C.H.亚历山德罗维奇的印度和考蒂扬时刻

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Carl LANDAUER
{"title":"C.H.亚历山德罗维奇的印度和考蒂扬时刻","authors":"Carl LANDAUER","doi":"10.1017/s2044251324000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the international legal historian C.H. Alexandrowicz's engagement with Kautilya's <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic> as part of his revision of the place of India and Southeast Asia in the development of international law. The article locates Alexandrowicz's writing on the <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic> against the backdrop of the debates about the <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic> that ensued upon its discovery in 1905, including controversies about its date, authorship, and place in the tradition of Indian political thought. The article reviews the Indian nationalist reading of Kautilya, the various attempts to compare Kautilya to Hobbes and Machiavelli, and the values that were particularly important for Alexandrowicz in telling the narrative of the place of Kautilya's <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic>, its rationalism, secularism, and the divisibility of sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":43342,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C.H. Alexandrowicz's India and the Kautilyan Moment\",\"authors\":\"Carl LANDAUER\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s2044251324000079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses the international legal historian C.H. Alexandrowicz's engagement with Kautilya's <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic> as part of his revision of the place of India and Southeast Asia in the development of international law. The article locates Alexandrowicz's writing on the <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic> against the backdrop of the debates about the <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic> that ensued upon its discovery in 1905, including controversies about its date, authorship, and place in the tradition of Indian political thought. The article reviews the Indian nationalist reading of Kautilya, the various attempts to compare Kautilya to Hobbes and Machiavelli, and the values that were particularly important for Alexandrowicz in telling the narrative of the place of Kautilya's <jats:italic>Arthashastra</jats:italic>, its rationalism, secularism, and the divisibility of sovereignty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251324000079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251324000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了国际法律史学家 C.H. Alexandrowicz 对 Kautilya 的《Arthashastra》的研究,这是他修订印度和东南亚在国际法发展中的地位的一部分。文章将亚历山德罗维奇关于《阿塔沙斯特拉》的写作与 1905 年发现《阿塔沙斯特拉》后引发的关于该书的争论(包括关于其日期、作者和在印度政治思想传统中的地位的争论)联系起来。文章回顾了印度民族主义对考提利雅的解读、将考提利雅与霍布斯和马基雅维利进行比较的各种尝试,以及亚历山德罗维奇在讲述考提利雅的《阿塔沙斯特拉》的地位、其理性主义、世俗主义和主权可分性时特别重视的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
C.H. Alexandrowicz's India and the Kautilyan Moment
This article addresses the international legal historian C.H. Alexandrowicz's engagement with Kautilya's Arthashastra as part of his revision of the place of India and Southeast Asia in the development of international law. The article locates Alexandrowicz's writing on the Arthashastra against the backdrop of the debates about the Arthashastra that ensued upon its discovery in 1905, including controversies about its date, authorship, and place in the tradition of Indian political thought. The article reviews the Indian nationalist reading of Kautilya, the various attempts to compare Kautilya to Hobbes and Machiavelli, and the values that were particularly important for Alexandrowicz in telling the narrative of the place of Kautilya's Arthashastra, its rationalism, secularism, and the divisibility of sovereignty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信