study. From contrast-enhanced computed tomography, 1037 radiomic features were extracted. The patients were randomly divided into a training group and a test group (n = 213 and 91, respectively) in a 7:3 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used to select radiomic features. In this study, 9 machine learning radiomics prediction models were applied. The radiomics score was then calculated based on the best-performing machine learning model adopted. The clinical model was developed using the same machine learning model of radiomics. In the end, a combined model based on clinical factors and radiomics features was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model. <b>Results:</b> The combined model established by the Gaussian Naive Bayes machine learning method exhibited the best performance. The AUC of the combined model, clinical model, and radiomics model were 0.81, 0.80, and 0.68 in the training group and 0.91, 0.80, and 0.81 in the test group, respectively. The Brier scores of the combined model were 0.171 and 0.112. The DCA curve also showed that the combined model was beneficial to clinical settings. <b>Conclusion:</b> The combined model integration of radiomics features and clinical parameters may have potential value for the preoperative differentiation of pIMA from mIMA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"15330338241258415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11143847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241258415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241258415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的开发并验证基于临床参数和放射学特征的预测模型,以便在手术前区分肺纯浸润性粘液腺癌(pIMA)和混合型粘液腺癌(mIMA)。方法:2017年1月至2022年12月,我院对193例pIMA和111例mIMA进行了回顾性分析。从对比增强计算机断层扫描中提取了1037个放射学特征。患者按 7:3 的比例随机分为训练组和测试组(分别为 213 人和 91 人)。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子算法来选择放射学特征。在这项研究中,应用了 9 个机器学习放射组学预测模型。然后根据采用的表现最佳的机器学习模型计算放射组学得分。临床模型也是使用相同的放射组学机器学习模型开发的。最后,建立了一个基于临床因素和放射组学特征的综合模型。接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值和决策曲线分析(DCA)用于评估预测模型的临床实用性。结果显示采用高斯奈维贝叶斯机器学习方法建立的组合模型表现最佳。在训练组中,组合模型、临床模型和放射组学模型的AUC分别为0.81、0.80和0.68;在测试组中,组合模型、临床模型和放射组学模型的AUC分别为0.91、0.80和0.81。综合模型的 Brier 分数分别为 0.171 和 0.112。DCA 曲线也表明,组合模型对临床环境有益。结论整合放射组学特征和临床参数的联合模型可能对术前区分 pIMA 和 mIMA 有潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiomics and Clinical Characters Based Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) Model for Preoperative Differentiation of Pulmonary Pure Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma From Mixed Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

Objective: To develop and validate predictive models based on clinical parameters, and radiomic features to distinguish pulmonary pure invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (pIMA) from mixed mucinous adenocarcinoma (mIMA) before surgery. Method: From January 2017 to December 2022, 193 pIMA and 111 mIMA were retrospectively analyzed at our hospital in this retrospective study. From contrast-enhanced computed tomography, 1037 radiomic features were extracted. The patients were randomly divided into a training group and a test group (n = 213 and 91, respectively) in a 7:3 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used to select radiomic features. In this study, 9 machine learning radiomics prediction models were applied. The radiomics score was then calculated based on the best-performing machine learning model adopted. The clinical model was developed using the same machine learning model of radiomics. In the end, a combined model based on clinical factors and radiomics features was developed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the prediction model. Results: The combined model established by the Gaussian Naive Bayes machine learning method exhibited the best performance. The AUC of the combined model, clinical model, and radiomics model were 0.81, 0.80, and 0.68 in the training group and 0.91, 0.80, and 0.81 in the test group, respectively. The Brier scores of the combined model were 0.171 and 0.112. The DCA curve also showed that the combined model was beneficial to clinical settings. Conclusion: The combined model integration of radiomics features and clinical parameters may have potential value for the preoperative differentiation of pIMA from mIMA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信