人机交互中与信任相关的知识转移框架

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Mohammed Diab, Yiannis Demiris
{"title":"人机交互中与信任相关的知识转移框架","authors":"Mohammed Diab,&nbsp;Yiannis Demiris","doi":"10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trustworthy human–robot interaction (HRI) during activities of daily living (ADL) presents an interesting and challenging domain for assistive robots, particularly since methods for estimating the trust level of a human participant towards the assistive robot are still in their infancy. Trust is a multifaced concept which is affected by the interactions between the robot and the human, and depends, among other factors, on the history of the robot’s functionality, the task and the environmental state. In this paper, we are concerned with the challenge of trust transfer, i.e. whether experiences from interactions on a previous collaborative task can be taken into consideration in the trust level inference for a new collaborative task. This has the potential of avoiding re-computing trust levels from scratch for every new situation. The key challenge here is to automatically evaluate the similarity between the original and the novel situation, then adapt the robot’s behaviour to the novel situation using previous experience with various objects and tasks. To achieve this, we measure the semantic similarity between concepts in knowledge graphs (KGs) and adapt the robot’s actions towards a specific user based on personalised interaction histories. These actions are grounded and then verified before execution using a geometric motion planner to generate feasible trajectories in novel situations. This framework has been experimentally tested in human–robot handover tasks in different kitchen scene contexts. We conclude that trust-related knowledge positively influences and improves collaboration in both performance and time aspects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for trust-related knowledge transfer in human–robot interaction\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Diab,&nbsp;Yiannis Demiris\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Trustworthy human–robot interaction (HRI) during activities of daily living (ADL) presents an interesting and challenging domain for assistive robots, particularly since methods for estimating the trust level of a human participant towards the assistive robot are still in their infancy. Trust is a multifaced concept which is affected by the interactions between the robot and the human, and depends, among other factors, on the history of the robot’s functionality, the task and the environmental state. In this paper, we are concerned with the challenge of trust transfer, i.e. whether experiences from interactions on a previous collaborative task can be taken into consideration in the trust level inference for a new collaborative task. This has the potential of avoiding re-computing trust levels from scratch for every new situation. The key challenge here is to automatically evaluate the similarity between the original and the novel situation, then adapt the robot’s behaviour to the novel situation using previous experience with various objects and tasks. To achieve this, we measure the semantic similarity between concepts in knowledge graphs (KGs) and adapt the robot’s actions towards a specific user based on personalised interaction histories. These actions are grounded and then verified before execution using a geometric motion planner to generate feasible trajectories in novel situations. This framework has been experimentally tested in human–robot handover tasks in different kitchen scene contexts. We conclude that trust-related knowledge positively influences and improves collaboration in both performance and time aspects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-024-09653-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日常生活(ADL)活动中,值得信赖的人机交互(HRI)为辅助机器人提供了一个既有趣又具有挑战性的领域,特别是因为估算人类参与者对辅助机器人的信任程度的方法仍处于起步阶段。信任是一个多层面的概念,受机器人与人类之间互动的影响,除其他因素外,还取决于机器人功能的历史、任务和环境状态。在本文中,我们关注的是 "信任转移 "这一挑战,即在推断新的协作任务的信任度时,是否可以考虑之前协作任务的交互经验。这有可能避免在每种新情况下从头开始重新计算信任度。这里的关键挑战在于自动评估原始情境与新情境之间的相似性,然后利用以前处理各种对象和任务的经验,使机器人的行为适应新情境。为此,我们测量了知识图谱(KGs)中概念之间的语义相似性,并根据个性化的交互历史记录调整机器人针对特定用户的行动。这些动作都是有依据的,然后在执行前使用几何运动规划器进行验证,以便在新情况下生成可行的轨迹。这一框架已在不同厨房场景下的人机交接任务中进行了实验测试。我们得出的结论是,与信任相关的知识在性能和时间方面都对协作产生了积极影响和改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A framework for trust-related knowledge transfer in human–robot interaction

A framework for trust-related knowledge transfer in human–robot interaction

Trustworthy human–robot interaction (HRI) during activities of daily living (ADL) presents an interesting and challenging domain for assistive robots, particularly since methods for estimating the trust level of a human participant towards the assistive robot are still in their infancy. Trust is a multifaced concept which is affected by the interactions between the robot and the human, and depends, among other factors, on the history of the robot’s functionality, the task and the environmental state. In this paper, we are concerned with the challenge of trust transfer, i.e. whether experiences from interactions on a previous collaborative task can be taken into consideration in the trust level inference for a new collaborative task. This has the potential of avoiding re-computing trust levels from scratch for every new situation. The key challenge here is to automatically evaluate the similarity between the original and the novel situation, then adapt the robot’s behaviour to the novel situation using previous experience with various objects and tasks. To achieve this, we measure the semantic similarity between concepts in knowledge graphs (KGs) and adapt the robot’s actions towards a specific user based on personalised interaction histories. These actions are grounded and then verified before execution using a geometric motion planner to generate feasible trajectories in novel situations. This framework has been experimentally tested in human–robot handover tasks in different kitchen scene contexts. We conclude that trust-related knowledge positively influences and improves collaboration in both performance and time aspects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to: Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent) Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning. Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems. Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness Significant, novel applications of agent technology Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信