无人机通信网络三种路由协议的性能评估

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Gamil Ahmed, Tarek Sheltami, Ashraf Mahmoud, Muhammad Imam
{"title":"无人机通信网络三种路由协议的性能评估","authors":"Gamil Ahmed, Tarek Sheltami, Ashraf Mahmoud, Muhammad Imam","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-08932-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With technological advancements in networking and wireless communication, the flying ad hoc network has emerged as a cost-effective relay network. Networks of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can be cooperatively organized as an ad hoc network for effectively accomplishing complex tasks. Such a UAV network is deployed as a relay network that forwards and exchanges accurate and reliable end-to-end in-formation. However, the design of routing protocols is rendered difficult by flying constraints and extreme topology changes over a short time period. The performance of the routing protocols in such networks is considerably affected by high-speed nodes and extreme topology changes. Evaluating the routing protocol in a UAV network gives insight regarding the performance of the entire network. This paper evaluates, analyzes, and compares the performances of three routing protocols: Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR), and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV). In most of the simulated cases, the AODV outperformed the OLSR and DSDV. The number of nodes, i.e., the network size, largely affected the throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and end-to-end delay (E2E) of the network. However, the OLSR improved the performance of the average E2E; therefore, it is suitable for delay-sensitive applications. However, AODV outperformed the other protocols in terms of throughput and PDR because it reacts to topology changes. DSDV delivered the poorest PDR and throughput.</p>","PeriodicalId":8109,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Three Routing Protocols for Drone Communication Networks\",\"authors\":\"Gamil Ahmed, Tarek Sheltami, Ashraf Mahmoud, Muhammad Imam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13369-024-08932-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>With technological advancements in networking and wireless communication, the flying ad hoc network has emerged as a cost-effective relay network. Networks of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can be cooperatively organized as an ad hoc network for effectively accomplishing complex tasks. Such a UAV network is deployed as a relay network that forwards and exchanges accurate and reliable end-to-end in-formation. However, the design of routing protocols is rendered difficult by flying constraints and extreme topology changes over a short time period. The performance of the routing protocols in such networks is considerably affected by high-speed nodes and extreme topology changes. Evaluating the routing protocol in a UAV network gives insight regarding the performance of the entire network. This paper evaluates, analyzes, and compares the performances of three routing protocols: Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR), and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV). In most of the simulated cases, the AODV outperformed the OLSR and DSDV. The number of nodes, i.e., the network size, largely affected the throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and end-to-end delay (E2E) of the network. However, the OLSR improved the performance of the average E2E; therefore, it is suitable for delay-sensitive applications. However, AODV outperformed the other protocols in terms of throughput and PDR because it reacts to topology changes. DSDV delivered the poorest PDR and throughput.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08932-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08932-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着网络和无线通信技术的进步,飞行临时网络已成为一种经济高效的中继网络。无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)网络可以合作组织成一个特设网络,从而有效地完成复杂的任务。这种无人飞行器网络被部署为中继网络,可转发和交换准确可靠的端到端信息。然而,由于飞行限制和短时间内拓扑结构的剧烈变化,路由协议的设计变得十分困难。高速节点和极端拓扑变化对路由协议在此类网络中的性能影响很大。对无人机网络中的路由协议进行评估可以深入了解整个网络的性能。本文对三种路由协议的性能进行了评估、分析和比较:Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV)、Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) 和 Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV)。在大多数模拟情况下,AODV 的性能都优于 OLSR 和 DSDV。节点数量(即网络规模)在很大程度上影响了网络的吞吐量、数据包传送率(PDR)和端到端延迟(E2E)。不过,OLSR 提高了平均 E2E 的性能,因此适用于对延迟敏感的应用。不过,AODV 在吞吐量和 PDR 方面优于其他协议,因为它能对拓扑变化做出反应。DSDV 的 PDR 和吞吐量最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance Evaluation of Three Routing Protocols for Drone Communication Networks

Performance Evaluation of Three Routing Protocols for Drone Communication Networks

With technological advancements in networking and wireless communication, the flying ad hoc network has emerged as a cost-effective relay network. Networks of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can be cooperatively organized as an ad hoc network for effectively accomplishing complex tasks. Such a UAV network is deployed as a relay network that forwards and exchanges accurate and reliable end-to-end in-formation. However, the design of routing protocols is rendered difficult by flying constraints and extreme topology changes over a short time period. The performance of the routing protocols in such networks is considerably affected by high-speed nodes and extreme topology changes. Evaluating the routing protocol in a UAV network gives insight regarding the performance of the entire network. This paper evaluates, analyzes, and compares the performances of three routing protocols: Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV), Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR), and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV). In most of the simulated cases, the AODV outperformed the OLSR and DSDV. The number of nodes, i.e., the network size, largely affected the throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), and end-to-end delay (E2E) of the network. However, the OLSR improved the performance of the average E2E; therefore, it is suitable for delay-sensitive applications. However, AODV outperformed the other protocols in terms of throughput and PDR because it reacts to topology changes. DSDV delivered the poorest PDR and throughput.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信