Kamala Adhikari, Sharon S Mah, Michelle Patterson, Gary F Teare, Kimberly Manalili
{"title":"在艾伯塔省初级保健诊所实施多成分干预措施以改善粪便免疫化学检验 (FIT) 大肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Kamala Adhikari, Sharon S Mah, Michelle Patterson, Gary F Teare, Kimberly Manalili","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective at reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC. To address suboptimal CRC screening rates, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) multicomponent intervention was piloted in four urban multidisciplinary primary care clinics in Alberta from September 2021 to April 2022. The interventions included in-clinic distribution of FIT kits, along with FIT-related patient education and follow-up. This study explored barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention in four primary clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth qualitative semistructured key informant interviews, guided by the CFIR, were conducted with 14 participants to understand barriers and facilitators of the FIT intervention implementation. Key informants were physicians, quality improvement facilitators and clinical staff. Interviews were analysed following an inductive-deductive approach. Implementation barriers and facilitators were organised and interpreted using the CFIR to facilitate the identification of strategies to mitigate barriers and leverage facilitators for implementation at the clinic level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key implementation facilitators reported by participants were patient perceived needs being met; the clinics' readiness to implement FIT, including staff's motivation, skills, knowledge, and resources to implement; intervention characteristics-evidence-based, adaptable and compatible with existing workflows; regular staff communications; and use of the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Key barriers to implementation were patient's limited awareness of FIT screening for CRC and discomfort with stool sample collection; the impacts of COVID-19 (patients missed appointment, staff coordination and communication were limited due to remote work); and limited clinic capacity (knowledge and skills using EMR system, staff turnover and shortage).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from the study facilitate the refinement and adaption of future FIT intervention implementation. Future research will explore implementation barriers and facilitators in rural settings and from patients' perspectives to enhance the spread and scale of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators of implementing a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics, Alberta.\",\"authors\":\"Kamala Adhikari, Sharon S Mah, Michelle Patterson, Gary F Teare, Kimberly Manalili\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective at reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC. To address suboptimal CRC screening rates, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) multicomponent intervention was piloted in four urban multidisciplinary primary care clinics in Alberta from September 2021 to April 2022. The interventions included in-clinic distribution of FIT kits, along with FIT-related patient education and follow-up. This study explored barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention in four primary clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth qualitative semistructured key informant interviews, guided by the CFIR, were conducted with 14 participants to understand barriers and facilitators of the FIT intervention implementation. Key informants were physicians, quality improvement facilitators and clinical staff. Interviews were analysed following an inductive-deductive approach. Implementation barriers and facilitators were organised and interpreted using the CFIR to facilitate the identification of strategies to mitigate barriers and leverage facilitators for implementation at the clinic level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key implementation facilitators reported by participants were patient perceived needs being met; the clinics' readiness to implement FIT, including staff's motivation, skills, knowledge, and resources to implement; intervention characteristics-evidence-based, adaptable and compatible with existing workflows; regular staff communications; and use of the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Key barriers to implementation were patient's limited awareness of FIT screening for CRC and discomfort with stool sample collection; the impacts of COVID-19 (patients missed appointment, staff coordination and communication were limited due to remote work); and limited clinic capacity (knowledge and skills using EMR system, staff turnover and shortage).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from the study facilitate the refinement and adaption of future FIT intervention implementation. Future research will explore implementation barriers and facilitators in rural settings and from patients' perspectives to enhance the spread and scale of the intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11131116/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:大肠癌(CRC)筛查可有效降低 CRC 的发病率和死亡率。为解决 CRC 筛查率不理想的问题,2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 4 月期间,艾伯塔省在四个城市多学科初级保健诊所试行了粪便免疫化学检验 (FIT) 多成分干预措施。干预措施包括在诊所内分发 FIT 套件,以及与 FIT 相关的患者教育和随访。本研究采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)探讨了在四家初级诊所实施干预措施的障碍和促进因素:方法:在 CFIR 的指导下,对 14 名参与者进行了深入的半结构式定性关键信息提供者访谈,以了解实施 FIT 干预的障碍和促进因素。关键信息提供者包括医生、质量改进促进者和临床工作人员。访谈采用归纳-演绎法进行分析。使用CFIR对实施障碍和促进因素进行了整理和解释,以帮助确定在诊所层面上减少实施障碍和利用促进因素的策略:参与者报告的主要实施促进因素包括:患者感知到的需求得到满足;诊所做好了实施 FIT 的准备,包括员工的实施动机、技能、知识和资源;干预措施的特点--以证据为基础、适应性强且与现有工作流程兼容;员工定期沟通;以及使用电子病历(EMR)系统。实施的主要障碍包括:患者对 FIT 筛查 CRC 的认识有限以及对粪便样本采集的不适感;COVID-19 的影响(患者错过预约时间、由于远程工作,员工的协调和沟通受到限制);以及诊所能力有限(使用 EMR 系统的知识和技能、员工流失和短缺):研究结果有助于改进和调整未来 FIT 干预措施的实施。未来的研究将从患者的角度探讨在农村环境中实施 FIT 的障碍和促进因素,以扩大干预措施的传播范围和规模。
Barriers and facilitators of implementing a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics, Alberta.
Background and objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective at reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC. To address suboptimal CRC screening rates, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) multicomponent intervention was piloted in four urban multidisciplinary primary care clinics in Alberta from September 2021 to April 2022. The interventions included in-clinic distribution of FIT kits, along with FIT-related patient education and follow-up. This study explored barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention in four primary clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Methods: In-depth qualitative semistructured key informant interviews, guided by the CFIR, were conducted with 14 participants to understand barriers and facilitators of the FIT intervention implementation. Key informants were physicians, quality improvement facilitators and clinical staff. Interviews were analysed following an inductive-deductive approach. Implementation barriers and facilitators were organised and interpreted using the CFIR to facilitate the identification of strategies to mitigate barriers and leverage facilitators for implementation at the clinic level.
Results: Key implementation facilitators reported by participants were patient perceived needs being met; the clinics' readiness to implement FIT, including staff's motivation, skills, knowledge, and resources to implement; intervention characteristics-evidence-based, adaptable and compatible with existing workflows; regular staff communications; and use of the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Key barriers to implementation were patient's limited awareness of FIT screening for CRC and discomfort with stool sample collection; the impacts of COVID-19 (patients missed appointment, staff coordination and communication were limited due to remote work); and limited clinic capacity (knowledge and skills using EMR system, staff turnover and shortage).
Conclusion: Findings from the study facilitate the refinement and adaption of future FIT intervention implementation. Future research will explore implementation barriers and facilitators in rural settings and from patients' perspectives to enhance the spread and scale of the intervention.