{"title":"重新赋予自由:阿甘本的 \"生命形式 \"是对福柯 \"生物权力 \"的回应","authors":"Abbas Jamali","doi":"10.1007/s11841-024-01015-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy has been influenced by Michel Foucault’s thoughts in various aspects. This influence can be seen especially in methodology and political philosophy to a certain extent. Agamben’s political project, <i>Homo Sacer</i>, culminates in the publication of <i>The Use of Bodies</i>, where he proposes ‘form-of-life’ as a way to overcome the contemporary biopolitics. While the concept of form-of-life has often been considered in connection with the issue of sovereignty and law, this article argues that it (and Agamben’s coming politics) can also be understood as a response to Foucault’s biopower. This is possible by considering several conceptual oppositions raised by Agamben against Foucault’s ideas, concepts such as “intimacy”, “community”, and “<i>zoe</i>/<i>bios</i>”. And this is, finally, an effort to re-appropriate human freedom.</p>","PeriodicalId":44736,"journal":{"name":"Sophia","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-appropriating Freedom: Agamben’s Form-of-Life as a Response to Foucault’s Biopower\",\"authors\":\"Abbas Jamali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11841-024-01015-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy has been influenced by Michel Foucault’s thoughts in various aspects. This influence can be seen especially in methodology and political philosophy to a certain extent. Agamben’s political project, <i>Homo Sacer</i>, culminates in the publication of <i>The Use of Bodies</i>, where he proposes ‘form-of-life’ as a way to overcome the contemporary biopolitics. While the concept of form-of-life has often been considered in connection with the issue of sovereignty and law, this article argues that it (and Agamben’s coming politics) can also be understood as a response to Foucault’s biopower. This is possible by considering several conceptual oppositions raised by Agamben against Foucault’s ideas, concepts such as “intimacy”, “community”, and “<i>zoe</i>/<i>bios</i>”. And this is, finally, an effort to re-appropriate human freedom.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophia\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01015-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01015-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
乔治-阿甘本的哲学在多方面受到米歇尔-福柯思想的影响。这种影响在一定程度上体现在方法论和政治哲学方面。阿甘本的政治项目 "圣人"(Homo Sacer)在《身体的使用》(The Use of Bodies)一书中达到了顶峰,他在书中提出了 "生命形式"(form-of-life)作为克服当代生物政治的方法。虽然 "生命形式 "的概念通常被认为与主权和法律问题有关,但本文认为,它(以及阿甘本的未来政治)也可以被理解为对福柯的生物权力的回应。这可以通过考虑阿甘本针对福柯思想提出的几个概念对立来实现,如 "亲密关系"、"共同体 "和 "宙/生物 "等概念。最后,这也是一种重新赋予人类自由的努力。
Re-appropriating Freedom: Agamben’s Form-of-Life as a Response to Foucault’s Biopower
Giorgio Agamben’s philosophy has been influenced by Michel Foucault’s thoughts in various aspects. This influence can be seen especially in methodology and political philosophy to a certain extent. Agamben’s political project, Homo Sacer, culminates in the publication of The Use of Bodies, where he proposes ‘form-of-life’ as a way to overcome the contemporary biopolitics. While the concept of form-of-life has often been considered in connection with the issue of sovereignty and law, this article argues that it (and Agamben’s coming politics) can also be understood as a response to Foucault’s biopower. This is possible by considering several conceptual oppositions raised by Agamben against Foucault’s ideas, concepts such as “intimacy”, “community”, and “zoe/bios”. And this is, finally, an effort to re-appropriate human freedom.
期刊介绍:
Sophia is now published by Springer. The back files, all the way to Volume 1:1, are available via SpringerLink! Covers both analytic and continental philosophy of religionConsiders both western and non-western perspectives, including Asian and indigenousIncludes specialist contributions, e.g. on feminist and postcolonial philosophy of religionSince its inception in 1962, Sophia has been devoted to providing a forum for discussions in philosophy and religion, focusing on the interstices between metaphysics and theological thinking. The discussions take cognizance of the wider ambience of the sciences (''natural'' philosophy and human/social sciences), ethical and moral concerns in the public sphere, critical feminist theology and cross-cultural perspectives. Sophia''s cross-cultural and cross-frontier approach is reflected not only in the international composition of its editorial board, but also in its consideration of analytic, continental, Asian and indigenous responses to issues and developments in the field of philosophy of religion.