肿瘤治疗药物监测指南:我们知道什么以及如何前进?系统综述的启示。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241250130
Xinya Li, Zaiwei Song, Zhanmiao Yi, Jiguang Qin, Dan Jiang, Zhitong Wang, Huibo Li, Rongsheng Zhao
{"title":"肿瘤治疗药物监测指南:我们知道什么以及如何前进?系统综述的启示。","authors":"Xinya Li, Zaiwei Song, Zhanmiao Yi, Jiguang Qin, Dan Jiang, Zhitong Wang, Huibo Li, Rongsheng Zhao","doi":"10.1177/17588359241250130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared with anti-infective drugs, immunosuppressants and other fields, the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology is somewhat limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of TDM guidelines for antineoplastic drugs and to promote the development of individualized drug therapy in oncology.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study type is a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>This study was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the official websites of TDM-related associations and Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted data. The methodological and reporting quality was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), respectively. Recommendations and quality evaluation results were presented by visual plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022325661).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies were included, with publication years ranging from 2014 to 2022. From the perspective of guideline development, two guidelines were developed using evidence-based methods. Among the included guidelines, four guidelines were for cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs, three for small molecule kinase inhibitors, and one for antineoplastic biosimilars. Currently available guidelines and clinical practice provided recommendations of individualized medication in oncology based on TDM, as well as influencing factors. With regard to methodological quality based on AGREE II, the average overall quality score was 55.21%. As for the reporting quality by RIGHT evaluation, the average reporting rate was 53.57%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the perspective of current guidelines, TDM in oncology is now being expanded from cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs to newer targeted treatments. Whereas, the types of antineoplastic drugs involved are still small, and there is still room for quality improvement. Furthermore, the reflected gaps warrant future studies into the exposure-response relationships and population pharmacokinetics models.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines in oncology: what do we know and how to move forward? Insights from a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Xinya Li, Zaiwei Song, Zhanmiao Yi, Jiguang Qin, Dan Jiang, Zhitong Wang, Huibo Li, Rongsheng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359241250130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared with anti-infective drugs, immunosuppressants and other fields, the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology is somewhat limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of TDM guidelines for antineoplastic drugs and to promote the development of individualized drug therapy in oncology.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study type is a systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>This study was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the official websites of TDM-related associations and Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted data. The methodological and reporting quality was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), respectively. Recommendations and quality evaluation results were presented by visual plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022325661).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies were included, with publication years ranging from 2014 to 2022. From the perspective of guideline development, two guidelines were developed using evidence-based methods. Among the included guidelines, four guidelines were for cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs, three for small molecule kinase inhibitors, and one for antineoplastic biosimilars. Currently available guidelines and clinical practice provided recommendations of individualized medication in oncology based on TDM, as well as influencing factors. With regard to methodological quality based on AGREE II, the average overall quality score was 55.21%. As for the reporting quality by RIGHT evaluation, the average reporting rate was 53.57%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the perspective of current guidelines, TDM in oncology is now being expanded from cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs to newer targeted treatments. Whereas, the types of antineoplastic drugs involved are still small, and there is still room for quality improvement. Furthermore, the reflected gaps warrant future studies into the exposure-response relationships and population pharmacokinetics models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241250130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241250130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与抗感染药物、免疫抑制剂和其他领域相比,治疗药物监测(TDM)在肿瘤学中的应用非常有限:与抗感染药物、免疫抑制剂等领域相比,治疗药物监测(TDM)在肿瘤学中的应用受到一定限制:我们旨在全面了解抗肿瘤药物的 TDM 指南,促进肿瘤学中个体化药物治疗的发展:本研究为系统综述:本研究根据《2020 年系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目声明》执行和报告。全面检索了截至 2023 年 3 月的数据库,包括 PubMed、Embase、TDM 相关协会的官方网站和中文数据库。两名研究人员独立筛选文献并提取数据。方法学和报告质量分别采用研究与评价指南评估II(AGREE II)和医疗实践指南报告项目(RIGHT)进行评估。建议和质量评估结果以直观图的形式呈现。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册(编号:CRD42022325661):结果:共纳入 8 项研究,发表年份从 2014 年到 2022 年不等。从指南制定的角度来看,有两份指南是采用循证方法制定的。在纳入的指南中,有4份指南针对细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物,3份针对小分子激酶抑制剂,1份针对抗肿瘤生物仿制药。现有指南和临床实践提供了基于TDM的肿瘤学个体化用药建议以及影响因素。在基于 AGREE II 的方法学质量方面,平均总体质量得分率为 55.21%。结论:从目前的指南来看,肿瘤学中的 TDM 正在从细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物扩展到更新的靶向治疗。但涉及的抗肿瘤药物种类仍然较少,质量仍有提高的空间。此外,所反映出的差距也需要今后对暴露-反应关系和群体药代动力学模型进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines in oncology: what do we know and how to move forward? Insights from a systematic review.

Background: Compared with anti-infective drugs, immunosuppressants and other fields, the application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology is somewhat limited.

Objective: We aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of TDM guidelines for antineoplastic drugs and to promote the development of individualized drug therapy in oncology.

Design: This study type is a systematic review.

Data sources and methods: This study was performed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Databases including PubMed, Embase, the official websites of TDM-related associations and Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted data. The methodological and reporting quality was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT), respectively. Recommendations and quality evaluation results were presented by visual plots. This study was registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42022325661).

Results: A total of eight studies were included, with publication years ranging from 2014 to 2022. From the perspective of guideline development, two guidelines were developed using evidence-based methods. Among the included guidelines, four guidelines were for cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs, three for small molecule kinase inhibitors, and one for antineoplastic biosimilars. Currently available guidelines and clinical practice provided recommendations of individualized medication in oncology based on TDM, as well as influencing factors. With regard to methodological quality based on AGREE II, the average overall quality score was 55.21%. As for the reporting quality by RIGHT evaluation, the average reporting rate was 53.57%.

Conclusion: From the perspective of current guidelines, TDM in oncology is now being expanded from cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs to newer targeted treatments. Whereas, the types of antineoplastic drugs involved are still small, and there is still room for quality improvement. Furthermore, the reflected gaps warrant future studies into the exposure-response relationships and population pharmacokinetics models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信