基于放射组学预测脑转移瘤患者术后立体定向放射治疗的局部控制情况。

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Josef A Buchner, Florian Kofler, Michael Mayinger, Sebastian M Christ, Thomas B Brunner, Andrea Wittig, Bjoern Menze, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Meyer, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke, Rami A El Shafie, Jürgen Debus, Susanne Rogers, Oliver Riesterer, Katrin Schulze, Horst J Feldmann, Oliver Blanck, Constantinos Zamboglou, Konstantinos Ferentinos, Angelika Bilger-Zähringer, Anca L Grosu, Robert Wolff, Marie Piraud, Kerstin A Eitz, Stephanie E Combs, Denise Bernhardt, Daniel Rueckert, Benedikt Wiestler, Jan C Peeken
{"title":"基于放射组学预测脑转移瘤患者术后立体定向放射治疗的局部控制情况。","authors":"Josef A Buchner, Florian Kofler, Michael Mayinger, Sebastian M Christ, Thomas B Brunner, Andrea Wittig, Bjoern Menze, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Meyer, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke, Rami A El Shafie, Jürgen Debus, Susanne Rogers, Oliver Riesterer, Katrin Schulze, Horst J Feldmann, Oliver Blanck, Constantinos Zamboglou, Konstantinos Ferentinos, Angelika Bilger-Zähringer, Anca L Grosu, Robert Wolff, Marie Piraud, Kerstin A Eitz, Stephanie E Combs, Denise Bernhardt, Daniel Rueckert, Benedikt Wiestler, Jan C Peeken","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with large or symptomatic brain metastases (BMs). Despite improved local control after adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy, the risk of local failure (LF) persists. Therefore, we aimed to develop and externally validate a pre-therapeutic radiomics-based prediction tool to identify patients at high LF risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from A Multicenter Analysis of Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Resection Cavity of BMs (AURORA) retrospective study (training cohort: 253 patients from 2 centers; external test cohort: 99 patients from 5 centers). Radiomic features were extracted from the contrast-enhancing BM (T1-CE MRI sequence) and the surrounding edema (T2-FLAIR sequence). Different combinations of radiomic and clinical features were compared. The final models were trained on the entire training cohort with the best parameter set previously determined by internal 5-fold cross-validation and tested on the external test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performance in the external test was achieved by an elastic net regression model trained with a combination of radiomic and clinical features with a concordance index (CI) of 0.77, outperforming any clinical model (best CI: 0.70). The model effectively stratified patients by LF risk in a Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < .001) and demonstrated an incremental net clinical benefit. At 24 months, we found LF in 9% and 74% of the low and high-risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of clinical and radiomic features predicted freedom from LF better than any clinical feature set alone. Patients at high risk for LF may benefit from stricter follow-up routines or intensified therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics-based prediction of local control in patients with brain metastases following postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Josef A Buchner, Florian Kofler, Michael Mayinger, Sebastian M Christ, Thomas B Brunner, Andrea Wittig, Bjoern Menze, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Meyer, Matthias Guckenberger, Nicolaus Andratschke, Rami A El Shafie, Jürgen Debus, Susanne Rogers, Oliver Riesterer, Katrin Schulze, Horst J Feldmann, Oliver Blanck, Constantinos Zamboglou, Konstantinos Ferentinos, Angelika Bilger-Zähringer, Anca L Grosu, Robert Wolff, Marie Piraud, Kerstin A Eitz, Stephanie E Combs, Denise Bernhardt, Daniel Rueckert, Benedikt Wiestler, Jan C Peeken\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noae098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with large or symptomatic brain metastases (BMs). Despite improved local control after adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy, the risk of local failure (LF) persists. Therefore, we aimed to develop and externally validate a pre-therapeutic radiomics-based prediction tool to identify patients at high LF risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from A Multicenter Analysis of Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Resection Cavity of BMs (AURORA) retrospective study (training cohort: 253 patients from 2 centers; external test cohort: 99 patients from 5 centers). Radiomic features were extracted from the contrast-enhancing BM (T1-CE MRI sequence) and the surrounding edema (T2-FLAIR sequence). Different combinations of radiomic and clinical features were compared. The final models were trained on the entire training cohort with the best parameter set previously determined by internal 5-fold cross-validation and tested on the external test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performance in the external test was achieved by an elastic net regression model trained with a combination of radiomic and clinical features with a concordance index (CI) of 0.77, outperforming any clinical model (best CI: 0.70). The model effectively stratified patients by LF risk in a Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < .001) and demonstrated an incremental net clinical benefit. At 24 months, we found LF in 9% and 74% of the low and high-risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of clinical and radiomic features predicted freedom from LF better than any clinical feature set alone. Patients at high risk for LF may benefit from stricter follow-up routines or intensified therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae098\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术切除是治疗巨大或无症状脑转移瘤(BMs)患者的标准方法。尽管辅助立体定向放疗后局部控制有所改善,但局部失败(LF)的风险依然存在。因此,我们旨在开发并从外部验证一种基于治疗前放射组学的预测工具,以识别局部放疗失败高风险患者:数据来自脑转移灶切除腔立体定向放射治疗多中心分析(AURORA)回顾性研究(训练队列:来自两个中心的253名患者;外部测试队列:来自五个中心的99名患者)。从对比度增强的BM(T1-CE MRI序列)和周围水肿(FLAIR序列)中提取放射学特征。对放射学特征和临床特征的不同组合进行了比较。最终的模型在整个训练队列中进行训练,并使用之前通过内部 5 倍交叉验证确定的最佳参数集,然后在外部测试集上进行测试:外部测试中表现最好的是结合放射学和临床特征训练的弹性网回归模型,其一致性指数(CI)为 0.77,优于任何临床模型(最佳 CI:0.70)。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,该模型有效地根据 LF 风险对患者进行了分层(p < 0.001),并显示出增量净临床获益。24个月时,我们发现低风险组和高风险组分别有9%和74%的患者出现LF:结合临床和放射学特征预测 LF 的发生率要优于单独使用任何一组临床特征。LF高风险患者可能会从更严格的随访程序或强化治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiomics-based prediction of local control in patients with brain metastases following postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy.

Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with large or symptomatic brain metastases (BMs). Despite improved local control after adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy, the risk of local failure (LF) persists. Therefore, we aimed to develop and externally validate a pre-therapeutic radiomics-based prediction tool to identify patients at high LF risk.

Methods: Data were collected from A Multicenter Analysis of Stereotactic Radiotherapy to the Resection Cavity of BMs (AURORA) retrospective study (training cohort: 253 patients from 2 centers; external test cohort: 99 patients from 5 centers). Radiomic features were extracted from the contrast-enhancing BM (T1-CE MRI sequence) and the surrounding edema (T2-FLAIR sequence). Different combinations of radiomic and clinical features were compared. The final models were trained on the entire training cohort with the best parameter set previously determined by internal 5-fold cross-validation and tested on the external test set.

Results: The best performance in the external test was achieved by an elastic net regression model trained with a combination of radiomic and clinical features with a concordance index (CI) of 0.77, outperforming any clinical model (best CI: 0.70). The model effectively stratified patients by LF risk in a Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < .001) and demonstrated an incremental net clinical benefit. At 24 months, we found LF in 9% and 74% of the low and high-risk groups, respectively.

Conclusions: A combination of clinical and radiomic features predicted freedom from LF better than any clinical feature set alone. Patients at high risk for LF may benefit from stricter follow-up routines or intensified therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信