注释任务设计中的社会和伦理规范

Razvan Amironesei;Mark Díaz
{"title":"注释任务设计中的社会和伦理规范","authors":"Razvan Amironesei;Mark Díaz","doi":"10.1109/TTS.2024.3374639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of many machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems depends on human-labeled data. Human-provided labels act as tags or enriching information that enable algorithms to more easily learn patterns in data in order to train or evaluate a wide range of AI systems. These annotations ultimately shape the behavior of AI systems. Given the scale of ML datasets, which can contain thousands to billions of data points, cost and efficiency play a major role in how data annotations are collected. Yet, important challenges arise between the goals of meeting scale-related needs while also collecting data in a way that reflects real-world nuance and variation. Annotators are typically treated as interchangeable workers who provide a ‘view from nowhere’. We question assumptions of universal ground truth by focusing on the social and ethical aspects that shape annotation task design.","PeriodicalId":73324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","volume":"5 1","pages":"45-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social and Ethical Norms in Annotation Task Design\",\"authors\":\"Razvan Amironesei;Mark Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TTS.2024.3374639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of many machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems depends on human-labeled data. Human-provided labels act as tags or enriching information that enable algorithms to more easily learn patterns in data in order to train or evaluate a wide range of AI systems. These annotations ultimately shape the behavior of AI systems. Given the scale of ML datasets, which can contain thousands to billions of data points, cost and efficiency play a major role in how data annotations are collected. Yet, important challenges arise between the goals of meeting scale-related needs while also collecting data in a way that reflects real-world nuance and variation. Annotators are typically treated as interchangeable workers who provide a ‘view from nowhere’. We question assumptions of universal ground truth by focusing on the social and ethical aspects that shape annotation task design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on technology and society\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"45-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on technology and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10462544/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on technology and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10462544/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)系统的开发都依赖于人类标签数据。人类提供的标签可以作为标签或丰富信息,使算法能够更轻松地学习数据中的模式,从而训练或评估各种人工智能系统。这些注释最终会影响人工智能系统的行为。鉴于人工智能数据集的规模(可能包含数千到数十亿个数据点),成本和效率在如何收集数据注释方面发挥着重要作用。然而,既要满足与规模相关的需求,又要以反映真实世界细微差别和变化的方式收集数据,这两个目标之间存在着巨大的挑战。注释者通常被视为可互换的工作人员,他们提供的是 "无处不在的视角"。我们将重点放在影响注释任务设计的社会和伦理方面,从而对普遍基本事实的假设提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social and Ethical Norms in Annotation Task Design
The development of many machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems depends on human-labeled data. Human-provided labels act as tags or enriching information that enable algorithms to more easily learn patterns in data in order to train or evaluate a wide range of AI systems. These annotations ultimately shape the behavior of AI systems. Given the scale of ML datasets, which can contain thousands to billions of data points, cost and efficiency play a major role in how data annotations are collected. Yet, important challenges arise between the goals of meeting scale-related needs while also collecting data in a way that reflects real-world nuance and variation. Annotators are typically treated as interchangeable workers who provide a ‘view from nowhere’. We question assumptions of universal ground truth by focusing on the social and ethical aspects that shape annotation task design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信