青年期成熟-发病型糖尿病(MODY)中意义不明的变异(VUS):通过 VUS 再分析解决难题的比率很高。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Guido Alarcon, Glenn A Maston, Carol A Hoffman, Jennifer E Posey, Maria Jose Redondo, Mustafa Tosur
{"title":"青年期成熟-发病型糖尿病(MODY)中意义不明的变异(VUS):通过 VUS 再分析解决难题的比率很高。","authors":"Guido Alarcon, Glenn A Maston, Carol A Hoffman, Jennifer E Posey, Maria Jose Redondo, Mustafa Tosur","doi":"10.1159/000539542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the era of next-generation sequencing, clinicians frequently encounter variants of unknown significance (VUS) in genetic testing. VUS may be reclassified over time as genetic knowledge grows. We know little about how best to approach VUS in the maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Therefore, our study aimed to determine the utility of reanalysis of previous VUS results in genetic confirmation of MODY.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective chart review identified 85 subjects with a MODY clinical diagnosis. We reanalyzed genetic testing in 10 subjects with 14 unique VUS on MODY genes that was performed &gt;3 years before the study. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data was collected for those individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reanalysis, 43% (6/14) of the gene variants were reclassified to a different category: 7% (1/14) were \"likely pathogenic\" and 36% (5/14) were \"benign\" or \"likely benign.\" The reclassified pathogenic variant was in HNF1A and all reclassified benign variants were in HNF1A, HNF1B and PDX1. The median time between MODY testing and reclassification was 8 years (range: 4-10 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In sum, iterative reanalyzing the genetic data from VUS found during MODY testing may provide high-yield diagnostic information. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal time and frequency for such analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":13025,"journal":{"name":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variants of Unknown Significance in Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: High Rate of Conundrum Resolution via Variants of Unknown Significance Reanalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guido Alarcon, Glenn A Maston, Carol A Hoffman, Jennifer E Posey, Maria Jose Redondo, Mustafa Tosur\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the era of next-generation sequencing, clinicians frequently encounter variants of unknown significance (VUS) in genetic testing. VUS may be reclassified over time as genetic knowledge grows. We know little about how best to approach VUS in the maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Therefore, our study aimed to determine the utility of reanalysis of previous VUS results in genetic confirmation of MODY.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective chart review identified 85 subjects with a MODY clinical diagnosis. We reanalyzed genetic testing in 10 subjects with 14 unique VUS on MODY genes that was performed &gt;3 years before the study. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data was collected for those individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After reanalysis, 43% (6/14) of the gene variants were reclassified to a different category: 7% (1/14) were \\\"likely pathogenic\\\" and 36% (5/14) were \\\"benign\\\" or \\\"likely benign.\\\" The reclassified pathogenic variant was in HNF1A and all reclassified benign variants were in HNF1A, HNF1B and PDX1. The median time between MODY testing and reclassification was 8 years (range: 4-10 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In sum, iterative reanalyzing the genetic data from VUS found during MODY testing may provide high-yield diagnostic information. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal time and frequency for such analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormone Research in Paediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormone Research in Paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539542\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在新一代测序时代,临床医生在基因检测中经常会遇到意义不明的变异体(VUS)。随着基因知识的增长,VUS 可能会被重新分类。我们对如何更好地处理年轻成熟型糖尿病(MODY)的 VUS 知之甚少。因此,我们的研究旨在确定重新分析之前的 VUS 结果对 MODY 基因确认的效用:方法:通过单中心回顾性病历审查确定了 85 例临床诊断为 MODY 的受试者。我们重新分析了 10 名受试者的基因检测结果,其中有 14 个独特的 MODY 基因 VUS,这些基因检测是在研究前 3 年进行的。我们收集了这些人的人口统计学、临床和生化数据。结果 经过重新分析,43%(6/14)的基因变异被重新归类为不同的类别:7%(1/14)为 "可能致病",36%(5/14)为 "良性 "或 "可能良性"。重新分类的致病变异位于 HNF1A,所有重新分类的良性变异位于 HNF1A、HNF1B 和 PDX1。从 MODY 检测到重新分类的中位时间为 8 年(范围:4-10 年):总之,对 MODY 检测中发现的 VUS 基因数据进行迭代再分析可提供高产的诊断信息。为确定此类分析的最佳时间和频率,有必要开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variants of Unknown Significance in Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: High Rate of Conundrum Resolution via Variants of Unknown Significance Reanalysis.

Introduction: In the era of next-generation sequencing, clinicians frequently encounter variants of unknown significance (VUS) in genetic testing. VUS may be reclassified over time as genetic knowledge grows. We know little about how best to approach VUS in the maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Therefore, our study aimed to determine the utility of reanalysis of previous VUS results in genetic confirmation of MODY.

Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review identified 85 subjects with a MODY clinical diagnosis. We reanalyzed genetic testing in 10 subjects with 14 unique VUS on MODY genes that was performed >3 years before the study. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data was collected for those individuals.

Results: After reanalysis, 43% (6/14) of the gene variants were reclassified to a different category: 7% (1/14) were "likely pathogenic" and 36% (5/14) were "benign" or "likely benign." The reclassified pathogenic variant was in HNF1A and all reclassified benign variants were in HNF1A, HNF1B and PDX1. The median time between MODY testing and reclassification was 8 years (range: 4-10 years).

Conclusion: In sum, iterative reanalyzing the genetic data from VUS found during MODY testing may provide high-yield diagnostic information. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal time and frequency for such analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hormone Research in Paediatrics
Hormone Research in Paediatrics ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of ''Hormone Research in Paediatrics'' is to improve the care of children with endocrine disorders by promoting basic and clinical knowledge. The journal facilitates the dissemination of information through original papers, mini reviews, clinical guidelines and papers on novel insights from clinical practice. Periodic editorials from outstanding paediatric endocrinologists address the main published novelties by critically reviewing the major strengths and weaknesses of the studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信