急诊科老年患者的多维虚弱:揭示社会虚弱的普遍性和重要性。

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00717-0
Yu-Chieh Tsai, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Chien-Hua Huang, Ya-Mei Chen
{"title":"急诊科老年患者的多维虚弱:揭示社会虚弱的普遍性和重要性。","authors":"Yu-Chieh Tsai, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Chien-Hua Huang, Ya-Mei Chen","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00717-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors of physical, psychological, and social frailty among older adults in the emergency department, comparing these data with community population to understand emergency setting manifestations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted at the Emergency Department of National Taiwan University BioMedical Park Hospital, this prospective observational cohort study enrolled older adult patients over a three-month period. Frailty assessments included the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures scale for physical frailty, the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for psychological frailty, and the Makizako Social Frailty Index for social frailty. Data analysis involved a multivariable logistic model to determine the risk factors associated with each frailty type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 991 older adult individuals seeking medical care, 207 participated in the study. The study found high prevalence rates of frailty: 46.38% for physical, 41.06% for psychological, and 48.79% for social frailty. Risk factors for frailty included older age and a history of falls. Interestingly, the prevalence of social frailty was notably higher than physical and psychological frailty. Gender and polypharmacy showed no significant association with any frailty type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research reveals high physical, psychological, and social frailty among older ED patients, especially noting social frailty's prevalence. It highlights the importance for emergency care to adopt holistic care strategies that address older adults' multifaceted health challenges, suggesting a paradigm shift in current healthcare practices to better cater to the multifaceted needs of this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"549-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional frailty in elderly emergency department patients: unveiling the prevalence and significance of social frailty.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chieh Tsai, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Chien-Hua Huang, Ya-Mei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-024-00717-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors of physical, psychological, and social frailty among older adults in the emergency department, comparing these data with community population to understand emergency setting manifestations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted at the Emergency Department of National Taiwan University BioMedical Park Hospital, this prospective observational cohort study enrolled older adult patients over a three-month period. Frailty assessments included the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures scale for physical frailty, the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for psychological frailty, and the Makizako Social Frailty Index for social frailty. Data analysis involved a multivariable logistic model to determine the risk factors associated with each frailty type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 991 older adult individuals seeking medical care, 207 participated in the study. The study found high prevalence rates of frailty: 46.38% for physical, 41.06% for psychological, and 48.79% for social frailty. Risk factors for frailty included older age and a history of falls. Interestingly, the prevalence of social frailty was notably higher than physical and psychological frailty. Gender and polypharmacy showed no significant association with any frailty type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research reveals high physical, psychological, and social frailty among older ED patients, especially noting social frailty's prevalence. It highlights the importance for emergency care to adopt holistic care strategies that address older adults' multifaceted health challenges, suggesting a paradigm shift in current healthcare practices to better cater to the multifaceted needs of this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"549-553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00717-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00717-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估急诊科中老年人身体、心理和社会脆弱性的发生率和因素,并将这些数据与社区人群进行比较,以了解急诊环境中的表现:这项前瞻性观察性队列研究在台湾大学生物医学园区医院急诊科进行,共招募了三个月的老年患者。虚弱评估包括针对身体虚弱的骨质疏松性骨折研究量表、针对心理虚弱的蒂尔堡虚弱指标以及针对社会虚弱的牧座子社会虚弱指数。数据分析采用多变量逻辑模型,以确定与每种虚弱类型相关的风险因素:在 991 名就医的老年人中,有 207 人参与了研究。研究发现,身体虚弱的发生率很高:身体虚弱占 46.38%,心理脆弱占 41.06%,社交脆弱占 48.79%。体弱的风险因素包括年龄偏大和跌倒史。有趣的是,社交脆弱的发生率明显高于身体和心理脆弱。性别和多重药物治疗与任何一种虚弱类型都没有明显关联:这项研究揭示了急诊室老年患者在身体、心理和社交方面的脆弱性,尤其是社交脆弱性的普遍性。它强调了急诊护理采取整体护理策略以应对老年人多方面健康挑战的重要性,并建议转变当前的医疗保健实践模式,以更好地满足这一弱势群体的多方面需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidimensional frailty in elderly emergency department patients: unveiling the prevalence and significance of social frailty.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors of physical, psychological, and social frailty among older adults in the emergency department, comparing these data with community population to understand emergency setting manifestations.

Methods: Conducted at the Emergency Department of National Taiwan University BioMedical Park Hospital, this prospective observational cohort study enrolled older adult patients over a three-month period. Frailty assessments included the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures scale for physical frailty, the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for psychological frailty, and the Makizako Social Frailty Index for social frailty. Data analysis involved a multivariable logistic model to determine the risk factors associated with each frailty type.

Results: Out of 991 older adult individuals seeking medical care, 207 participated in the study. The study found high prevalence rates of frailty: 46.38% for physical, 41.06% for psychological, and 48.79% for social frailty. Risk factors for frailty included older age and a history of falls. Interestingly, the prevalence of social frailty was notably higher than physical and psychological frailty. Gender and polypharmacy showed no significant association with any frailty type.

Conclusion: This research reveals high physical, psychological, and social frailty among older ED patients, especially noting social frailty's prevalence. It highlights the importance for emergency care to adopt holistic care strategies that address older adults' multifaceted health challenges, suggesting a paradigm shift in current healthcare practices to better cater to the multifaceted needs of this vulnerable population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信