欧洲人群肠道微生物群与代谢综合征之间的因果效应:一项双向泯灭随机研究。

IF 6.1 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jiawu Yan, Zhongyuan Wang, Guojian Bao, Cailin Xue, Wenxuan Zheng, Rao Fu, Minglu Zhang, Jialu Ding, Fei Yang, Beicheng Sun
{"title":"欧洲人群肠道微生物群与代谢综合征之间的因果效应:一项双向泯灭随机研究。","authors":"Jiawu Yan, Zhongyuan Wang, Guojian Bao, Cailin Xue, Wenxuan Zheng, Rao Fu, Minglu Zhang, Jialu Ding, Fei Yang, Beicheng Sun","doi":"10.1186/s13578-024-01232-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies have reported that gut microbiota composition is associated with metabolic syndrome. However, the causal effect of gut microbiota on metabolic syndrome has yet to be confirmed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study to investigate the causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population. Summary statistics of gut microbiota were from the largest available genome-wide association study meta-analysis (n = 13,266) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary statistics of outcome were obtained from the most comprehensive genome-wide association studies of metabolic syndrome (n = 291,107). The inverse-variance weighted method was applied as the primary method, and the robustness of the results was assessed by a series of sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary causal estimates, Actinobacteria (OR = 0.935, 95% CI = 0.878-0.996, P = 0.037), Bifidobacteriales (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Bifidobacteriaceae (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Desulfovibrio (OR = 0.920, 95% CI = 0.869-0.975, P = 0.005), and RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.803-0.969, P = 0.009) may be associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while Lachnospiraceae (OR = 1.130, 95% CI = 1.016-1.257, P = 0.025), Veillonellaceae (OR = 1.055, 95% CI = 1.004-1.108, P = 0.034) and Olsenella (OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.009-1.085, P = 0.015) may be linked to a higher risk for metabolic syndrome. Reverse MR analysis demonstrated that abundance of RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.886-0.994, P = 0.030) may be downregulated by metabolic syndrome. Sensitivity analyses indicated no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our Mendelian randomization study provided causal relationship between specific gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome, which might provide new insights into the potential pathogenic mechanisms of gut microbiota in metabolic syndrome and the assignment of effective therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49095,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Bioscience","volume":"14 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11134679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiawu Yan, Zhongyuan Wang, Guojian Bao, Cailin Xue, Wenxuan Zheng, Rao Fu, Minglu Zhang, Jialu Ding, Fei Yang, Beicheng Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13578-024-01232-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies have reported that gut microbiota composition is associated with metabolic syndrome. However, the causal effect of gut microbiota on metabolic syndrome has yet to be confirmed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study to investigate the causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population. Summary statistics of gut microbiota were from the largest available genome-wide association study meta-analysis (n = 13,266) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary statistics of outcome were obtained from the most comprehensive genome-wide association studies of metabolic syndrome (n = 291,107). The inverse-variance weighted method was applied as the primary method, and the robustness of the results was assessed by a series of sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary causal estimates, Actinobacteria (OR = 0.935, 95% CI = 0.878-0.996, P = 0.037), Bifidobacteriales (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Bifidobacteriaceae (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Desulfovibrio (OR = 0.920, 95% CI = 0.869-0.975, P = 0.005), and RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.803-0.969, P = 0.009) may be associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while Lachnospiraceae (OR = 1.130, 95% CI = 1.016-1.257, P = 0.025), Veillonellaceae (OR = 1.055, 95% CI = 1.004-1.108, P = 0.034) and Olsenella (OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.009-1.085, P = 0.015) may be linked to a higher risk for metabolic syndrome. Reverse MR analysis demonstrated that abundance of RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.886-0.994, P = 0.030) may be downregulated by metabolic syndrome. Sensitivity analyses indicated no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our Mendelian randomization study provided causal relationship between specific gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome, which might provide new insights into the potential pathogenic mechanisms of gut microbiota in metabolic syndrome and the assignment of effective therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell and Bioscience\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11134679/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell and Bioscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-024-01232-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-024-01232-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察性研究报告称,肠道微生物群的组成与代谢综合征有关。然而,肠道微生物群对代谢综合征的因果效应尚未得到证实:我们进行了一项双向孟德尔随机研究,以调查欧洲人群中肠道微生物群与代谢综合征之间的因果关系。肠道微生物群的汇总统计数据来自 MiBioGen 联盟进行的现有最大的全基因组关联研究荟萃分析(n = 13266)。结果的汇总统计数据来自最全面的代谢综合征全基因组关联研究(n = 291 107)。主要方法是采用逆方差加权法,并通过一系列敏感性分析评估结果的稳健性:在主要因果关系估计中,放线菌(OR = 0.935,95% CI = 0.878-0.996,P = 0.037)、双歧杆菌(OR = 0.928,95% CI = 0.868-0.992,P = 0.028)、双歧杆菌科(OR = 0.928,95% CI = 0.868-0.992,P = 0.028)、脱硫弧菌科(OR = 0.920,95% CI = 0.869-0.975,P = 0.005)和反刍球菌科UCG010(OR = 0.882,95% CI = 0.803-0.969,P = 0.009)可能与较低的代谢综合征风险有关,而Lachnospiraceae(OR = 1.130,95% CI = 1.016-1.257,P = 0.025)、Veillonellaceae(OR = 1.055,95% CI = 1.004-1.108,P = 0.034)和Olsenella(OR = 1.046,95% CI = 1.009-1.085,P = 0.015)可能与代谢综合征的高风险有关。反向 MR 分析表明,代谢综合征可能会下调反刍动物UCG010 的丰度(OR = 0.938,95% CI = 0.886-0.994,P = 0.030)。敏感性分析表明没有异质性或水平多效性:我们的孟德尔随机化研究提供了特定肠道微生物群与代谢综合征之间的因果关系,这可能会对代谢综合征中肠道微生物群的潜在致病机制以及有效治疗策略的分配提供新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study.

