以不同速度通过鱼道入口--小型非鲑鱼水槽实验结果

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cornelia Schütz, Rebekka Czerny, Marcus Herbst, Martin Henning, Matthias Pitsch
{"title":"以不同速度通过鱼道入口--小型非鲑鱼水槽实验结果","authors":"Cornelia Schütz, Rebekka Czerny, Marcus Herbst, Martin Henning, Matthias Pitsch","doi":"10.1002/rra.4299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A challenge in the design of fishways especially for large rivers is the trade‐off between attraction and passability of the entrance. High flow velocities in the entrance slot generate a strong attraction flow and tend to have better attraction efficiency for upstream migration. However, these velocities may also prevent small‐bodied species or juvenile fish from entering the fishway. With our experiment, we reproduced fish swimming behaviour and passage of a fishway entrance for small‐bodied fish under realistic hydraulic conditions. At an entrance slot with 0.4 m width four velocities 0.8, 1.2, 1.5 and 1.8 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> were investigated. In total, 326 juvenile roach (<jats:italic>Rutilus rutilus</jats:italic> (Linnaeus, 1758)), gudgeons (<jats:italic>Gobio gobio</jats:italic> (Linnaeus, 1758)) and spirlins (<jats:italic>Alburnoides bipunctatus</jats:italic> (Bloch, 1782)) were tested. The passage rates of the three tested species were altogether higher than would have been predicted from reported swimming capacities. They increased from gudgeons to roach and (significantly) to spirlins and we could show how passage rates of the three species decreased with increasing flow velocities, suggesting species‐specific critical slot velocities. Still, these velocities are lower than those currently proposed to generate sufficient attraction flow, which may have implications for fishway design.","PeriodicalId":21513,"journal":{"name":"River Research and Applications","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passage through a fishway entrance at different velocities—results from flume experiments with small non‐salmonids\",\"authors\":\"Cornelia Schütz, Rebekka Czerny, Marcus Herbst, Martin Henning, Matthias Pitsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rra.4299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A challenge in the design of fishways especially for large rivers is the trade‐off between attraction and passability of the entrance. High flow velocities in the entrance slot generate a strong attraction flow and tend to have better attraction efficiency for upstream migration. However, these velocities may also prevent small‐bodied species or juvenile fish from entering the fishway. With our experiment, we reproduced fish swimming behaviour and passage of a fishway entrance for small‐bodied fish under realistic hydraulic conditions. At an entrance slot with 0.4 m width four velocities 0.8, 1.2, 1.5 and 1.8 ms<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> were investigated. In total, 326 juvenile roach (<jats:italic>Rutilus rutilus</jats:italic> (Linnaeus, 1758)), gudgeons (<jats:italic>Gobio gobio</jats:italic> (Linnaeus, 1758)) and spirlins (<jats:italic>Alburnoides bipunctatus</jats:italic> (Bloch, 1782)) were tested. The passage rates of the three tested species were altogether higher than would have been predicted from reported swimming capacities. They increased from gudgeons to roach and (significantly) to spirlins and we could show how passage rates of the three species decreased with increasing flow velocities, suggesting species‐specific critical slot velocities. Still, these velocities are lower than those currently proposed to generate sufficient attraction flow, which may have implications for fishway design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"River Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"River Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"River Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计鱼道,尤其是设计大江大河的鱼道,面临的一个挑战是如何权衡入口的吸引力和通过性。入口槽中的高流速会产生强大的吸引流,往往对上游洄游具有更好的吸引效率。然而,这些流速也可能会阻碍小体型鱼类或幼鱼进入鱼道。通过实验,我们再现了鱼类的游动行为,以及小体型鱼类在实际水力条件下通过鱼道入口的情况。在宽度为 0.4 米的入口槽中,我们研究了 0.8、1.2、1.5 和 1.8 毫秒-1 四种速度。总共测试了 326 条鳊鱼(Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758))、鰕虎鱼(Gobio gobio (Linnaeus, 1758))和麒麟鱼(Alburnoides bipunctatus (Bloch, 1782))幼鱼。三个受测物种的通过率均高于根据报告的游泳能力预测的结果。我们可以看到,三种鱼类的通过率随着流速的增加而降低,这表明鱼类的临界槽速各不相同。尽管如此,这些流速仍低于目前建议的产生足够吸引流量的流速,这可能会对鱼道设计产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Passage through a fishway entrance at different velocities—results from flume experiments with small non‐salmonids
A challenge in the design of fishways especially for large rivers is the trade‐off between attraction and passability of the entrance. High flow velocities in the entrance slot generate a strong attraction flow and tend to have better attraction efficiency for upstream migration. However, these velocities may also prevent small‐bodied species or juvenile fish from entering the fishway. With our experiment, we reproduced fish swimming behaviour and passage of a fishway entrance for small‐bodied fish under realistic hydraulic conditions. At an entrance slot with 0.4 m width four velocities 0.8, 1.2, 1.5 and 1.8 ms−1 were investigated. In total, 326 juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758)), gudgeons (Gobio gobio (Linnaeus, 1758)) and spirlins (Alburnoides bipunctatus (Bloch, 1782)) were tested. The passage rates of the three tested species were altogether higher than would have been predicted from reported swimming capacities. They increased from gudgeons to roach and (significantly) to spirlins and we could show how passage rates of the three species decreased with increasing flow velocities, suggesting species‐specific critical slot velocities. Still, these velocities are lower than those currently proposed to generate sufficient attraction flow, which may have implications for fishway design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
River Research and Applications
River Research and Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: River Research and Applications , previously published as Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (1987-2001), is an international journal dedicated to the promotion of basic and applied scientific research on rivers. The journal publishes original scientific and technical papers on biological, ecological, geomorphological, hydrological, engineering and geographical aspects related to rivers in both the developed and developing world. Papers showing how basic studies and new science can be of use in applied problems associated with river management, regulation and restoration are encouraged as is interdisciplinary research concerned directly or indirectly with river management problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信