成对比较法中决策操纵的检测

Michał Strada, Sebastian Ernst, Jacek Szybowski, Konrad Kułakowski
{"title":"成对比较法中决策操纵的检测","authors":"Michał Strada, Sebastian Ernst, Jacek Szybowski, Konrad Kułakowski","doi":"arxiv-2405.16693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most decision-making models, including the pairwise comparison method, assume\nthe decision-makers honesty. However, it is easy to imagine a situation where a\ndecision-maker tries to manipulate the ranking results. This paper presents\nthree simple manipulation methods in the pairwise comparison method. We then\ntry to detect these methods using appropriately constructed neural networks.\nExperimental results accompany the proposed solutions on the generated data,\nshowing a considerable manipulation detection level.","PeriodicalId":501216,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Discrete Mathematics","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of decision-making manipulation in the pairwise comparisons method\",\"authors\":\"Michał Strada, Sebastian Ernst, Jacek Szybowski, Konrad Kułakowski\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.16693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most decision-making models, including the pairwise comparison method, assume\\nthe decision-makers honesty. However, it is easy to imagine a situation where a\\ndecision-maker tries to manipulate the ranking results. This paper presents\\nthree simple manipulation methods in the pairwise comparison method. We then\\ntry to detect these methods using appropriately constructed neural networks.\\nExperimental results accompany the proposed solutions on the generated data,\\nshowing a considerable manipulation detection level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Discrete Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Discrete Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.16693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Discrete Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.16693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数决策模型,包括成对比较法,都假定决策者是诚实的。然而,很容易想象出决策者试图操纵排序结果的情况。本文介绍了成对比较法中三种简单的操纵方法。实验结果表明,所提出的解决方案在生成的数据上显示出了相当高的操纵检测水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of decision-making manipulation in the pairwise comparisons method
Most decision-making models, including the pairwise comparison method, assume the decision-makers honesty. However, it is easy to imagine a situation where a decision-maker tries to manipulate the ranking results. This paper presents three simple manipulation methods in the pairwise comparison method. We then try to detect these methods using appropriately constructed neural networks. Experimental results accompany the proposed solutions on the generated data, showing a considerable manipulation detection level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信