溴夫定治疗带状疱疹的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Jiaxing Chen, Dongyun Lei, Peng Cao, Junchen He, Litao Zhang
{"title":"溴夫定治疗带状疱疹的疗效和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Jiaxing Chen, Dongyun Lei, Peng Cao, Junchen He, Litao Zhang","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2355256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Brivudine has been used in herpes zoster (HZ) treatment for years, but the safety and efficacy of brivudine are inconclusive. Here we perform a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, safety, incidence of postherpetic neuralgia of brivudine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of randomized controlled Trials (RCTS) were obtained from the databases of both English (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Journal Database, and WanFang Database) literatures from inception to 12 September 2022. Meta-analyses of efficacy and safety of Brivudine for the treatment of herpes zoster for RCTS were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses included seven RCTS (2095 patients in experimental group and 2076 patients in control group) in the treatment of HZ with brivudine. It suggested that the brivudine group was superior to the control group in terms of efficacy (<i>p</i> = .0002) and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (<i>p</i> = .04). But the incidence of adverse reactions has no significant difference between the brivudine and the control groups (<i>p</i> = .22). In addition, subgroup analysis of adverse events also showed that brivudine was about the same safety as other modalities in the treatment of HZ (<i>p</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brivudine is effective for HZ. However, the evidence on the safety of brivudine is insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2355256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of brivudine for the treatment of herpes zoster: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxing Chen, Dongyun Lei, Peng Cao, Junchen He, Litao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2024.2355256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Brivudine has been used in herpes zoster (HZ) treatment for years, but the safety and efficacy of brivudine are inconclusive. Here we perform a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, safety, incidence of postherpetic neuralgia of brivudine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of randomized controlled Trials (RCTS) were obtained from the databases of both English (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Journal Database, and WanFang Database) literatures from inception to 12 September 2022. Meta-analyses of efficacy and safety of Brivudine for the treatment of herpes zoster for RCTS were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses included seven RCTS (2095 patients in experimental group and 2076 patients in control group) in the treatment of HZ with brivudine. It suggested that the brivudine group was superior to the control group in terms of efficacy (<i>p</i> = .0002) and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (<i>p</i> = .04). But the incidence of adverse reactions has no significant difference between the brivudine and the control groups (<i>p</i> = .22). In addition, subgroup analysis of adverse events also showed that brivudine was about the same safety as other modalities in the treatment of HZ (<i>p</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brivudine is effective for HZ. However, the evidence on the safety of brivudine is insufficient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"2355256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2355256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2355256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:布夫定用于带状疱疹(HZ)治疗已有多年,但其安全性和有效性尚无定论。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估溴夫定的疗效、安全性和带状疱疹后遗神经痛的发生率:方法:从英文数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library)和中文数据库(中国知网、中国科学期刊目录数据库和万方数据库)中获取从开始到 2022 年 9 月 12 日的随机对照试验(RCTS)数据。对布里夫定治疗带状疱疹的疗效和安全性进行了Meta分析:结果:分析纳入了用溴夫定治疗带状疱疹的 7 个 RCTS(实验组 2095 例患者,对照组 2076 例患者)。结果表明,在疗效(P = 0.0002)和带状疱疹后遗神经痛发生率(P = 0.04)方面,试验组均优于对照组。但在不良反应发生率方面,溴夫定组与对照组无显著差异(p = 0.22)。此外,不良反应的亚组分析还显示,溴夫定在治疗HZ方面与其他方式的安全性大致相同(p > .05):结论:溴夫定对 HZ 有效。结论:溴夫定对 HZ 有效,但有关溴夫定安全性的证据不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of brivudine for the treatment of herpes zoster: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and objective: Brivudine has been used in herpes zoster (HZ) treatment for years, but the safety and efficacy of brivudine are inconclusive. Here we perform a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, safety, incidence of postherpetic neuralgia of brivudine.

Methods: Data of randomized controlled Trials (RCTS) were obtained from the databases of both English (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Journal Database, and WanFang Database) literatures from inception to 12 September 2022. Meta-analyses of efficacy and safety of Brivudine for the treatment of herpes zoster for RCTS were conducted.

Results: The analyses included seven RCTS (2095 patients in experimental group and 2076 patients in control group) in the treatment of HZ with brivudine. It suggested that the brivudine group was superior to the control group in terms of efficacy (p = .0002) and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia (p = .04). But the incidence of adverse reactions has no significant difference between the brivudine and the control groups (p = .22). In addition, subgroup analysis of adverse events also showed that brivudine was about the same safety as other modalities in the treatment of HZ (p > .05).

Conclusions: Brivudine is effective for HZ. However, the evidence on the safety of brivudine is insufficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信