不是灵丹妙药"--专家对抗逆力概念及其在姑息关怀中的潜力的看法。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241254839
Katja Maus, Frank Peusquens, Milena Kriegsmann-Rabe, Julia-Katharina Matthias, Gülay Ateş, Birgit Jaspers, Franziska Geiser, Lukas Radbruch
{"title":"不是灵丹妙药\"--专家对抗逆力概念及其在姑息关怀中的潜力的看法。","authors":"Katja Maus, Frank Peusquens, Milena Kriegsmann-Rabe, Julia-Katharina Matthias, Gülay Ateş, Birgit Jaspers, Franziska Geiser, Lukas Radbruch","doi":"10.1177/26323524241254839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resilience is an increasingly used term in medicine and subject to various definitions, often not easy to grasp. There are established core concepts for patients receiving palliative care, for example, meaning in life, that have already been researched a lot. Resilience, relative to these concepts, is a new object of research in palliative care, where it has so far been used predominantly with regard to the well-being of teams.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how experts in palliative care define the concept of resilience and its suitability for patients, significant others, and professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using summarizing content analysis according to Mayring.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-one health and social care professionals with expertise caring for persons with life-threatening/limiting illnesses and their relatives were interviewed in three individual interviews and four focus groups. All conversations were recorded, transcribed, coded <i>via</i> MAXQDA, and validated by another researcher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resilience has been described as something procedural, dynamic, individual, and flexible. In connection with well-known concepts such as posttraumatic growth or terms from the field of mindfulness, social environment or personal factors have also been linked to resilience. Resources such as spirituality can contribute to resilience, and resilience itself can function as a resource, for example, by contributing to quality of life. An active use of the term in practical work with patients or relatives is rare, but it is used in education or team measures. Limited lifespan can pose a challenge to an active use of the concept of resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resilience as a very individual approach provides added value to other core concepts of palliative care. Within the palliative context, the normative dimension of resilience must be well reflected. A broader definition of resilience is recommended, leaving room for everyone to find their own form of resilience. The concept of resilience in palliative care includes opportunities as well as risks and should, therefore, be implemented carefully, requiring specific training.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"18 ","pages":"26323524241254839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Not a panacea' - Expert perspectives on the concept of resilience and its potential for palliative care.\",\"authors\":\"Katja Maus, Frank Peusquens, Milena Kriegsmann-Rabe, Julia-Katharina Matthias, Gülay Ateş, Birgit Jaspers, Franziska Geiser, Lukas Radbruch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524241254839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resilience is an increasingly used term in medicine and subject to various definitions, often not easy to grasp. There are established core concepts for patients receiving palliative care, for example, meaning in life, that have already been researched a lot. Resilience, relative to these concepts, is a new object of research in palliative care, where it has so far been used predominantly with regard to the well-being of teams.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how experts in palliative care define the concept of resilience and its suitability for patients, significant others, and professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study using summarizing content analysis according to Mayring.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-one health and social care professionals with expertise caring for persons with life-threatening/limiting illnesses and their relatives were interviewed in three individual interviews and four focus groups. All conversations were recorded, transcribed, coded <i>via</i> MAXQDA, and validated by another researcher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resilience has been described as something procedural, dynamic, individual, and flexible. In connection with well-known concepts such as posttraumatic growth or terms from the field of mindfulness, social environment or personal factors have also been linked to resilience. Resources such as spirituality can contribute to resilience, and resilience itself can function as a resource, for example, by contributing to quality of life. An active use of the term in practical work with patients or relatives is rare, but it is used in education or team measures. Limited lifespan can pose a challenge to an active use of the concept of resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resilience as a very individual approach provides added value to other core concepts of palliative care. Within the palliative context, the normative dimension of resilience must be well reflected. A broader definition of resilience is recommended, leaving room for everyone to find their own form of resilience. The concept of resilience in palliative care includes opportunities as well as risks and should, therefore, be implemented carefully, requiring specific training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"26323524241254839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241254839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241254839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复原力是一个在医学中使用日益广泛的术语,其定义多种多样,往往不易掌握。对于接受姑息关怀的病人来说,已经有了一些既定的核心概念,例如生命的意义,这些概念已经得到了大量的研究。与这些概念相比,抗逆力是姑息关怀领域的一个新的研究对象,迄今为止,它主要用于团队的福祉方面。目的:探讨姑息关怀领域的专家如何定义抗逆力概念及其对患者、重要他人和专业人员的适用性:环境/参与者:21 位具有抗逆力的医疗和社会关怀专业人士:21 名医护和社会护理专业人员在三次个人访谈和四次焦点小组中接受了采访,这些专业人员具有护理危及生命/临终疾病患者及其亲属的专业知识。所有谈话均已记录、转录,并通过 MAXQDA 进行编码,由另一位研究人员进行验证:复原力被描述为程序性的、动态的、个体的和灵活的。与创伤后成长等众所周知的概念或正念领域的术语相关联,社会环境或个人因素也与复原力有关。精神等资源可以促进复原力,而复原力本身也可以作为一种资源发挥作用,例如通过提高生活质量。在与患者或亲属的实际工作中,很少主动使用这一术语,但在教育或团队措施中会使用。有限的寿命可能会对积极使用复原力概念构成挑战:抗逆力作为一种非常个性化的方法,为姑息关怀的其他核心概念提供了附加价值。在姑息关怀的背景下,抗逆力的规范性维度必须得到很好的体现。建议对抗逆力进行更广泛的定义,为每个人找到自己的抗逆力形式留出空间。姑息关怀中的抗逆力概念既包括机遇,也包括风险,因此应谨慎实施,需要专门的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Not a panacea' - Expert perspectives on the concept of resilience and its potential for palliative care.

Background: Resilience is an increasingly used term in medicine and subject to various definitions, often not easy to grasp. There are established core concepts for patients receiving palliative care, for example, meaning in life, that have already been researched a lot. Resilience, relative to these concepts, is a new object of research in palliative care, where it has so far been used predominantly with regard to the well-being of teams.

Aim: To explore how experts in palliative care define the concept of resilience and its suitability for patients, significant others, and professionals.

Design: Qualitative study using summarizing content analysis according to Mayring.

Setting/participants: Twenty-one health and social care professionals with expertise caring for persons with life-threatening/limiting illnesses and their relatives were interviewed in three individual interviews and four focus groups. All conversations were recorded, transcribed, coded via MAXQDA, and validated by another researcher.

Results: Resilience has been described as something procedural, dynamic, individual, and flexible. In connection with well-known concepts such as posttraumatic growth or terms from the field of mindfulness, social environment or personal factors have also been linked to resilience. Resources such as spirituality can contribute to resilience, and resilience itself can function as a resource, for example, by contributing to quality of life. An active use of the term in practical work with patients or relatives is rare, but it is used in education or team measures. Limited lifespan can pose a challenge to an active use of the concept of resilience.

Conclusion: Resilience as a very individual approach provides added value to other core concepts of palliative care. Within the palliative context, the normative dimension of resilience must be well reflected. A broader definition of resilience is recommended, leaving room for everyone to find their own form of resilience. The concept of resilience in palliative care includes opportunities as well as risks and should, therefore, be implemented carefully, requiring specific training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信