Background: Observational studies have reported that gut microbiota composition is associated with metabolic syndrome. However, the causal effect of gut microbiota on metabolic syndrome has yet to be confirmed.

Methods: We performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study to investigate the causal effect between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome in European population. Summary statistics of gut microbiota were from the largest available genome-wide association study meta-analysis (n = 13,266) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary statistics of outcome were obtained from the most comprehensive genome-wide association studies of metabolic syndrome (n = 291,107). The inverse-variance weighted method was applied as the primary method, and the robustness of the results was assessed by a series of sensitivity analyses.

Results: In the primary causal estimates, Actinobacteria (OR = 0.935, 95% CI = 0.878-0.996, P = 0.037), Bifidobacteriales (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Bifidobacteriaceae (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.868-0.992, P = 0.028), Desulfovibrio (OR = 0.920, 95% CI = 0.869-0.975, P = 0.005), and RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.803-0.969, P = 0.009) may be associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, while Lachnospiraceae (OR = 1.130, 95% CI = 1.016-1.257, P = 0.025), Veillonellaceae (OR = 1.055, 95% CI = 1.004-1.108, P = 0.034) and Olsenella (OR = 1.046, 95% CI = 1.009-1.085, P = 0.015) may be linked to a higher risk for metabolic syndrome. Reverse MR analysis demonstrated that abundance of RuminococcaceaeUCG010 (OR = 0.938, 95% CI = 0.886-0.994, P = 0.030) may be downregulated by metabolic syndrome. Sensitivity analyses indicated no heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy.

Conclusions: Our Mendelian randomization study provided causal relationship between specific gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome, which might provide new insights into the potential pathogenic mechanisms of gut microbiota in metabolic syndrome and the assignment of effective therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell and Bioscience
Cell and Bioscience BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell and Bioscience, the official journal of the Society of Chinese Bioscientists in America, is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all areas of life science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信