什么是轻度认知障碍的可靠血浆生物标志物?临床 4D 蛋白质组学研究与验证

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Zhitao Hou, Ailin Sun, Yan Li, Xiaochen Song, Shu Liu, Xinying Hu, Yihan Luan, Huibo Guan, Changyuan He, Yuefeng Sun, Jing Chen
{"title":"什么是轻度认知障碍的可靠血浆生物标志物?临床 4D 蛋白质组学研究与验证","authors":"Zhitao Hou, Ailin Sun, Yan Li, Xiaochen Song, Shu Liu, Xinying Hu, Yihan Luan, Huibo Guan, Changyuan He, Yuefeng Sun, Jing Chen","doi":"10.1155/2024/7709277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Objective</i>. At present, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) lacks effective treatment means, and early diagnosis and intervention are the keys to treatment. Therefore, for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients, blood sample analysis using the 4D nonstandard (label-free) proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis, looking for specific protein marker expression differences, is important. These marker levels change as AD progresses, and the analysis of these biomarkers changes with this method, which has the potential to show the degree of disease progression and can be used for the diagnosis and preventive treatment of MCI and AD. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Patients were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into three groups according to scale scores. Elderly patients diagnosed with AD were selected as the AD group (<i>n</i> = 9). Patients diagnosed with MCI were classified into the MCI group (<i>n</i> = 10). Cognitively healthy elderly patients were included in the normal cognition control group (<i>n</i> = 10). Patients’ blood samples were used for 4D label-free proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis to identify potential blood biomarkers. The sample size of each group was expanded (<i>n</i> = 30), and the selected biomarkers were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to verify the accuracy of the proteomic prediction. <i>Results</i>. Six specific blood markers, namely, APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8, were detected by 4D label-free proteomic quantitative analysis. These markers showed a statistically significant upregulation trend in the MCI and AD groups compared with the normal cognition control group (<span><svg height=\"9.2729pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 9.2729\" width=\"19.289pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\"></path></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"9.2729pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"22.8711838 -8.6359 21.918 9.2729\" width=\"21.918pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\"></path></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-49\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> ELISA results showed that the levels of these six proteins in the MCI group were significantly higher than those in the normal cognition control group, and the levels of these six proteins in the AD group were significantly higher than those in the MCI group (<span><svg height=\"9.2729pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 9.2729\" width=\"19.289pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-81\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g117-91\"></use></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\"9.2729pt\" style=\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\" version=\"1.1\" viewbox=\"22.8711838 -8.6359 21.918 9.2729\" width=\"21.918pt\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-49\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-47\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-49\"></use></g><g transform=\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\"><use xlink:href=\"#g113-54\"></use></g></svg>).</span></span> <i>Conclusion</i>. The plasma levels of APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8 in cognitively healthy elderly patients and patients with MCI and AD were significantly different and, more importantly, showed a trend of increasing expression. These results indicate that these six human plasma markers have important diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the identification of cognitive impairment and have value for in-depth research and clinical application.","PeriodicalId":18371,"journal":{"name":"Mediators of Inflammation","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Are the Reliable Plasma Biomarkers for Mild Cognitive Impairment? A Clinical 4D Proteomics Study and Validation\",\"authors\":\"Zhitao Hou, Ailin Sun, Yan Li, Xiaochen Song, Shu Liu, Xinying Hu, Yihan Luan, Huibo Guan, Changyuan He, Yuefeng Sun, Jing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7709277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<i>Objective</i>. At present, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) lacks effective treatment means, and early diagnosis and intervention are the keys to treatment. Therefore, for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients, blood sample analysis using the 4D nonstandard (label-free) proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis, looking for specific protein marker expression differences, is important. These marker levels change as AD progresses, and the analysis of these biomarkers changes with this method, which has the potential to show the degree of disease progression and can be used for the diagnosis and preventive treatment of MCI and AD. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Patients were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into three groups according to scale scores. Elderly patients diagnosed with AD were selected as the AD group (<i>n</i> = 9). Patients diagnosed with MCI were classified into the MCI group (<i>n</i> = 10). Cognitively healthy elderly patients were included in the normal cognition control group (<i>n</i> = 10). Patients’ blood samples were used for 4D label-free proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis to identify potential blood biomarkers. The sample size of each group was expanded (<i>n</i> = 30), and the selected biomarkers were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to verify the accuracy of the proteomic prediction. <i>Results</i>. Six specific blood markers, namely, APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8, were detected by 4D label-free proteomic quantitative analysis. These markers showed a statistically significant upregulation trend in the MCI and AD groups compared with the normal cognition control group (<span><svg height=\\\"9.2729pt\\\" style=\\\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\\\" version=\\\"1.1\\\" viewbox=\\\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 9.2729\\\" width=\\\"19.289pt\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\\\"></path></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\\\"></path></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\\\"9.2729pt\\\" style=\\\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\\\" version=\\\"1.1\\\" viewbox=\\\"22.8711838 -8.6359 21.918 9.2729\\\" width=\\\"21.918pt\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\\\"></path></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\\\"></path></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-49\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\\\"></path></g></svg>).