2021 年 7 月比利时极端事件期间模拟雨强和动能对气溶胶和暖雨微物理的敏感性

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
K. Van Weverberg, N. Ghilain, E. Goudenhoofdt, M. Barbier, E. Koistinen, S. Doutreloup, B. Van Schaeybroeck, A. Frankl, P. Field
{"title":"2021 年 7 月比利时极端事件期间模拟雨强和动能对气溶胶和暖雨微物理的敏感性","authors":"K. Van Weverberg, N. Ghilain, E. Goudenhoofdt, M. Barbier, E. Koistinen, S. Doutreloup, B. Van Schaeybroeck, A. Frankl, P. Field","doi":"10.1002/qj.4761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an evaluation and sensitivity analysis of km‐scale simulations of an unprecedented extreme rainfall event over Europe, with a specific focus on sub‐hourly extremes, size distributions, and kinetic energy (KE) of rain. These variables are critical for hydrological applications, such as flood forecasting or soil‐loss monitoring, but are rarely directly obtained from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. The simulations presented here reproduce the overall characteristics of the event, but overestimate the extreme rain rates. The rain rate–KE relation was well‐captured, despite too large volume‐mean drop diameters. Amongst the sensitivities investigated, the representation of the raindrop self‐collection–breakup equilibrium and the raindrop size‐distribution shape were found to have the most profound impact on the rainfall characteristics. While extreme rain rates varied within 30%, the rain KE varied by a factor of four between the realistic perturbations to the microphysical assumptions. Changes to the aerosol concentration and rain terminal velocity relations were found to have a relatively smaller impact. Given the large uncertainties, a continued effort to improve the model physics will be indispensable to estimate rain intensities and KE reliably for direct hydrological applications.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of simulated rain intensity and kinetic energy to aerosols and warm‐rain microphysics during the extreme event of July 2021 in Belgium\",\"authors\":\"K. Van Weverberg, N. Ghilain, E. Goudenhoofdt, M. Barbier, E. Koistinen, S. Doutreloup, B. Van Schaeybroeck, A. Frankl, P. Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an evaluation and sensitivity analysis of km‐scale simulations of an unprecedented extreme rainfall event over Europe, with a specific focus on sub‐hourly extremes, size distributions, and kinetic energy (KE) of rain. These variables are critical for hydrological applications, such as flood forecasting or soil‐loss monitoring, but are rarely directly obtained from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. The simulations presented here reproduce the overall characteristics of the event, but overestimate the extreme rain rates. The rain rate–KE relation was well‐captured, despite too large volume‐mean drop diameters. Amongst the sensitivities investigated, the representation of the raindrop self‐collection–breakup equilibrium and the raindrop size‐distribution shape were found to have the most profound impact on the rainfall characteristics. While extreme rain rates varied within 30%, the rain KE varied by a factor of four between the realistic perturbations to the microphysical assumptions. Changes to the aerosol concentration and rain terminal velocity relations were found to have a relatively smaller impact. Given the large uncertainties, a continued effort to improve the model physics will be indispensable to estimate rain intensities and KE reliably for direct hydrological applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4761\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4761","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对欧洲上空前所未有的极端降雨事件的千米尺度模拟进行了评估和敏感性分析,重点关注每小时以下的极端降雨量、雨量大小分布和雨的动能(KE)。这些变量对水文应用(如洪水预报或土壤流失监测)至关重要,但很少能从数值天气预报(NWP)模式中直接获取。本文介绍的模拟再现了事件的总体特征,但高估了极端降雨率。尽管雨滴的体积-平均直径过大,但仍很好地捕捉到了雨率-KE 关系。在所研究的敏感性中,发现雨滴自收集-破裂平衡的表示方法和雨滴大小-分布形状对降雨特征的影响最大。虽然极端降雨率的变化在 30% 以内,但降雨 KE 在微观物理假设的实际扰动之间相差四倍。气溶胶浓度和降雨末端速度关系的变化产生的影响相对较小。鉴于存在很大的不确定性,要可靠地估算出直接用于水文应用的降雨强度和 KE 值,就必须继续努力改进模型物理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitivity of simulated rain intensity and kinetic energy to aerosols and warm‐rain microphysics during the extreme event of July 2021 in Belgium
This article presents an evaluation and sensitivity analysis of km‐scale simulations of an unprecedented extreme rainfall event over Europe, with a specific focus on sub‐hourly extremes, size distributions, and kinetic energy (KE) of rain. These variables are critical for hydrological applications, such as flood forecasting or soil‐loss monitoring, but are rarely directly obtained from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. The simulations presented here reproduce the overall characteristics of the event, but overestimate the extreme rain rates. The rain rate–KE relation was well‐captured, despite too large volume‐mean drop diameters. Amongst the sensitivities investigated, the representation of the raindrop self‐collection–breakup equilibrium and the raindrop size‐distribution shape were found to have the most profound impact on the rainfall characteristics. While extreme rain rates varied within 30%, the rain KE varied by a factor of four between the realistic perturbations to the microphysical assumptions. Changes to the aerosol concentration and rain terminal velocity relations were found to have a relatively smaller impact. Given the large uncertainties, a continued effort to improve the model physics will be indispensable to estimate rain intensities and KE reliably for direct hydrological applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信