通过甲基化分析检测基于人群的宫颈癌筛查计划中 hrHPV 阳性自我样本中的 CIN3+。

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Jolien de Waard , Arkajyoti Bhattacharya , Martine T. de Boer , Bettien M. van Hemel , Martha D. Esajas , Karin M. Vermeulen , Geertruida H. de Bock , Ed Schuuring , G. Bea A. Wisman
{"title":"通过甲基化分析检测基于人群的宫颈癌筛查计划中 hrHPV 阳性自我样本中的 CIN3+。","authors":"Jolien de Waard ,&nbsp;Arkajyoti Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Martine T. de Boer ,&nbsp;Bettien M. van Hemel ,&nbsp;Martha D. Esajas ,&nbsp;Karin M. Vermeulen ,&nbsp;Geertruida H. de Bock ,&nbsp;Ed Schuuring ,&nbsp;G. Bea A. Wisman","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since 2017, a self-sampling device has been introduced to the Dutch population-based screening program to enable higher participation rates. However, routine triage cytology cannot be performed on self-sampling material. Methylation is an alternative triage method that can be performed directly on DNA extracted from self-samples. Recently, we tested a set of 15 published cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+)-specific methylation markers and found a panel of 3 markers with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 74%. In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of 2 commercial assays using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. DNA from the same cohort of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive self-sampled material obtained through the population-based screening program in the North of the Netherlands from women with CIN2 or less (&lt;CIN3, n = 208) and women with CIN3+ (n = 96) was used. The QIAsure methylation test (consisting of 2 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 72%, whereas the Gyntect assay (consisting of 6 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 91% for CIN3+. When we compared all individual 23 methylation markers, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of ≥0.7 for 11 of 23 markers (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). By model-based recursive partitioning and robustness analysis, we found a panel with a better sensitivity compared with QIAsure and Gyntect (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). This new panel, consisting of <em>ITGA4</em>, <em>ASCL1</em>, and <em>FAM19A4,</em> has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 70%, similar to our previously identified panel (<em>ANKRD18CP</em>, <em>LHX8</em>, and <em>EPB41L3</em>). Thus, in addition to our previously identified panel, the combination of <em>ITGA4</em>, <em>ASCL1</em>, and <em>FAM19A4</em> showed good diagnostic performance and potentially can replace cytology, thereby avoiding additional doctor visits for many women worldwide and reducing the time for decision making for referral to the gynecologist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":"37 8","pages":"Article 100528"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089339522400108X/pdfft?md5=7f039bde8c816265f35e7c8861ad19d9&pid=1-s2.0-S089339522400108X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methylation Analysis to Detect CIN3+ in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive Self-Samples From the Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Program\",\"authors\":\"Jolien de Waard ,&nbsp;Arkajyoti Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Martine T. de Boer ,&nbsp;Bettien M. van Hemel ,&nbsp;Martha D. Esajas ,&nbsp;Karin M. Vermeulen ,&nbsp;Geertruida H. de Bock ,&nbsp;Ed Schuuring ,&nbsp;G. Bea A. Wisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Since 2017, a self-sampling device has been introduced to the Dutch population-based screening program to enable higher participation rates. However, routine triage cytology cannot be performed on self-sampling material. Methylation is an alternative triage method that can be performed directly on DNA extracted from self-samples. Recently, we tested a set of 15 published cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+)-specific methylation markers and found a panel of 3 markers with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 74%. In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of 2 commercial assays using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. DNA from the same cohort of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive self-sampled material obtained through the population-based screening program in the North of the Netherlands from women with CIN2 or less (&lt;CIN3, n = 208) and women with CIN3+ (n = 96) was used. The QIAsure methylation test (consisting of 2 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 72%, whereas the Gyntect assay (consisting of 6 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 91% for CIN3+. When we compared all individual 23 methylation markers, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of ≥0.7 for 11 of 23 markers (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). By model-based recursive partitioning and robustness analysis, we found a panel with a better sensitivity compared with QIAsure and Gyntect (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). This new panel, consisting of <em>ITGA4</em>, <em>ASCL1</em>, and <em>FAM19A4,</em> has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 70%, similar to our previously identified panel (<em>ANKRD18CP</em>, <em>LHX8</em>, and <em>EPB41L3</em>). Thus, in addition to our previously identified panel, the combination of <em>ITGA4</em>, <em>ASCL1</em>, and <em>FAM19A4</em> showed good diagnostic performance and potentially can replace cytology, thereby avoiding additional doctor visits for many women worldwide and reducing the time for decision making for referral to the gynecologist.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Pathology\",\"volume\":\"37 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 100528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089339522400108X/pdfft?md5=7f039bde8c816265f35e7c8861ad19d9&pid=1-s2.0-S089339522400108X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089339522400108X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089339522400108X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2017 年起,荷兰基于人群的筛查计划(PBS)引入了自采样装置,以提高参与率。然而,常规分流细胞学检查无法在自采样材料上进行。甲基化是一种替代分流方法,可直接在自取样本中提取的 DNA 上进行。最近,我们测试了一组 15 个已发表的宫颈上皮内瘤变 3 级或更差(CIN3+)特异性甲基化标记物,发现其中三个标记物的灵敏度为 82%,特异性为 74%。在本研究中,我们使用定量甲基化特异性 PCR(QMSP)测定了两种商业检测方法的灵敏度和特异性。从荷兰北部 CIN2 或 CIN2 以下妇女通过 PBS 采集的高危人乳头状瘤病毒(hrHPV)阳性自采样材料中提取的 DNA (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methylation Analysis to Detect CIN3+ in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive Self-Samples From the Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Program

Since 2017, a self-sampling device has been introduced to the Dutch population-based screening program to enable higher participation rates. However, routine triage cytology cannot be performed on self-sampling material. Methylation is an alternative triage method that can be performed directly on DNA extracted from self-samples. Recently, we tested a set of 15 published cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+)-specific methylation markers and found a panel of 3 markers with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 74%. In this study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of 2 commercial assays using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. DNA from the same cohort of high-risk human papillomavirus-positive self-sampled material obtained through the population-based screening program in the North of the Netherlands from women with CIN2 or less (<CIN3, n = 208) and women with CIN3+ (n = 96) was used. The QIAsure methylation test (consisting of 2 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 72%, whereas the Gyntect assay (consisting of 6 methylation markers) showed a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 91% for CIN3+. When we compared all individual 23 methylation markers, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of ≥0.7 for 11 of 23 markers (P < .001). By model-based recursive partitioning and robustness analysis, we found a panel with a better sensitivity compared with QIAsure and Gyntect (P < .001). This new panel, consisting of ITGA4, ASCL1, and FAM19A4, has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 70%, similar to our previously identified panel (ANKRD18CP, LHX8, and EPB41L3). Thus, in addition to our previously identified panel, the combination of ITGA4, ASCL1, and FAM19A4 showed good diagnostic performance and potentially can replace cytology, thereby avoiding additional doctor visits for many women worldwide and reducing the time for decision making for referral to the gynecologist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信