</span></span> ELISA results showed that the levels of these six proteins in the MCI group were significantly higher than those in the normal cognition control group, and the levels of these six proteins in the AD group were significantly higher than those in the MCI group (<span><svg height=\\\"9.2729pt\\\" style=\\\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\\\" version=\\\"1.1\\\" viewbox=\\\"-0.0498162 -8.6359 19.289 9.2729\\\" width=\\\"19.289pt\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-81\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,11.658,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g117-91\\\"></use></g></svg><span></span><span><svg height=\\\"9.2729pt\\\" style=\\\"vertical-align:-0.6370001pt\\\" version=\\\"1.1\\\" viewbox=\\\"22.8711838 -8.6359 21.918 9.2729\\\" width=\\\"21.918pt\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\\\" xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\"><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,22.921,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-49\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,29.161,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-47\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,32.125,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-49\\\"></use></g><g transform=\\\"matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,38.365,0)\\\"><use xlink:href=\\\"#g113-54\\\"></use></g></svg>).</span></span> <i>Conclusion</i>. The plasma levels of APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8 in cognitively healthy elderly patients and patients with MCI and AD were significantly different and, more importantly, showed a trend of increasing expression. These results indicate that these six human plasma markers have important diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the identification of cognitive impairment and have value for in-depth research and clinical application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediators of Inflammation\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediators of Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7709277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediators of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7709277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。目前,阿尔茨海默病(AD)缺乏有效的治疗手段,早期诊断和干预是治疗的关键。因此,对于轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔兹海默病(AD)患者,采用四维非标准(无标记)蛋白质组深度定量分析方法进行血液样本分析,寻找特定蛋白质标记物的表达差异非常重要。这些标记物的水平会随着 AD 的进展而发生变化,用这种方法分析这些生物标记物的变化,有可能显示疾病的进展程度,可用于 MCI 和 AD 的诊断和预防治疗。材料与方法。根据纳入和排除标准招募患者,按量表评分分为三组。老年 AD 患者为 AD 组(9 人)。确诊为 MCI 的患者被分为 MCI 组(n = 10)。认知健康的老年患者被纳入正常认知对照组(10 人)。患者的血液样本用于 4D 无标记蛋白质组深度定量分析,以确定潜在的血液生物标记物。扩大每组样本量(n = 30),并通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)验证所选生物标志物,以验证蛋白质组预测的准确性。结果显示4D 无标记蛋白质组定量分析检测了六种特定的血液标记物,即 APOE、MMP9、UBR5、PLA2G7、STAT5B 和 S100A8。与正常认知对照组相比,这些标记物在MCI组和AD组中呈显著的统计学上的上调趋势()。ELISA结果显示,MCI组中这六种蛋白质的水平明显高于正常认知对照组,而AD组中这六种蛋白质的水平明显高于MCI组()。结论认知健康老年患者与 MCI 和 AD 患者血浆中 APOE、MMP9、UBR5、PLA2G7、STAT5B 和 S100A8 的水平存在明显差异,更重要的是,其表达量呈上升趋势。这些结果表明,这六种人体血浆标志物在认知障碍的鉴定方面具有重要的诊断和治疗潜力,具有深入研究和临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Are the Reliable Plasma Biomarkers for Mild Cognitive Impairment? A Clinical 4D Proteomics Study and Validation
Objective. At present, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) lacks effective treatment means, and early diagnosis and intervention are the keys to treatment. Therefore, for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients, blood sample analysis using the 4D nonstandard (label-free) proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis, looking for specific protein marker expression differences, is important. These marker levels change as AD progresses, and the analysis of these biomarkers changes with this method, which has the potential to show the degree of disease progression and can be used for the diagnosis and preventive treatment of MCI and AD. Materials and Methods. Patients were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into three groups according to scale scores. Elderly patients diagnosed with AD were selected as the AD group (n = 9). Patients diagnosed with MCI were classified into the MCI group (n = 10). Cognitively healthy elderly patients were included in the normal cognition control group (n = 10). Patients’ blood samples were used for 4D label-free proteomic in-depth quantitative analysis to identify potential blood biomarkers. The sample size of each group was expanded (n = 30), and the selected biomarkers were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to verify the accuracy of the proteomic prediction. Results. Six specific blood markers, namely, APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8, were detected by 4D label-free proteomic quantitative analysis. These markers showed a statistically significant upregulation trend in the MCI and AD groups compared with the normal cognition control group (). ELISA results showed that the levels of these six proteins in the MCI group were significantly higher than those in the normal cognition control group, and the levels of these six proteins in the AD group were significantly higher than those in the MCI group (). Conclusion. The plasma levels of APOE, MMP9, UBR5, PLA2G7, STAT5B, and S100A8 in cognitively healthy elderly patients and patients with MCI and AD were significantly different and, more importantly, showed a trend of increasing expression. These results indicate that these six human plasma markers have important diagnostic and therapeutic potential in the identification of cognitive impairment and have value for in-depth research and clinical application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mediators of Inflammation
Mediators of Inflammation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Mediators of Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles on all types of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, histamine, bradykinin, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, PAF, biological response modifiers and the family of cell adhesion-promoting molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信