"是癫痫发作吗?预测 1-24 个月大儿童癫痫发作可能性的脑电监测工具,用于监测阵发性、节律性和重复性事件。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1111/epi.18018
Melisa Carrasco, Theresa Estiphan, Harlan McCaffery, Nancy McNamara
{"title":"\"是癫痫发作吗?预测 1-24 个月大儿童癫痫发作可能性的脑电监测工具,用于监测阵发性、节律性和重复性事件。","authors":"Melisa Carrasco,&nbsp;Theresa Estiphan,&nbsp;Harlan McCaffery,&nbsp;Nancy McNamara","doi":"10.1111/epi.18018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Paroxysmal, rhythmic, and repetitive events (PRREs) during infancy can be concerning for possible seizures, especially following perinatal brain injuries. The workup for establishing whether a PRRE represents a seizure involves the use of continuous video-electroencephalography (cVEEG) for event characterization. This study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of cVEEG for evaluating events concerning for seizures in children aged 1–24 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a single-center retrospective chart review (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2020) and included all children aged 1–24 months admitted for PRRE capture and characterization using cVEEG. Chart abstraction included demographics, birth and family history, known brain injury, event semiology, duration, and frequency, as well as interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) features. For each of these variables, odds ratios for seizure prediction were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 243 patients were identified for this study. On cVEEG, <i>n</i> = 160 (65.4%) had a target event of concern captured during an initial admission with cVEEG. Whereas <i>n</i> = 41 (25.8%) patients with events captured were confirmed to have seizures, most patients (<i>n</i> = 119) were confirmed to have nonepileptic events. Several variables predicted seizure likelihood during the initial admission with cVEEG, including event duration (&gt;1 min), frequency (occurring ≥3 times per week), and presence of abnormal interictal findings on cVEEG. For patients who did not receive a diagnosis at the time of initial admission with cVEEG, the likelihood of a subsequent epilepsy diagnosis was associated with specific PRRE semiology (motor active or motor passive), longer event duration (&gt;1 min duration), and the presence of interictal abnormal EEG features on initial cVEEG admission. Prediction tools utilizing scoring systems to stratify risk in infants with suspected seizures due to PRREs are included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Unique patient attributes and PRRE characteristics, as well as the presence of EEG interictal abnormalities, can provide valuable insights for discerning children with a higher likelihood of epilepsy diagnosis following cVEEG admission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Is it a seizure?” Prediction tool for seizure likelihood in children aged 1–24 months admitted for electroencephalographic monitoring of paroxysmal, rhythmic, and repetitive events\",\"authors\":\"Melisa Carrasco,&nbsp;Theresa Estiphan,&nbsp;Harlan McCaffery,&nbsp;Nancy McNamara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Paroxysmal, rhythmic, and repetitive events (PRREs) during infancy can be concerning for possible seizures, especially following perinatal brain injuries. The workup for establishing whether a PRRE represents a seizure involves the use of continuous video-electroencephalography (cVEEG) for event characterization. This study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of cVEEG for evaluating events concerning for seizures in children aged 1–24 months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a single-center retrospective chart review (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2020) and included all children aged 1–24 months admitted for PRRE capture and characterization using cVEEG. Chart abstraction included demographics, birth and family history, known brain injury, event semiology, duration, and frequency, as well as interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) features. For each of these variables, odds ratios for seizure prediction were calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 243 patients were identified for this study. On cVEEG, <i>n</i> = 160 (65.4%) had a target event of concern captured during an initial admission with cVEEG. Whereas <i>n</i> = 41 (25.8%) patients with events captured were confirmed to have seizures, most patients (<i>n</i> = 119) were confirmed to have nonepileptic events. Several variables predicted seizure likelihood during the initial admission with cVEEG, including event duration (&gt;1 min), frequency (occurring ≥3 times per week), and presence of abnormal interictal findings on cVEEG. For patients who did not receive a diagnosis at the time of initial admission with cVEEG, the likelihood of a subsequent epilepsy diagnosis was associated with specific PRRE semiology (motor active or motor passive), longer event duration (&gt;1 min duration), and the presence of interictal abnormal EEG features on initial cVEEG admission. Prediction tools utilizing scoring systems to stratify risk in infants with suspected seizures due to PRREs are included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unique patient attributes and PRRE characteristics, as well as the presence of EEG interictal abnormalities, can provide valuable insights for discerning children with a higher likelihood of epilepsy diagnosis following cVEEG admission.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:婴儿期的阵发性、节律性和重复性事件(PRRE)可能与癫痫发作有关,尤其是围产期脑损伤后。确定 PRRE 是否代表癫痫发作的工作包括使用连续视频脑电图 (cVEEG) 进行事件特征描述。本研究旨在确定 cVEEG 在评估 1-24 个月儿童癫痫发作相关事件时的诊断率:我们进行了一次单中心回顾性病历审查(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日),纳入了所有使用 cVEEG 捕捉和描述 PRRE 的 1-24 个月大儿童。病历摘要包括人口统计学特征、出生史和家族史、已知脑损伤、事件半成品、持续时间和频率以及发作间期脑电图(EEG)特征。针对每个变量,计算了预测癫痫发作的几率比:本研究共确定了 243 名患者。在 cVEEG 中,有 160 人(65.4%)在首次入院时通过 cVEEG 捕捉到了目标事件。有 41 例(25.8%)患者被证实有癫痫发作,而大多数患者(119 例)被证实有非癫痫事件。在使用 cVEEG 的初始入院期间,有几个变量可预测癫痫发作的可能性,包括事件持续时间(>1 分钟)、频率(每周发生次数≥3 次)以及 cVEEG 上是否存在异常发作间期发现。对于最初入院时未接受 cVEEG 诊断的患者,其后续癫痫诊断的可能性与特定的 PRRE 符号学(运动主动或运动被动)、较长的事件持续时间(持续时间大于 1 分钟)以及最初入院时存在发作间期异常 EEG 特征有关。文中还包括利用评分系统对疑因 PRRE 引起癫痫发作的婴儿进行风险分层的预测工具:重要意义:独特的患者属性和 PRRE 特征以及脑电图发作间期异常的存在可提供宝贵的见解,用于在 cVEEG 入院后分辨出更有可能被诊断为癫痫的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

