儿科诊断和介入放射学手术镇静和镇痛:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护科学协会 (SIAARTI) 制定的 DELPHI 专家共识文件。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1111/pan.14936
Maria Cristina Mondardini, Stefano Pezzato, Luisa Meneghini, Rino Agostiniani, Alessandro De Cassai, Ignazio D'Errico, Carmelo Minardi, Raffaella Sagredini, Fabio Sbaraglia, Caterina Testoni, Francesco Toni, Milo Vason, Angela Amigoni
{"title":"儿科诊断和介入放射学手术镇静和镇痛:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护科学协会 (SIAARTI) 制定的 DELPHI 专家共识文件。","authors":"Maria Cristina Mondardini, Stefano Pezzato, Luisa Meneghini, Rino Agostiniani, Alessandro De Cassai, Ignazio D'Errico, Carmelo Minardi, Raffaella Sagredini, Fabio Sbaraglia, Caterina Testoni, Francesco Toni, Milo Vason, Angela Amigoni","doi":"10.1111/pan.14936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures often require sedation to achieve immobility and analgesia if the procedure is painful. In the past decades, leading scientific organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in children outside of the operating room. Their recommendations are being applied to procedural sedation in radiology. However, some questions remain open regarding specific aspects contextualized to the radiology setting, such as elective prone sedation, the urgency of the procedure, when venous access or airway protection is required, and others.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To address the unresolved issues of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert panel of pediatricians, pediatric anesthesiologists, intensivists, and neuroradiologists selected topics representative of current controversies and formulated research questions. Statements were developed by reviewing the literature for new evidence, comparing expertise and experience, and expressing opinions. Panelists' agreement with the statements was collected anonymously using the DELPHI method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve evidence-based or expert opinion incorporate are presented, considering risks, benefits, and applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts involved in the field, provides statements to improve the quality of decision-making practice in procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"999-1010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology: An expert DELPHI consensus document developed by the ITALIAN scientific society of anesthesia, analgesia, resuscitation and intensive care (SIAARTI).\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cristina Mondardini, Stefano Pezzato, Luisa Meneghini, Rino Agostiniani, Alessandro De Cassai, Ignazio D'Errico, Carmelo Minardi, Raffaella Sagredini, Fabio Sbaraglia, Caterina Testoni, Francesco Toni, Milo Vason, Angela Amigoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.14936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures often require sedation to achieve immobility and analgesia if the procedure is painful. In the past decades, leading scientific organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in children outside of the operating room. Their recommendations are being applied to procedural sedation in radiology. However, some questions remain open regarding specific aspects contextualized to the radiology setting, such as elective prone sedation, the urgency of the procedure, when venous access or airway protection is required, and others.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To address the unresolved issues of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An expert panel of pediatricians, pediatric anesthesiologists, intensivists, and neuroradiologists selected topics representative of current controversies and formulated research questions. Statements were developed by reviewing the literature for new evidence, comparing expertise and experience, and expressing opinions. Panelists' agreement with the statements was collected anonymously using the DELPHI method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve evidence-based or expert opinion incorporate are presented, considering risks, benefits, and applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts involved in the field, provides statements to improve the quality of decision-making practice in procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric radiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"999-1010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14936\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接受诊断和介入放射学手术的儿童通常需要使用镇静剂来达到固定不动的目的,如果手术疼痛,则需要使用镇痛剂。在过去的几十年里,领先的科学组织已经为手术室外的儿童手术镇静和镇痛制定了循证指南。他们的建议正被应用于放射科的手术镇静。目的:解决儿科诊断和介入放射学手术镇静和镇痛中尚未解决的问题:由儿科医生、儿科麻醉师、重症监护医师和神经放射医师组成的专家小组选择了代表当前争议的主题,并提出了研究问题。通过查阅文献以寻找新的证据、比较专业知识和经验以及发表意见来制定声明。采用 DELPHI 方法匿名收集专家组成员对声明的同意程度:结果:考虑到风险、益处和适用性,提出了 12 项基于证据或专家意见的建议:这份共识文件是由该领域的多学科专家小组制定的,它提供了一些声明,以提高儿科放射科程序性镇静和镇痛的决策实践质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology: An expert DELPHI consensus document developed by the ITALIAN scientific society of anesthesia, analgesia, resuscitation and intensive care (SIAARTI).

Background: Children undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures often require sedation to achieve immobility and analgesia if the procedure is painful. In the past decades, leading scientific organizations have developed evidence-based guidelines for procedural sedation and analgesia in children outside of the operating room. Their recommendations are being applied to procedural sedation in radiology. However, some questions remain open regarding specific aspects contextualized to the radiology setting, such as elective prone sedation, the urgency of the procedure, when venous access or airway protection is required, and others.

Aims: To address the unresolved issues of procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.

Methods: An expert panel of pediatricians, pediatric anesthesiologists, intensivists, and neuroradiologists selected topics representative of current controversies and formulated research questions. Statements were developed by reviewing the literature for new evidence, comparing expertise and experience, and expressing opinions. Panelists' agreement with the statements was collected anonymously using the DELPHI method.

Results: Twelve evidence-based or expert opinion incorporate are presented, considering risks, benefits, and applicability.

Conclusions: This consensus document, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts involved in the field, provides statements to improve the quality of decision-making practice in procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric radiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信