Julia E McGuinness, Garnet L Anderson, Simukayi Mutasa, Dawn L Hershman, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar, Danika L Lew, Monica Yee, Eric A Brown, Sebastien S Kairouz, Nafisa Kuwajerwala, Therese B Bevers, John E Doster, Corrine Zarwan, Laura Kruper, Lori M Minasian, Leslie Ford, Banu Arun, Marian L Neuhouser, Gary E Goodman, Powel H Brown, Richard Ha, Katherine D Crew
{"title":"补充维生素 D 对 SWOG S0812 中基于深度学习的乳房 X 线照相术评估的影响。","authors":"Julia E McGuinness, Garnet L Anderson, Simukayi Mutasa, Dawn L Hershman, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar, Danika L Lew, Monica Yee, Eric A Brown, Sebastien S Kairouz, Nafisa Kuwajerwala, Therese B Bevers, John E Doster, Corrine Zarwan, Laura Kruper, Lori M Minasian, Leslie Ford, Banu Arun, Marian L Neuhouser, Gary E Goodman, Powel H Brown, Richard Ha, Katherine D Crew","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812.\",\"authors\":\"Julia E McGuinness, Garnet L Anderson, Simukayi Mutasa, Dawn L Hershman, Mary Beth Terry, Parisa Tehranifar, Danika L Lew, Monica Yee, Eric A Brown, Sebastien S Kairouz, Nafisa Kuwajerwala, Therese B Bevers, John E Doster, Corrine Zarwan, Laura Kruper, Lori M Minasian, Leslie Ford, Banu Arun, Marian L Neuhouser, Gary E Goodman, Powel H Brown, Richard Ha, Katherine D Crew\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkae042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于深度学习的乳房 X 线照片评估可以无创评估对乳腺癌(BC)化学预防的反应。我们评估了基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的乳腺癌风险模型的变化,该模型适用于参加 SWOG S0812 研究的妇女的乳房 X 光照片,该研究将 208 名绝经前高危妇女随机分为每周口服维生素 D3 20,000IU 或安慰剂 12 个月。我们将 CNN 模型应用于基线(109 人)、12 个月(97 人)和 24 个月(67 人)收集的乳房 X 光照片,并比较了不同治疗组 CNN 风险评分的变化。在12个月和24个月时,维生素D组和安慰剂组的CNN评分变化均无明显差异(0.005 vs. 0.002,p = 0.875),也无明显差异(0.020 vs. 0.001,p = 0.563)。这些研究结果与 S0812 的主要分析结果一致,即与安慰剂相比,维生素 D 补充剂未显示出 MD 的显著变化。目前需要对新型 BC 化学预防药物反应的生物标志物进行评估。
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812.
Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.