Mohamed Sayed Abd El-Monsif, Noha Arafa, Mahmoud Marei Marei, Gamal Eltagy, Ahmed M. K. Wishahy
{"title":"腹腔镜检查与超声波检查在评估性别分化障碍男性患者残余穆勒氏管方面的比较","authors":"Mohamed Sayed Abd El-Monsif, Noha Arafa, Mahmoud Marei Marei, Gamal Eltagy, Ahmed M. K. Wishahy","doi":"10.1186/s43054-024-00256-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diagnosis of male differences of sex development is a challenging multidisciplinary team task, that requires external genital evaluation, karyotyping, hormonal profiling, radiological work up and frequently diagnostic laparoscopy and biopsy, for evaluation of internal duct system and nature of gonads. The debate still persists regarding the best diagnostic modality for accurate visualization of Müllerian duct remnants (MDRs) in those patients. The aim of the study was to compare between laparoscopy (L) and ultrasonography (US) regarding the diagnostic accuracy in detection of Müllerian duct remnants, in addition to describing their anatomical nature and relations with the male duct system, in patients with male DSD, with various karyotypes. We prospectively included 20 patients with male DSD, mostly due to 46 XY DSD or chromosomal DSD, over 2 years. The medical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. The age at the first diagnostic intervention ranged from 8 to 24 months (mean: 17 months). There were 14 patients with 46XY DSD with variable diagnoses (3 ovotesticular DSD, 3 partial gonadal dysgenesis, 6 persistent Müllerian duct remnants syndrome and 2 mixed gonadal dysgenesis). Two patients with 46XX DSD were included (one XX male, and one patient with ovotesticular DSD). One patient with chimerism (46XY/46XX) and three patients with 46XY/45XO mixed gonadal dysgenesis were also recruited. MDRs were evident in all cases (100%) by laparoscopy, only 25% (n = 5) were visualized by US. There was a statistically significant difference between laparoscopy and US regarding gonadal and MDR visualization, being higher with laparoscopy (p values, 0.0180 and 0.001). Ultrasonography failed to visualize Müllerian remnants in 75% of patients with complex DSD. On the other hand, laparoscopy provided optimum visualization of MDRs and gonads in those children.","PeriodicalId":43064,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopy versus ultrasonography for the evaluation of Müllerian duct remnants in male patients with disorder of sex differentiation\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Sayed Abd El-Monsif, Noha Arafa, Mahmoud Marei Marei, Gamal Eltagy, Ahmed M. K. Wishahy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43054-024-00256-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The diagnosis of male differences of sex development is a challenging multidisciplinary team task, that requires external genital evaluation, karyotyping, hormonal profiling, radiological work up and frequently diagnostic laparoscopy and biopsy, for evaluation of internal duct system and nature of gonads. The debate still persists regarding the best diagnostic modality for accurate visualization of Müllerian duct remnants (MDRs) in those patients. The aim of the study was to compare between laparoscopy (L) and ultrasonography (US) regarding the diagnostic accuracy in detection of Müllerian duct remnants, in addition to describing their anatomical nature and relations with the male duct system, in patients with male DSD, with various karyotypes. We prospectively included 20 patients with male DSD, mostly due to 46 XY DSD or chromosomal DSD, over 2 years. The medical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. The age at the first diagnostic intervention ranged from 8 to 24 months (mean: 17 months). There were 14 patients with 46XY DSD with variable diagnoses (3 ovotesticular DSD, 3 partial gonadal dysgenesis, 6 persistent Müllerian duct remnants syndrome and 2 mixed gonadal dysgenesis). Two patients with 46XX DSD were included (one XX male, and one patient with ovotesticular DSD). One patient with chimerism (46XY/46XX) and three patients with 46XY/45XO mixed gonadal dysgenesis were also recruited. MDRs were evident in all cases (100%) by laparoscopy, only 25% (n = 5) were visualized by US. There was a statistically significant difference between laparoscopy and US regarding gonadal and MDR visualization, being higher with laparoscopy (p values, 0.0180 and 0.001). Ultrasonography failed to visualize Müllerian remnants in 75% of patients with complex DSD. On the other hand, laparoscopy provided optimum visualization of MDRs and gonads in those children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-024-00256-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43054-024-00256-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopy versus ultrasonography for the evaluation of Müllerian duct remnants in male patients with disorder of sex differentiation
The diagnosis of male differences of sex development is a challenging multidisciplinary team task, that requires external genital evaluation, karyotyping, hormonal profiling, radiological work up and frequently diagnostic laparoscopy and biopsy, for evaluation of internal duct system and nature of gonads. The debate still persists regarding the best diagnostic modality for accurate visualization of Müllerian duct remnants (MDRs) in those patients. The aim of the study was to compare between laparoscopy (L) and ultrasonography (US) regarding the diagnostic accuracy in detection of Müllerian duct remnants, in addition to describing their anatomical nature and relations with the male duct system, in patients with male DSD, with various karyotypes. We prospectively included 20 patients with male DSD, mostly due to 46 XY DSD or chromosomal DSD, over 2 years. The medical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. The age at the first diagnostic intervention ranged from 8 to 24 months (mean: 17 months). There were 14 patients with 46XY DSD with variable diagnoses (3 ovotesticular DSD, 3 partial gonadal dysgenesis, 6 persistent Müllerian duct remnants syndrome and 2 mixed gonadal dysgenesis). Two patients with 46XX DSD were included (one XX male, and one patient with ovotesticular DSD). One patient with chimerism (46XY/46XX) and three patients with 46XY/45XO mixed gonadal dysgenesis were also recruited. MDRs were evident in all cases (100%) by laparoscopy, only 25% (n = 5) were visualized by US. There was a statistically significant difference between laparoscopy and US regarding gonadal and MDR visualization, being higher with laparoscopy (p values, 0.0180 and 0.001). Ultrasonography failed to visualize Müllerian remnants in 75% of patients with complex DSD. On the other hand, laparoscopy provided optimum visualization of MDRs and gonads in those children.
期刊介绍:
The Gazette is the official journal of the Egyptian Pediatric Association. The main purpose of the Gazette is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in both pediatrics and pediatric surgery in clinical and experimental settings. An equally important purpose of the Gazette is to publish local and regional issues related to children and child care. The Gazette welcomes original papers, review articles, case reports and short communications as well as short technical reports. Papers submitted to the Gazette are peer-reviewed by a large review board. The Gazette also offers CME quizzes, credits for which can be claimed from either the EPA website or the EPA headquarters. Fields of interest: all aspects of pediatrics, pediatric surgery, child health and child care. The Gazette complies with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).