非洲多基因预测体重指数的变异性。

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Tinashe Chikowore, Kristi Läll, Lisa K Micklesfield, Zane Lombard, Julia H Goedecke, Segun Fatumo, Shane A Norris, Reedik Magi, Michele Ramsay, Paul W Franks, Guillaume Pare, Andrew P Morris
{"title":"非洲多基因预测体重指数的变异性。","authors":"Tinashe Chikowore, Kristi Läll, Lisa K Micklesfield, Zane Lombard, Julia H Goedecke, Segun Fatumo, Shane A Norris, Reedik Magi, Michele Ramsay, Paul W Franks, Guillaume Pare, Andrew P Morris","doi":"10.1186/s13073-024-01348-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polygenic prediction studies in continental Africans are scarce. Africa's genetic and environmental diversity pose a challenge that limits the generalizability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for body mass index (BMI) within the continent. Studies to understand the factors that affect PRS variability within Africa are required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the first multi-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis for BMI involving continental Africans, we derived a multi-ancestry PRS and compared its performance to a European ancestry-specific PRS in continental Africans (AWI-Gen study) and a European cohort (Estonian Biobank). We then evaluated the factors affecting the performance of the PRS in Africans which included fine-mapping resolution, allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium patterns, and PRS-environment interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Polygenic prediction of BMI in continental Africans is poor compared to that in European ancestry individuals. However, we show that the multi-ancestry PRS is more predictive than the European ancestry-specific PRS due to its improved fine-mapping resolution. We noted regional variation in polygenic prediction across Africa's East, South, and West regions, which was driven by a complex interplay of the PRS with environmental factors, such as physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the role of gene-environment interactions in PRS prediction variability in Africa. PRS methods that correct for these interactions, coupled with the increased representation of Africans in GWAS, may improve PRS prediction in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11140909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability of polygenic prediction for body mass index in Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Tinashe Chikowore, Kristi Läll, Lisa K Micklesfield, Zane Lombard, Julia H Goedecke, Segun Fatumo, Shane A Norris, Reedik Magi, Michele Ramsay, Paul W Franks, Guillaume Pare, Andrew P Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13073-024-01348-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polygenic prediction studies in continental Africans are scarce. Africa's genetic and environmental diversity pose a challenge that limits the generalizability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for body mass index (BMI) within the continent. Studies to understand the factors that affect PRS variability within Africa are required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the first multi-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis for BMI involving continental Africans, we derived a multi-ancestry PRS and compared its performance to a European ancestry-specific PRS in continental Africans (AWI-Gen study) and a European cohort (Estonian Biobank). We then evaluated the factors affecting the performance of the PRS in Africans which included fine-mapping resolution, allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium patterns, and PRS-environment interactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Polygenic prediction of BMI in continental Africans is poor compared to that in European ancestry individuals. However, we show that the multi-ancestry PRS is more predictive than the European ancestry-specific PRS due to its improved fine-mapping resolution. We noted regional variation in polygenic prediction across Africa's East, South, and West regions, which was driven by a complex interplay of the PRS with environmental factors, such as physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the role of gene-environment interactions in PRS prediction variability in Africa. PRS methods that correct for these interactions, coupled with the increased representation of Africans in GWAS, may improve PRS prediction in Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11140909/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01348-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01348-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对非洲大陆人的多基因预测研究很少。非洲的遗传和环境多样性构成了一项挑战,限制了体质指数(BMI)多基因风险评分(PRS)在非洲大陆的通用性。需要开展研究以了解影响非洲内部 PRS 变异性的因素:方法:通过首次针对非洲大陆人体重指数的多种系全基因组关联研究(GWAS)荟萃分析,我们得出了多种系体重指数风险评分,并将其与非洲大陆人的欧洲血统特异性体重指数风险评分(AWI-Gen 研究)和欧洲队列(爱沙尼亚生物库)进行了比较。然后,我们评估了影响非洲人PRS性能的因素,包括精细图谱分辨率、等位基因频率、连锁不平衡模式以及PRS与环境的相互作用:结果:与欧洲血统的个体相比,非洲大陆人的多基因预测体重指数较差。然而,我们发现,由于其精细图谱分辨率的提高,多血统 PRS 比欧洲血统特异性 PRS 更具预测性。我们注意到,非洲东部、南部和西部地区的多基因预测存在地区差异,这主要是由于PRS与环境因素(如体育锻炼、吸烟、酒精摄入量和社会经济地位)之间复杂的相互作用所致:我们的研究结果凸显了基因与环境相互作用在非洲 PRS 预测变异中的作用。校正这些相互作用的 PRS 方法,加上非洲人在全球基因组研究中的代表性增加,可能会改善非洲的 PRS 预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability of polygenic prediction for body mass index in Africa.

Background: Polygenic prediction studies in continental Africans are scarce. Africa's genetic and environmental diversity pose a challenge that limits the generalizability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for body mass index (BMI) within the continent. Studies to understand the factors that affect PRS variability within Africa are required.

Methods: Using the first multi-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis for BMI involving continental Africans, we derived a multi-ancestry PRS and compared its performance to a European ancestry-specific PRS in continental Africans (AWI-Gen study) and a European cohort (Estonian Biobank). We then evaluated the factors affecting the performance of the PRS in Africans which included fine-mapping resolution, allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium patterns, and PRS-environment interactions.

Results: Polygenic prediction of BMI in continental Africans is poor compared to that in European ancestry individuals. However, we show that the multi-ancestry PRS is more predictive than the European ancestry-specific PRS due to its improved fine-mapping resolution. We noted regional variation in polygenic prediction across Africa's East, South, and West regions, which was driven by a complex interplay of the PRS with environmental factors, such as physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, and socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the role of gene-environment interactions in PRS prediction variability in Africa. PRS methods that correct for these interactions, coupled with the increased representation of Africans in GWAS, may improve PRS prediction in Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信