流动评估抽样率入门。

IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lennart Seizer, Günter Schiepek, Germaine Cornelissen, Johanna Löchner
{"title":"流动评估抽样率入门。","authors":"Lennart Seizer, Günter Schiepek, Germaine Cornelissen, Johanna Löchner","doi":"10.1037/met0000656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of ambulatory assessments (AAs) as an approach to gather self-reported questionnaires or self-collected biochemical data is constantly increasing to investigate the experiences, states, and behaviors of individuals and their interaction with external situational factors during everyday life. It is often implicitly assumed that data from different sampling protocols can be used interchangeably, despite them assessing processes over different timescales in different intervals and at different occasions, which depending on the variables under study may result in fundamentally different dynamics. There are multiple temporal parameters to consider and while there is an abundance of sampling protocols that are applied regularly, to date, there is only limited empirical background on the influence different approaches may have on the data and findings. In this review, we aim to give an overview of commonly used types of AA in psychology, psychiatry, and biobehavioral research with a breakdown by temporal design parameters. Additionally, we discuss potential advantages and pitfalls associated with the various approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A primer on sampling rates of ambulatory assessments.\",\"authors\":\"Lennart Seizer, Günter Schiepek, Germaine Cornelissen, Johanna Löchner\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of ambulatory assessments (AAs) as an approach to gather self-reported questionnaires or self-collected biochemical data is constantly increasing to investigate the experiences, states, and behaviors of individuals and their interaction with external situational factors during everyday life. It is often implicitly assumed that data from different sampling protocols can be used interchangeably, despite them assessing processes over different timescales in different intervals and at different occasions, which depending on the variables under study may result in fundamentally different dynamics. There are multiple temporal parameters to consider and while there is an abundance of sampling protocols that are applied regularly, to date, there is only limited empirical background on the influence different approaches may have on the data and findings. In this review, we aim to give an overview of commonly used types of AA in psychology, psychiatry, and biobehavioral research with a breakdown by temporal design parameters. Additionally, we discuss potential advantages and pitfalls associated with the various approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000656\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000656","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了调查个人在日常生活中的经历、状态和行为,以及他们与外部环境因素之间的相互作用,越来越多地使用动态评估(AAs)作为收集自我报告问卷或自我收集生化数据的方法。尽管不同的取样方案在不同的时间尺度、不同的时间间隔和不同的场合评估不同的过程,根据所研究变量的不同,可能会产生根本不同的动态变化,但人们往往隐含地认为不同取样方案的数据可以互换使用。有多种时间参数需要考虑,虽然有大量定期使用的取样方案,但迄今为止,关于不同方法可能对数据和研究结果产生的影响,只有有限的经验背景。在本综述中,我们旨在概述心理学、精神病学和生物行为学研究中常用的 AA 类型,并按时间设计参数进行细分。此外,我们还讨论了与各种方法相关的潜在优势和缺陷。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A primer on sampling rates of ambulatory assessments.

The use of ambulatory assessments (AAs) as an approach to gather self-reported questionnaires or self-collected biochemical data is constantly increasing to investigate the experiences, states, and behaviors of individuals and their interaction with external situational factors during everyday life. It is often implicitly assumed that data from different sampling protocols can be used interchangeably, despite them assessing processes over different timescales in different intervals and at different occasions, which depending on the variables under study may result in fundamentally different dynamics. There are multiple temporal parameters to consider and while there is an abundance of sampling protocols that are applied regularly, to date, there is only limited empirical background on the influence different approaches may have on the data and findings. In this review, we aim to give an overview of commonly used types of AA in psychology, psychiatry, and biobehavioral research with a breakdown by temporal design parameters. Additionally, we discuss potential advantages and pitfalls associated with the various approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信