Luís Antunes Gomes, Rita Fernandes, Carmen Caeiro, Ana Rita Henriques, Rute Dinis de Sousa, Jaime C Branco, Fernando Pimentel-Santos, Rubina Moniz, Lilia Vicente, Helena Canhão, Ana Maria Rodrigues, Eduardo Brazete Cruz
{"title":"基层医疗机构管理腰背痛患者的分层方法(SPLIT 计划):前后对比研究","authors":"Luís Antunes Gomes, Rita Fernandes, Carmen Caeiro, Ana Rita Henriques, Rute Dinis de Sousa, Jaime C Branco, Fernando Pimentel-Santos, Rubina Moniz, Lilia Vicente, Helena Canhão, Ana Maria Rodrigues, Eduardo Brazete Cruz","doi":"10.1370/afm.3104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effects of stratified primary care for low back pain (SPLIT program) in decreasing back-related disability for patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a before-and-after study. We compared health-related outcomes for 2 sequential, independent cohorts of patients with LBP recruited at 7 primary care units in Portugal. The first prospective cohort study characterized usual care (UC) and collected data from February to September 2018. The second was performed when the SPLIT program was implemented and collected data from November 2018 to October 2021. Between cohorts, physical therapists were trained in the implementation of the SPLIT program, which used the STarT Back Screening Tool to categorize patients for matched treatment. We compared back-related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, 0-24 points), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 0-10 points), perceived effect of treatment (Global Perceived Effect Scale, -5 to +5 points), and health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 levels index, 0-1 points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled a total of 447 patients: 115 in the UC cohort (mostly treated with pharmacologic treatment) and 332 in the SPLIT cohort (all referred for a physical therapy intervention program). Over the study period of 6 months, patients in the SPLIT program showed significantly greater improvements in back-related disability (ß, -2.94; 95% CI, -3.63 to -2.24; <i>P</i> ≤ .001), pain (ß, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.57; <i>P</i> ≤ .001), perceived effect of treatment (ß, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.82; <i>P</i> ≤ .001), and health-related quality of life (ß, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.14; <i>P</i> ≤ .001) compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in the SPLIT program for LBP showed greater benefits regarding health-related outcomes than those receiving UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"22 3","pages":"195-202"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Stratified Approach for Managing Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care (SPLIT Program): A Before-and-After Study.\",\"authors\":\"Luís Antunes Gomes, Rita Fernandes, Carmen Caeiro, Ana Rita Henriques, Rute Dinis de Sousa, Jaime C Branco, Fernando Pimentel-Santos, Rubina Moniz, Lilia Vicente, Helena Canhão, Ana Maria Rodrigues, Eduardo Brazete Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.3104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the effects of stratified primary care for low back pain (SPLIT program) in decreasing back-related disability for patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a before-and-after study. We compared health-related outcomes for 2 sequential, independent cohorts of patients with LBP recruited at 7 primary care units in Portugal. The first prospective cohort study characterized usual care (UC) and collected data from February to September 2018. The second was performed when the SPLIT program was implemented and collected data from November 2018 to October 2021. Between cohorts, physical therapists were trained in the implementation of the SPLIT program, which used the STarT Back Screening Tool to categorize patients for matched treatment. We compared back-related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, 0-24 points), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 0-10 points), perceived effect of treatment (Global Perceived Effect Scale, -5 to +5 points), and health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 levels index, 0-1 points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled a total of 447 patients: 115 in the UC cohort (mostly treated with pharmacologic treatment) and 332 in the SPLIT cohort (all referred for a physical therapy intervention program). Over the study period of 6 months, patients in the SPLIT program showed significantly greater improvements in back-related disability (ß, -2.94; 95% CI, -3.63 to -2.24; <i>P</i> ≤ .001), pain (ß, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.57; <i>P</i> ≤ .001), perceived effect of treatment (ß, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.82; <i>P</i> ≤ .001), and health-related quality of life (ß, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.14; <i>P</i> ≤ .001) compared with UC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients in the SPLIT program for LBP showed greater benefits regarding health-related outcomes than those receiving UC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"195-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237233/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Stratified Approach for Managing Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care (SPLIT Program): A Before-and-After Study.
Purpose: To determine the effects of stratified primary care for low back pain (SPLIT program) in decreasing back-related disability for patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care.
Methods: We conducted a before-and-after study. We compared health-related outcomes for 2 sequential, independent cohorts of patients with LBP recruited at 7 primary care units in Portugal. The first prospective cohort study characterized usual care (UC) and collected data from February to September 2018. The second was performed when the SPLIT program was implemented and collected data from November 2018 to October 2021. Between cohorts, physical therapists were trained in the implementation of the SPLIT program, which used the STarT Back Screening Tool to categorize patients for matched treatment. We compared back-related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, 0-24 points), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 0-10 points), perceived effect of treatment (Global Perceived Effect Scale, -5 to +5 points), and health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 levels index, 0-1 points).
Results: We enrolled a total of 447 patients: 115 in the UC cohort (mostly treated with pharmacologic treatment) and 332 in the SPLIT cohort (all referred for a physical therapy intervention program). Over the study period of 6 months, patients in the SPLIT program showed significantly greater improvements in back-related disability (ß, -2.94; 95% CI, -3.63 to -2.24; P ≤ .001), pain (ß, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.57; P ≤ .001), perceived effect of treatment (ß, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.82; P ≤ .001), and health-related quality of life (ß, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.14; P ≤ .001) compared with UC.
Conclusions: Patients in the SPLIT program for LBP showed greater benefits regarding health-related outcomes than those receiving UC.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.