向从业人员传达研究成果--在科学严谨性、简易科学性和从业人员对专业知识的自我认知之间的关系

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hadjar Mohajerzad, Andreas Martin, Lavinia Kamphausen, Sarah Widany
{"title":"向从业人员传达研究成果--在科学严谨性、简易科学性和从业人员对专业知识的自我认知之间的关系","authors":"Hadjar Mohajerzad, Andreas Martin, Lavinia Kamphausen, Sarah Widany","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-01-2024-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Research shows that there are mechanisms of information simplification that lead to the danger that first, laypeople rely on their own epistemological skills when assessing scientific claims. Second, laypeople underestimate their dependence on experts when they receive simplified information. This underestimation can be problematic because scientific knowledge, due to its complexity, usually cannot be fully understood without further advice from experts. Compared to laypersons, adult education practitioners can be expected to have a higher level of scientific literacy in relation to knowledge in their professional field because they are familiar with the structure of knowledge through their formal education. The present study examines whether the “easiness effect” also occurs in adult education practitioners when they read simplified and highly simplified texts about research findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> The sample consisted of 1.267 continuing education institutions. For the survey experiment, particioants were randomly assigned to tree text types at the end of the survey: easy, less scientific and scientific text. We used the difference-in-difference method to analyze the data. </p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study examined whether easily presented research findings influenced self-assessment and reliance on experts. The results of our study support the hypothesis that the easiness effect is also present among professional practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The use of clear and nontechnical language is essential for ensuring that scientific knowledge is accessible and utilizable outside of academic circles. This aspect gains particular significance in educational research, as it enables professional practitioners to comprehend and ideally implement, research findings in their daily routines to address and resolve real-world challenges in their educational environments. Previous studies have demonstrated that the way text is presented influences laypeople's perceived reliance on experts. Building upon the conceptual framework of the easiness effect, this survey experiment took an additional step by focusing specifically on a targeted audience: professional practitioners in adult education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating research to practitioners – between scientific rigor, easy science and practitioners' self-perception of expertise\",\"authors\":\"Hadjar Mohajerzad, Andreas Martin, Lavinia Kamphausen, Sarah Widany\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpcc-01-2024-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Research shows that there are mechanisms of information simplification that lead to the danger that first, laypeople rely on their own epistemological skills when assessing scientific claims. Second, laypeople underestimate their dependence on experts when they receive simplified information. This underestimation can be problematic because scientific knowledge, due to its complexity, usually cannot be fully understood without further advice from experts. Compared to laypersons, adult education practitioners can be expected to have a higher level of scientific literacy in relation to knowledge in their professional field because they are familiar with the structure of knowledge through their formal education. The present study examines whether the “easiness effect” also occurs in adult education practitioners when they read simplified and highly simplified texts about research findings.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p> The sample consisted of 1.267 continuing education institutions. For the survey experiment, particioants were randomly assigned to tree text types at the end of the survey: easy, less scientific and scientific text. We used the difference-in-difference method to analyze the data. </p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The study examined whether easily presented research findings influenced self-assessment and reliance on experts. The results of our study support the hypothesis that the easiness effect is also present among professional practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The use of clear and nontechnical language is essential for ensuring that scientific knowledge is accessible and utilizable outside of academic circles. This aspect gains particular significance in educational research, as it enables professional practitioners to comprehend and ideally implement, research findings in their daily routines to address and resolve real-world challenges in their educational environments. Previous studies have demonstrated that the way text is presented influences laypeople's perceived reliance on experts. Building upon the conceptual framework of the easiness effect, this survey experiment took an additional step by focusing specifically on a targeted audience: professional practitioners in adult education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":44790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Professional Capital and Community\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Professional Capital and Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-01-2024-0003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-01-2024-0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究表明,信息简化的机制会导致以下危险:首先,外行人在评估科学主张时会依赖自己的认识论技能。其次,外行人在接受简化信息时会低估自己对专家的依赖性。这种低估可能会产生问题,因为科学知识由于其复杂性,通常没有专家的进一步建议是无法完全理解的。与普通人相比,成人教育从业者由于接受过正规教育,熟悉知识结构,因此在其专业领域的知识方面应该具有更高的科学素养。本研究探讨了成人教育从业者在阅读有关研究成果的简化和高度简化文本时是否也会产生 "易读效应"。在调查实验中,参与者在调查结束时被随机分配到树状文本类型:简易文本、不太科学文本和科学文本。我们采用差异分析法对数据进行了分析。研究结果本研究考察了易于呈现的研究结果是否会影响自我评估和对专家的依赖。我们的研究结果支持这一假设,即在专业从业人员中也存在简易效应。原创性/价值使用清晰、非技术性的语言对于确保科学知识在学术界之外也能被获取和利用至关重要。这一点在教育研究中尤为重要,因为它能让专业从业人员在日常工作中理解并理想地实施研究成果,以应对和解决教育环境中的现实挑战。以往的研究表明,文本的呈现方式会影响非专业人士对专家的依赖程度。在 "轻松效应 "概念框架的基础上,本调查实验又迈出了新的一步,特别关注目标受众:成人教育的专业从业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communicating research to practitioners – between scientific rigor, easy science and practitioners' self-perception of expertise

Purpose

Research shows that there are mechanisms of information simplification that lead to the danger that first, laypeople rely on their own epistemological skills when assessing scientific claims. Second, laypeople underestimate their dependence on experts when they receive simplified information. This underestimation can be problematic because scientific knowledge, due to its complexity, usually cannot be fully understood without further advice from experts. Compared to laypersons, adult education practitioners can be expected to have a higher level of scientific literacy in relation to knowledge in their professional field because they are familiar with the structure of knowledge through their formal education. The present study examines whether the “easiness effect” also occurs in adult education practitioners when they read simplified and highly simplified texts about research findings.

Design/methodology/approach

The sample consisted of 1.267 continuing education institutions. For the survey experiment, particioants were randomly assigned to tree text types at the end of the survey: easy, less scientific and scientific text. We used the difference-in-difference method to analyze the data.

Findings

The study examined whether easily presented research findings influenced self-assessment and reliance on experts. The results of our study support the hypothesis that the easiness effect is also present among professional practitioners.

Originality/value

The use of clear and nontechnical language is essential for ensuring that scientific knowledge is accessible and utilizable outside of academic circles. This aspect gains particular significance in educational research, as it enables professional practitioners to comprehend and ideally implement, research findings in their daily routines to address and resolve real-world challenges in their educational environments. Previous studies have demonstrated that the way text is presented influences laypeople's perceived reliance on experts. Building upon the conceptual framework of the easiness effect, this survey experiment took an additional step by focusing specifically on a targeted audience: professional practitioners in adult education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信