生成分布感知的公平性测试

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Sai Sathiesh Rajan , Ezekiel Soremekun , Yves Le Traon , Sudipta Chattopadhyay
{"title":"生成分布感知的公平性测试","authors":"Sai Sathiesh Rajan ,&nbsp;Ezekiel Soremekun ,&nbsp;Yves Le Traon ,&nbsp;Sudipta Chattopadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring that all classes of objects are detected with equal accuracy is essential in AI systems. For instance, being unable to identify any one class of objects could have fatal consequences in autonomous driving systems. Hence, ensuring the reliability of image recognition systems is crucial. This work addresses <em>how to validate group fairness in image recognition software</em>. We propose a <em>distribution-aware fairness testing</em> approach (called DISTROFAIR) that systematically exposes class-level fairness violations in image classifiers via a synergistic combination of <em>out-of-distribution (OOD) testing</em> and <em>semantic-preserving image mutation</em>. DISTROFAIR automatically <em>learns the distribution</em> (e.g., number/orientation) of objects in a set of images. Then it <em>systematically mutates objects in the images</em> to become OOD using three <em>semantic-preserving image mutations</em> – <em>object deletion</em>, <em>object insertion</em> and <em>object rotation</em>. We evaluate DISTROFAIR using two well-known datasets (CityScapes and MS-COCO) and three major, commercial image recognition software (namely, Amazon Rekognition, Google Cloud Vision and Azure Computer Vision). Results show that about 21% of images generated by DISTROFAIR reveal class-level fairness violations using either ground truth or metamorphic oracles. DISTROFAIR is up to 2.3× more effective than two main <em>baselines</em>, i.e., (a) an approach which focuses on generating images only <em>within the distribution</em> (ID) and (b) fairness analysis using only the original image dataset. We further observed that DISTROFAIR is efficient, it generates 460 images per hour, on average. Finally, we evaluate the semantic validity of our approach via a user study with 81 participants, using 30 real images and 30 corresponding mutated images generated by DISTROFAIR. We found that images generated by DISTROFAIR are 80% as realistic as real-world images.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution-aware fairness test generation\",\"authors\":\"Sai Sathiesh Rajan ,&nbsp;Ezekiel Soremekun ,&nbsp;Yves Le Traon ,&nbsp;Sudipta Chattopadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring that all classes of objects are detected with equal accuracy is essential in AI systems. For instance, being unable to identify any one class of objects could have fatal consequences in autonomous driving systems. Hence, ensuring the reliability of image recognition systems is crucial. This work addresses <em>how to validate group fairness in image recognition software</em>. We propose a <em>distribution-aware fairness testing</em> approach (called DISTROFAIR) that systematically exposes class-level fairness violations in image classifiers via a synergistic combination of <em>out-of-distribution (OOD) testing</em> and <em>semantic-preserving image mutation</em>. DISTROFAIR automatically <em>learns the distribution</em> (e.g., number/orientation) of objects in a set of images. Then it <em>systematically mutates objects in the images</em> to become OOD using three <em>semantic-preserving image mutations</em> – <em>object deletion</em>, <em>object insertion</em> and <em>object rotation</em>. We evaluate DISTROFAIR using two well-known datasets (CityScapes and MS-COCO) and three major, commercial image recognition software (namely, Amazon Rekognition, Google Cloud Vision and Azure Computer Vision). Results show that about 21% of images generated by DISTROFAIR reveal class-level fairness violations using either ground truth or metamorphic oracles. DISTROFAIR is up to 2.3× more effective than two main <em>baselines</em>, i.e., (a) an approach which focuses on generating images only <em>within the distribution</em> (ID) and (b) fairness analysis using only the original image dataset. We further observed that DISTROFAIR is efficient, it generates 460 images per hour, on average. Finally, we evaluate the semantic validity of our approach via a user study with 81 participants, using 30 real images and 30 corresponding mutated images generated by DISTROFAIR. We found that images generated by DISTROFAIR are 80% as realistic as real-world images.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224001353\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224001353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人工智能系统中,确保以同样的准确度检测到所有类别的物体至关重要。例如,在自动驾驶系统中,无法识别任何一类物体都可能造成致命后果。因此,确保图像识别系统的可靠性至关重要。这项工作涉及如何验证图像识别软件中的群体公平性。我们提出了一种分布感知公平性测试方法(称为 DISTROFAIR),它通过分布外(OOD)测试和语义保护图像突变的协同组合,系统性地揭露图像分类器中的类级公平性违规行为。DISTROFAIR 可自动学习一组图像中对象的分布(如数量/方向)。然后,它通过三种语义保护图像突变--对象删除、对象插入和对象旋转--系统地突变图像中的对象,使其成为 OOD。我们使用两个著名的数据集(CityScapes 和 MS-COCO)和三个主要的商业图像识别软件(即 Amazon Rekognition、Google Cloud Vision 和 Azure Computer Vision)对 DISTROFAIR 进行了评估。结果表明,使用 DISTROFAIR 生成的图像中,约有 21% 在使用地面实况或蜕变指标时显示出违反类级公平性的情况。DISTROFAIR 比两个主要基线(即 (a) 仅在分布 (ID) 范围内生成图像的方法和 (b) 仅使用原始图像数据集进行公平性分析)高出 2.3 倍。我们进一步观察到,DISTROFAIR 的效率很高,平均每小时可生成 460 幅图像。最后,我们使用 DISTROFAIR 生成的 30 幅真实图像和 30 幅相应的变异图像,通过对 81 名参与者进行用户研究,评估了我们方法的语义有效性。我们发现,DISTROFAIR 生成的图像有 80% 与真实世界的图像一样逼真。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distribution-aware fairness test generation

Ensuring that all classes of objects are detected with equal accuracy is essential in AI systems. For instance, being unable to identify any one class of objects could have fatal consequences in autonomous driving systems. Hence, ensuring the reliability of image recognition systems is crucial. This work addresses how to validate group fairness in image recognition software. We propose a distribution-aware fairness testing approach (called DISTROFAIR) that systematically exposes class-level fairness violations in image classifiers via a synergistic combination of out-of-distribution (OOD) testing and semantic-preserving image mutation. DISTROFAIR automatically learns the distribution (e.g., number/orientation) of objects in a set of images. Then it systematically mutates objects in the images to become OOD using three semantic-preserving image mutationsobject deletion, object insertion and object rotation. We evaluate DISTROFAIR using two well-known datasets (CityScapes and MS-COCO) and three major, commercial image recognition software (namely, Amazon Rekognition, Google Cloud Vision and Azure Computer Vision). Results show that about 21% of images generated by DISTROFAIR reveal class-level fairness violations using either ground truth or metamorphic oracles. DISTROFAIR is up to 2.3× more effective than two main baselines, i.e., (a) an approach which focuses on generating images only within the distribution (ID) and (b) fairness analysis using only the original image dataset. We further observed that DISTROFAIR is efficient, it generates 460 images per hour, on average. Finally, we evaluate the semantic validity of our approach via a user study with 81 participants, using 30 real images and 30 corresponding mutated images generated by DISTROFAIR. We found that images generated by DISTROFAIR are 80% as realistic as real-world images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: • Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution • Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development • Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems • Human factors and management concerns of software development • Data management and big data issues of software systems • Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources • Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信