{"title":"\"生死攸关\":在后大流行病时代缩小使用卫生信息技术方面的灰色数字鸿沟。","authors":"Maxwell Huang, Yinjiao Ye","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2358279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A pervasive issue in healthcare is that elderly populations have fallen far behind in using healthcare technologies, a phenomenon known as the gray digital divide. Even more concerningly, the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically catalyzed health digitization with the potential for lasting demographic-wide impacts. Against this backdrop and drawing on both the digital divide literature and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2), we investigated elderly populations' usage of healthcare technologies through analyzing HINTS 6 (2022) survey data. Results show a widespread first- and second-level digital divide in using health information technologies (HITs) between people aged 65 and up and people aged 18-64, including Internet access, health-related Internet use, health-related social media use, health app use, use of wearable electronic health devices, telehealth visits, and accessing online medical records. Moreover, this study finds that education consistently positively predicts Internet use and use of various HITs by the elderly; income is the next reliable predictor but not as consistent as education. Health-related variables are less consistent in predicting the elderly's use of HITs. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed to inform the mitigation of the gray digital divide in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"620-630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"A Matter of Life and Death\\\": Mitigating the Gray Digital Divide in Using Health Information Technologies in the Post-Pandemic Era.\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell Huang, Yinjiao Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2024.2358279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A pervasive issue in healthcare is that elderly populations have fallen far behind in using healthcare technologies, a phenomenon known as the gray digital divide. Even more concerningly, the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically catalyzed health digitization with the potential for lasting demographic-wide impacts. Against this backdrop and drawing on both the digital divide literature and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2), we investigated elderly populations' usage of healthcare technologies through analyzing HINTS 6 (2022) survey data. Results show a widespread first- and second-level digital divide in using health information technologies (HITs) between people aged 65 and up and people aged 18-64, including Internet access, health-related Internet use, health-related social media use, health app use, use of wearable electronic health devices, telehealth visits, and accessing online medical records. Moreover, this study finds that education consistently positively predicts Internet use and use of various HITs by the elderly; income is the next reliable predictor but not as consistent as education. Health-related variables are less consistent in predicting the elderly's use of HITs. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed to inform the mitigation of the gray digital divide in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"620-630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2358279\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2358279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
"A Matter of Life and Death": Mitigating the Gray Digital Divide in Using Health Information Technologies in the Post-Pandemic Era.
A pervasive issue in healthcare is that elderly populations have fallen far behind in using healthcare technologies, a phenomenon known as the gray digital divide. Even more concerningly, the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically catalyzed health digitization with the potential for lasting demographic-wide impacts. Against this backdrop and drawing on both the digital divide literature and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2), we investigated elderly populations' usage of healthcare technologies through analyzing HINTS 6 (2022) survey data. Results show a widespread first- and second-level digital divide in using health information technologies (HITs) between people aged 65 and up and people aged 18-64, including Internet access, health-related Internet use, health-related social media use, health app use, use of wearable electronic health devices, telehealth visits, and accessing online medical records. Moreover, this study finds that education consistently positively predicts Internet use and use of various HITs by the elderly; income is the next reliable predictor but not as consistent as education. Health-related variables are less consistent in predicting the elderly's use of HITs. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed to inform the mitigation of the gray digital divide in healthcare.
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.