Shruthi Narasimha, Sukhjinder Chauhan, Roger Nehaul, Jeffrey Cummings, Susan Wright, Alexis Patterson, Raymond Mullins, William Messina, Brian Zilka, Ana Kraus
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间改进大肠癌筛查中粪便免疫化学检验的采集。","authors":"Shruthi Narasimha, Sukhjinder Chauhan, Roger Nehaul, Jeffrey Cummings, Susan Wright, Alexis Patterson, Raymond Mullins, William Messina, Brian Zilka, Ana Kraus","doi":"10.12788/fp.0455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy is a first-line method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, cost-effective noninvasive tests, such as high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), are also used. The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on CRC screening rates. The James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital (JAHVAH) continued socially distant CRC screening using FITs, but encountered inefficiencies due to high rates of incorrectly collected FIT samples. A quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to increase correctly collected and testable FIT kits upon initial laboratory submission.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>The ambulatory QI project sought out root causes for incorrectly returned FITs and proposed Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles based on a series of approved action plans. A multidisciplinary team of laboratory, nursing, administrative, and primary care staff worked together to discover 6 major root causes. Our multipronged PDSA cycle attempted to set up redundant patient reminders, centralize the FIT dispersal process, and make the patient-FIT interface more user-friendly. All PDSA solutions were implemented over 4 months. Lack of collection date was the most common reason for incorrectly returned FIT kits and the focus of PDSA improvements. The rate of FITs with missing collection dates dropped from 24% prior to PDSA to 14% in April 2021. The rate of correctly returned FIT kits rose from 38% before the project to 72% afterwards, surpassing the 20% improvement goal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT is a useful method for CRC screening that can be particularly helpful when in-person visits are limited, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in demand for FITs during the pandemic revealed process deficiencies and gave JAHVAH an opportunity to improve workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection for Colorectal Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Shruthi Narasimha, Sukhjinder Chauhan, Roger Nehaul, Jeffrey Cummings, Susan Wright, Alexis Patterson, Raymond Mullins, William Messina, Brian Zilka, Ana Kraus\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy is a first-line method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, cost-effective noninvasive tests, such as high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), are also used. The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on CRC screening rates. The James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital (JAHVAH) continued socially distant CRC screening using FITs, but encountered inefficiencies due to high rates of incorrectly collected FIT samples. A quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to increase correctly collected and testable FIT kits upon initial laboratory submission.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>The ambulatory QI project sought out root causes for incorrectly returned FITs and proposed Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles based on a series of approved action plans. A multidisciplinary team of laboratory, nursing, administrative, and primary care staff worked together to discover 6 major root causes. Our multipronged PDSA cycle attempted to set up redundant patient reminders, centralize the FIT dispersal process, and make the patient-FIT interface more user-friendly. All PDSA solutions were implemented over 4 months. Lack of collection date was the most common reason for incorrectly returned FIT kits and the focus of PDSA improvements. The rate of FITs with missing collection dates dropped from 24% prior to PDSA to 14% in April 2021. The rate of correctly returned FIT kits rose from 38% before the project to 72% afterwards, surpassing the 20% improvement goal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT is a useful method for CRC screening that can be particularly helpful when in-person visits are limited, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in demand for FITs during the pandemic revealed process deficiencies and gave JAHVAH an opportunity to improve workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11132107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:结肠镜检查是结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的一线方法。然而,高灵敏度愈创木酚粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)和粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)等经济有效的非侵入性检查也在使用。COVID-19 大流行对 CRC 筛查率产生了很大的负面影响。James A. Haley 退伍军人事务医院 (James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital,JAHVAH) 继续在社会上使用 FIT 进行远距离 CRC 筛查,但由于 FIT 样本采集错误率较高,导致筛查效率低下。该医院开展了一项质量改进(QI)项目,以提高实验室初次提交的 FIT 套件的正确采集率和可检测率:门诊质量改进项目找出了错误退回 FIT 的根本原因,并根据一系列已获批准的行动计划提出了 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)循环。由实验室、护理、行政和基础护理人员组成的多学科团队共同努力,发现了 6 个主要的根本原因。我们多管齐下的 PDSA 循环尝试设置多余的患者提醒、集中 FIT 分散流程,并使患者-FIT 界面更加友好。所有 PDSA 解决方案均在 4 个月内实施完毕。缺少采集日期是错误退回 FIT 套件的最常见原因,也是 PDSA 改进的重点。缺少采集日期的 FIT 比例从实施 PDSA 之前的 24% 降至 2021 年 4 月的 14%。正确退回 FIT 工具包的比率从项目实施前的 38% 上升到项目实施后的 72%,超过了 20% 的改进目标:结论:FIT 是一种有效的 CRC 筛查方法,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,当上门服务受到限制时,这种方法尤其有用。大流行期间对 FIT 需求的增加暴露了流程的不足,为 JAHVAH 提供了改进工作流程的机会。
Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection for Colorectal Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Background: Colonoscopy is a first-line method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, cost-effective noninvasive tests, such as high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), are also used. The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on CRC screening rates. The James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital (JAHVAH) continued socially distant CRC screening using FITs, but encountered inefficiencies due to high rates of incorrectly collected FIT samples. A quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to increase correctly collected and testable FIT kits upon initial laboratory submission.
Observations: The ambulatory QI project sought out root causes for incorrectly returned FITs and proposed Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles based on a series of approved action plans. A multidisciplinary team of laboratory, nursing, administrative, and primary care staff worked together to discover 6 major root causes. Our multipronged PDSA cycle attempted to set up redundant patient reminders, centralize the FIT dispersal process, and make the patient-FIT interface more user-friendly. All PDSA solutions were implemented over 4 months. Lack of collection date was the most common reason for incorrectly returned FIT kits and the focus of PDSA improvements. The rate of FITs with missing collection dates dropped from 24% prior to PDSA to 14% in April 2021. The rate of correctly returned FIT kits rose from 38% before the project to 72% afterwards, surpassing the 20% improvement goal.
Conclusions: FIT is a useful method for CRC screening that can be particularly helpful when in-person visits are limited, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in demand for FITs during the pandemic revealed process deficiencies and gave JAHVAH an opportunity to improve workflow.