病人如何与全科医生讨论夫妻关系问题:一项访谈研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0044
Siri Dalsmo Berge, Mette Brekke, Eivind Meland, Thomas Mildestvedt
{"title":"病人如何与全科医生讨论夫妻关系问题:一项访谈研究。","authors":"Siri Dalsmo Berge, Mette Brekke, Eivind Meland, Thomas Mildestvedt","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Couple relationship satisfaction is related to good physical and mental health and longevity. Many patients have discussed or wish to discuss their couple relationship with their general practitioner (GP) and look for personalised care and support when discussing topics they perceive as sensitive.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patient experiences of discussing couple relationship problems in GP consultations.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with patients from general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individual interviews with 18 patients who had discussed their couple relationship with their GP. Participants were recruited through both social and traditional media, and all interviews were digitally recorded. The purposive sample comprised thirteen women and five men, representing diverse age groups, backgrounds, and relationship problems. All participants identified as heterosexual. We analysed interview data thematically using systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes emerged: (i) GPs in a facilitating role, not on an assembly line; (ii) Navigating the \"elephant in the room\"; (iii) GPs as biomedically competent life witnesses. GP continuity was vital in fostering the trust required to discuss sensitive topics, such as relationship issues. Participants valued a biopsychosocial approach which incorporated knowledge of close relationships into medical consultations. They appreciated both GP support and constructive challenges that prompted them to take responsibility for relationship improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients value their GPs' holistic, supportive, and direct approach in addressing couple relationship problems, although they perceive that GPs do not always have sufficient time. They welcome relevant challenges that can drive positive change.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How patients experience discussing couple relationship problems with general practitioners: an interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Siri Dalsmo Berge, Mette Brekke, Eivind Meland, Thomas Mildestvedt\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Couple relationship satisfaction is related to good physical and mental health and longevity. Many patients have discussed or wish to discuss their couple relationship with their general practitioner (GP) and look for personalised care and support when discussing topics they perceive as sensitive.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore patient experiences of discussing couple relationship problems in GP consultations.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with patients from general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individual interviews with 18 patients who had discussed their couple relationship with their GP. Participants were recruited through both social and traditional media, and all interviews were digitally recorded. The purposive sample comprised thirteen women and five men, representing diverse age groups, backgrounds, and relationship problems. All participants identified as heterosexual. We analysed interview data thematically using systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes emerged: (i) GPs in a facilitating role, not on an assembly line; (ii) Navigating the \\\"elephant in the room\\\"; (iii) GPs as biomedically competent life witnesses. GP continuity was vital in fostering the trust required to discuss sensitive topics, such as relationship issues. Participants valued a biopsychosocial approach which incorporated knowledge of close relationships into medical consultations. They appreciated both GP support and constructive challenges that prompted them to take responsibility for relationship improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients value their GPs' holistic, supportive, and direct approach in addressing couple relationship problems, although they perceive that GPs do not always have sufficient time. They welcome relevant challenges that can drive positive change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景夫妻关系满意度与良好的身心健康和长寿有关。许多患者已经或希望与他们的全科医生(GP)讨论他们的夫妻关系,并在讨论他们认为敏感的话题时寻求个性化的护理和支持。目的:探讨患者在全科医生咨询中讨论夫妻关系问题的经历:定性研究:采用半结构化访谈的方式对全科医生中的患者进行访谈:方法:对 18 名曾与全科医生讨论过夫妻关系问题的患者进行个人访谈。参与者是通过社交媒体和传统媒体招募的,所有访谈都进行了数字录音。目的性样本包括 13 名女性和 5 名男性,代表了不同的年龄组、背景和关系问题。所有参与者均为异性恋。我们采用系统文本浓缩法对访谈数据进行了专题分析:出现了三大主题:(i) 全科医生发挥促进作用,而不是流水线上的工作;(ii) 引导 "房间里的大象";(iii) 全科医生是生物医学上合格的生命见证人。全科医生的连续性对于培养讨论关系问题等敏感话题所需的信任至关重要。参与者重视将亲密关系知识纳入医疗咨询的生物心理社会方法。他们既感谢全科医生的支持,也感谢全科医生提出的建设性挑战,这些挑战促使他们承担起改善人际关系的责任:患者重视全科医生在解决夫妻关系问题时所采取的全面、支持性和直接的方法,尽管他们认为全科医生并不总是有足够的时间。他们欢迎能够推动积极改变的相关挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How patients experience discussing couple relationship problems with general practitioners: an interview study.

Background: Couple relationship satisfaction is related to good physical and mental health and longevity. Many patients have discussed or wish to discuss their couple relationship with their general practitioner (GP) and look for personalised care and support when discussing topics they perceive as sensitive.

Aim: To explore patient experiences of discussing couple relationship problems in GP consultations.

Design & setting: Qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews with patients from general practice.

Method: Individual interviews with 18 patients who had discussed their couple relationship with their GP. Participants were recruited through both social and traditional media, and all interviews were digitally recorded. The purposive sample comprised thirteen women and five men, representing diverse age groups, backgrounds, and relationship problems. All participants identified as heterosexual. We analysed interview data thematically using systematic text condensation.

Results: Three main themes emerged: (i) GPs in a facilitating role, not on an assembly line; (ii) Navigating the "elephant in the room"; (iii) GPs as biomedically competent life witnesses. GP continuity was vital in fostering the trust required to discuss sensitive topics, such as relationship issues. Participants valued a biopsychosocial approach which incorporated knowledge of close relationships into medical consultations. They appreciated both GP support and constructive challenges that prompted them to take responsibility for relationship improvements.

Conclusion: Patients value their GPs' holistic, supportive, and direct approach in addressing couple relationship problems, although they perceive that GPs do not always have sufficient time. They welcome relevant challenges that can drive positive change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信