“Is it a seizure?” Prediction tool for seizure likelihood in children aged 1–24 months admitted for electroencephalographic monitoring of paroxysmal, rhythmic, and repetitive events

“Is it a seizure?” Prediction tool for seizure likelihood in children aged 1–24 months admitted for electroencephalographic monitoring of paroxysmal, rhythmic, and repetitive events

Objective

Paroxysmal, rhythmic, and repetitive events (PRREs) during infancy can be concerning for possible seizures, especially following perinatal brain injuries. The workup for establishing whether a PRRE represents a seizure involves the use of continuous video-electroencephalography (cVEEG) for event characterization. This study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of cVEEG for evaluating events concerning for seizures in children aged 1–24 months.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective chart review (January 1, 2019–December 31, 2020) and included all children aged 1–24 months admitted for PRRE capture and characterization using cVEEG. Chart abstraction included demographics, birth and family history, known brain injury, event semiology, duration, and frequency, as well as interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) features. For each of these variables, odds ratios for seizure prediction were calculated.

Results

A total of 243 patients were identified for this study. On cVEEG, n = 160 (65.4%) had a target event of concern captured during an initial admission with cVEEG. Whereas n = 41 (25.8%) patients with events captured were confirmed to have seizures, most patients (n = 119) were confirmed to have nonepileptic events. Several variables predicted seizure likelihood during the initial admission with cVEEG, including event duration (>1 min), frequency (occurring ≥3 times per week), and presence of abnormal interictal findings on cVEEG. For patients who did not receive a diagnosis at the time of initial admission with cVEEG, the likelihood of a subsequent epilepsy diagnosis was associated with specific PRRE semiology (motor active or motor passive), longer event duration (>1 min duration), and the presence of interictal abnormal EEG features on initial cVEEG admission. Prediction tools utilizing scoring systems to stratify risk in infants with suspected seizures due to PRREs are included.

Significance

Unique patient attributes and PRRE characteristics, as well as the presence of EEG interictal abnormalities, can provide valuable insights for discerning children with a higher likelihood of epilepsy diagnosis following cVEEG admission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信