支持国家血清学报告的 SARS-CoV-2 最低数据标准。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1177/00045632241261274
Esmond Urwin, Joanne Martin, Neil Sebire, Andy Harris, Jenny Johnson, Erum Masood, Gordon Milligan, Lucy Mairs, Antony Chuter, Michael Ferguson, Philip Quinlan, Emily Jefferson
{"title":"支持国家血清学报告的 SARS-CoV-2 最低数据标准。","authors":"Esmond Urwin, Joanne Martin, Neil Sebire, Andy Harris, Jenny Johnson, Erum Masood, Gordon Milligan, Lucy Mairs, Antony Chuter, Michael Ferguson, Philip Quinlan, Emily Jefferson","doi":"10.1177/00045632241261274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare laboratory systems produce and capture a vast array of information, yet do not always report all of this to the national infrastructure within the United Kingdom. The global COVID-19 pandemic brought about a much greater need for detailed healthcare data, one such instance being laboratory testing data. The reporting of qualitative laboratory test results (e.g. positive, negative or indeterminate) provides a basic understanding of levels of seropositivity. However, to better understand and interpret seropositivity, how it is determined and other factors that affect its calculation (i.e. levels of antibodies), quantitative laboratory test data are needed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>36 data attributes were collected from 3 NHS laboratories and 29 CO-CONNECT project partner organisations. These were assessed against the need for a minimum dataset to determine data attribute importance. An NHS laboratory feasibility study was undertaken to assess the minimum data standard, together with a literature review of national and international data standards and healthcare reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A COVID serology minimum data standard (CSMDS) comprising 12 data attributes was created and verified by 3 NHS laboratories to allow national granular reporting of COVID serology results. To support this, a standardised set of vocabulary terms was developed to represent laboratory analyser systems and laboratory information management systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper puts forward a minimum viable standard for COVID-19 serology data attributes to enhance its granularity and augment the national reporting of COVID-19 serology laboratory results, with implications for future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"418-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A SARS-CoV-2 minimum data standard to support national serology reporting.\",\"authors\":\"Esmond Urwin, Joanne Martin, Neil Sebire, Andy Harris, Jenny Johnson, Erum Masood, Gordon Milligan, Lucy Mairs, Antony Chuter, Michael Ferguson, Philip Quinlan, Emily Jefferson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632241261274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare laboratory systems produce and capture a vast array of information, yet do not always report all of this to the national infrastructure within the United Kingdom. The global COVID-19 pandemic brought about a much greater need for detailed healthcare data, one such instance being laboratory testing data. The reporting of qualitative laboratory test results (e.g. positive, negative or indeterminate) provides a basic understanding of levels of seropositivity. However, to better understand and interpret seropositivity, how it is determined and other factors that affect its calculation (i.e. levels of antibodies), quantitative laboratory test data are needed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>36 data attributes were collected from 3 NHS laboratories and 29 CO-CONNECT project partner organisations. These were assessed against the need for a minimum dataset to determine data attribute importance. An NHS laboratory feasibility study was undertaken to assess the minimum data standard, together with a literature review of national and international data standards and healthcare reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A COVID serology minimum data standard (CSMDS) comprising 12 data attributes was created and verified by 3 NHS laboratories to allow national granular reporting of COVID serology results. To support this, a standardised set of vocabulary terms was developed to represent laboratory analyser systems and laboratory information management systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper puts forward a minimum viable standard for COVID-19 serology data attributes to enhance its granularity and augment the national reporting of COVID-19 serology laboratory results, with implications for future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"418-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241261274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241261274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健实验室系统产生并捕获了大量信息,但并不总能向英国国家基础设施报告所有这些信息。全球 COVID-19 大流行对详细的医疗保健数据提出了更高的要求,实验室检测数据就是其中之一。定性实验室检测结果(如阳性、阴性或不确定)的报告提供了对血清阳性水平的基本了解。然而,要更好地理解和解释血清阳性率、如何确定血清阳性率以及影响血清阳性率计算的其他因素(即抗体水平),就需要定量的实验室检测数据:从 3 个 NHS 实验室和 20 个 CO-CONNECT 项目合作机构收集了 36 种数据属性。根据对最低数据集的需求对这些数据进行了评估,以确定数据属性的重要性。为评估最低数据标准,对国家医疗服务系统实验室进行了可行性研究,并对国家和国际数据标准及医疗报告进行了文献综述:结果:由 12 个数据属性组成的 COVID 血清学最低数据标准 (CSMDS) 已由 3 个 NHS 实验室创建并验证,以便在全国范围内对 COVID 血清学结果进行细化报告。为支持该标准,还开发了一套标准化词汇,用于表示实验室分析仪系统和实验室信息管理系统:本文提出了 COVID-19 血清学数据属性的最低可行标准,以提高其粒度并加强 COVID-19 血清学实验室结果的全国性报告,这对未来的大流行病具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A SARS-CoV-2 minimum data standard to support national serology reporting.

Background: Healthcare laboratory systems produce and capture a vast array of information, yet do not always report all of this to the national infrastructure within the United Kingdom. The global COVID-19 pandemic brought about a much greater need for detailed healthcare data, one such instance being laboratory testing data. The reporting of qualitative laboratory test results (e.g. positive, negative or indeterminate) provides a basic understanding of levels of seropositivity. However, to better understand and interpret seropositivity, how it is determined and other factors that affect its calculation (i.e. levels of antibodies), quantitative laboratory test data are needed.

Method: 36 data attributes were collected from 3 NHS laboratories and 29 CO-CONNECT project partner organisations. These were assessed against the need for a minimum dataset to determine data attribute importance. An NHS laboratory feasibility study was undertaken to assess the minimum data standard, together with a literature review of national and international data standards and healthcare reports.

Results: A COVID serology minimum data standard (CSMDS) comprising 12 data attributes was created and verified by 3 NHS laboratories to allow national granular reporting of COVID serology results. To support this, a standardised set of vocabulary terms was developed to represent laboratory analyser systems and laboratory information management systems.

Conclusions: This paper puts forward a minimum viable standard for COVID-19 serology data attributes to enhance its granularity and augment the national reporting of COVID-19 serology laboratory results, with implications for future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信