蓝带委员会 II 关于美国外科教育和培训的报告和建议:2024.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360
Steven C Stain, E Christopher Ellison, Diana L Farmer, Timothy C Flynn, Julie A Freischlag, Jeffrey B Matthews, Rachel W Newman, Xiaodong Chen, Dimitrios Stefanidis, L D Britt, Jo Buyske, Karen Fisher, Ajit K Sachdeva, Patricia L Turner
{"title":"蓝带委员会 II 关于美国外科教育和培训的报告和建议:2024.","authors":"Steven C Stain, E Christopher Ellison, Diana L Farmer, Timothy C Flynn, Julie A Freischlag, Jeffrey B Matthews, Rachel W Newman, Xiaodong Chen, Dimitrios Stefanidis, L D Britt, Jo Buyske, Karen Fisher, Ajit K Sachdeva, Patricia L Turner","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as ≥80% agreement among the panel. Cronbach α was computed to assess the internal consistency of 3 Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# of consensus recommendation/# of proposed): Workforce (1/5); Medical Student Education (3/8); Work Life Integration (4/6); Resident Education (5/7); Goals, Structure, and Financing of Training (5/8); Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6); Research Training (7/9); and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor, and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Steven C Stain, E Christopher Ellison, Diana L Farmer, Timothy C Flynn, Julie A Freischlag, Jeffrey B Matthews, Rachel W Newman, Xiaodong Chen, Dimitrios Stefanidis, L D Britt, Jo Buyske, Karen Fisher, Ajit K Sachdeva, Patricia L Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as ≥80% agreement among the panel. Cronbach α was computed to assess the internal consistency of 3 Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# of consensus recommendation/# of proposed): Workforce (1/5); Medical Student Education (3/8); Work Life Integration (4/6); Resident Education (5/7); Goals, Structure, and Financing of Training (5/8); Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6); Research Training (7/9); and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor, and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一个专家小组根据当代挑战的影响提出了优化外科教育和培训的建议:一个专家小组根据当代挑战的影响提出了优化外科教育和培训的建议:首届蓝丝带委员会(BRC I)于 2004 年对外科教育和培训提出了全面的建议。鉴于这些研究结果,第二届蓝丝带委员会(BRC II)召开会议,考虑到当前医学教育的现状,提出优化外科培训的建议:BRC II 是一个由 67 名专家组成的小组,这些专家都是根据他们在外科教育和培训方面的经验和领导能力挑选出来的。委员会下设若干小组委员会,在一年的时间里通过虚拟方式召开会议。他们与指导委员会一起根据重点领域提出建议,然后提交给整个 BRC II。为了达成共识,我们选择了德尔菲法,即小组成员之间达成 80% 以上的一致意见。计算了 Cronbach alpha,以评估三轮德尔菲法的内部一致性:在 50 项建议中,有 31 项在外科培训的以下方面达成了共识(# 项共识建议/# 项提议):劳动力 (1/5)、医学生教育 (3/8)、工作生活一体化 (4/6)、住院医师教育 (5/7)、培训目标、结构和经费 (5/8)、教育支持和师资发展 (5/6)、研究培训 (7/9) 以及教育技术和评估 (1/1)。第一轮和第二轮的内部一致性良好,第三轮的内部一致性可以接受:BRC II 采用德尔菲法确定并推荐了 2024 年外科教育的 31 个优先事项。我们建议成立一个多学科外科教育小组,以监督、监测和促进这些建议的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024.

Objective: An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges.

Background: The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education.

Methods: BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as ≥80% agreement among the panel. Cronbach α was computed to assess the internal consistency of 3 Delphi rounds.

Results: Of the 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# of consensus recommendation/# of proposed): Workforce (1/5); Medical Student Education (3/8); Work Life Integration (4/6); Resident Education (5/7); Goals, Structure, and Financing of Training (5/8); Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6); Research Training (7/9); and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3.

Conclusions: BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor, and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信