通过数据驱动的机器学习模型预测钢筋混凝土构件的抗扭能力

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Shenggang Chen, Congcong Chen, Shengyuan Li, Junying Guo, Quanquan Guo, Chaolai Li
{"title":"通过数据驱动的机器学习模型预测钢筋混凝土构件的抗扭能力","authors":"Shenggang Chen, Congcong Chen, Shengyuan Li, Junying Guo, Quanquan Guo, Chaolai Li","doi":"10.1007/s11709-024-1050-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to the complicated three-dimensional behaviors and testing limitations of reinforced concrete (RC) members in torsion, torsional mechanism exploration and torsional performance prediction have always been difficult. In the present paper, several machine learning models were applied to predict the torsional capacity of RC members. Experimental results of a total of 287 torsional specimens were collected through an overall literature review. Algorithms of extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBM), random forest regression, back propagation artificial neural network and support vector machine, were trained and tested by 10-fold cross-validation method. Predictive performances of proposed machine learning models were evaluated and compared, both with each other and with the calculated results of existing design codes, i.e., GB 50010, ACI 318-19, and Eurocode 2. The results demonstrated that better predictive performance was achieved by machine learning models, whereas GB 50010 slightly overestimated the torsional capacity, and ACI 318-19 and Eurocode 2 underestimated it, especially in the case of ACI 318-19. The XGBM model gave the most favorable predictions with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.999, <i>RMSE</i> = 1.386, <i>MAE</i> = 0.86, and <span>\\(\\bar{\\lambda}=0.976\\)</span>. Moreover, strength of concrete was the most sensitive input parameters affecting the reliability of the predictive model, followed by transverse-to-longitudinal reinforcement ratio and total reinforcement ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":12476,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting torsional capacity of reinforced concrete members by data-driven machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Shenggang Chen, Congcong Chen, Shengyuan Li, Junying Guo, Quanquan Guo, Chaolai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11709-024-1050-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Due to the complicated three-dimensional behaviors and testing limitations of reinforced concrete (RC) members in torsion, torsional mechanism exploration and torsional performance prediction have always been difficult. In the present paper, several machine learning models were applied to predict the torsional capacity of RC members. Experimental results of a total of 287 torsional specimens were collected through an overall literature review. Algorithms of extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBM), random forest regression, back propagation artificial neural network and support vector machine, were trained and tested by 10-fold cross-validation method. Predictive performances of proposed machine learning models were evaluated and compared, both with each other and with the calculated results of existing design codes, i.e., GB 50010, ACI 318-19, and Eurocode 2. The results demonstrated that better predictive performance was achieved by machine learning models, whereas GB 50010 slightly overestimated the torsional capacity, and ACI 318-19 and Eurocode 2 underestimated it, especially in the case of ACI 318-19. The XGBM model gave the most favorable predictions with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.999, <i>RMSE</i> = 1.386, <i>MAE</i> = 0.86, and <span>\\\\(\\\\bar{\\\\lambda}=0.976\\\\)</span>. Moreover, strength of concrete was the most sensitive input parameters affecting the reliability of the predictive model, followed by transverse-to-longitudinal reinforcement ratio and total reinforcement ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1050-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1050-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于钢筋混凝土(RC)构件在扭转过程中复杂的三维行为和测试限制,扭转机理探索和扭转性能预测一直是个难题。本文应用了多个机器学习模型来预测 RC 构件的抗扭能力。通过全面查阅文献,共收集了 287 个扭转试件的实验结果。采用 10 倍交叉验证法对极梯度提升机(XGBM)、随机森林回归、反向传播人工神经网络和支持向量机等算法进行了训练和测试。对所提出的机器学习模型的预测性能进行了评估和比较,既相互比较,又与现有设计规范(即 GB 50010、ACI 318-19 和 Eurocode 2)的计算结果进行比较。结果表明,机器学习模型实现了更好的预测性能,而 GB 50010 则略微高估了抗扭能力,ACI 318-19 和 Eurocode 2 则低估了抗扭能力,尤其是 ACI 318-19。XGBM 模型的预测结果最理想,R2 = 0.999,RMSE = 1.386,MAE = 0.86,(\bar{/lambda}=0.976\)。此外,混凝土强度是影响预测模型可靠性的最敏感输入参数,其次是横向纵向配筋率和总配筋率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting torsional capacity of reinforced concrete members by data-driven machine learning models

Due to the complicated three-dimensional behaviors and testing limitations of reinforced concrete (RC) members in torsion, torsional mechanism exploration and torsional performance prediction have always been difficult. In the present paper, several machine learning models were applied to predict the torsional capacity of RC members. Experimental results of a total of 287 torsional specimens were collected through an overall literature review. Algorithms of extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBM), random forest regression, back propagation artificial neural network and support vector machine, were trained and tested by 10-fold cross-validation method. Predictive performances of proposed machine learning models were evaluated and compared, both with each other and with the calculated results of existing design codes, i.e., GB 50010, ACI 318-19, and Eurocode 2. The results demonstrated that better predictive performance was achieved by machine learning models, whereas GB 50010 slightly overestimated the torsional capacity, and ACI 318-19 and Eurocode 2 underestimated it, especially in the case of ACI 318-19. The XGBM model gave the most favorable predictions with R2 = 0.999, RMSE = 1.386, MAE = 0.86, and \(\bar{\lambda}=0.976\). Moreover, strength of concrete was the most sensitive input parameters affecting the reliability of the predictive model, followed by transverse-to-longitudinal reinforcement ratio and total reinforcement ratio.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
734
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering is an international journal that publishes original research papers, review articles and case studies related to civil and structural engineering. Topics include but are not limited to the latest developments in building and bridge structures, geotechnical engineering, hydraulic engineering, coastal engineering, and transport engineering. Case studies that demonstrate the successful applications of cutting-edge research technologies are welcome. The journal also promotes and publishes interdisciplinary research and applications connecting civil engineering and other disciplines, such as bio-, info-, nano- and social sciences and technology. Manuscripts submitted for publication will be subject to a stringent peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信