召唤未来:乔伊斯与缺席的弥赛亚主义

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES
Jack Rodgers
{"title":"召唤未来:乔伊斯与缺席的弥赛亚主义","authors":"Jack Rodgers","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2023.a927908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Ulysses</i> is so saturated with ruined futurities, false prophets, and parodic messiahs that we might be tempted to conclude that there is no place at all for an ethical or unironic future. However, this essay argues that Joyce is, in fact, invested in a kind of messianic futurity which emerges out of, rather than in opposition to, catastrophe and negativity. Beginning with an examination of the various political and religious broken promises that permeate the novel, I argue that the real temporal commitments in <i>Ulysses</i> are rooted not in what is said but what is unsaid and unsayable—the moments of blindness and absence that emerge in pivotal moments throughout the text. Ultimately, it is through Joyce's use of the figures of both Moses and the prophet Elijah that a radical temporality is best developed, culminating in Molly Bloom's comments on \"omission\" in \"Penelope\" and the articulation of an affirmative negation which confronts us with an ethical command to participate in calling forth the future.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calling Forth the Future: Joyce and the Messianism of Absence\",\"authors\":\"Jack Rodgers\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjq.2023.a927908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Ulysses</i> is so saturated with ruined futurities, false prophets, and parodic messiahs that we might be tempted to conclude that there is no place at all for an ethical or unironic future. However, this essay argues that Joyce is, in fact, invested in a kind of messianic futurity which emerges out of, rather than in opposition to, catastrophe and negativity. Beginning with an examination of the various political and religious broken promises that permeate the novel, I argue that the real temporal commitments in <i>Ulysses</i> are rooted not in what is said but what is unsaid and unsayable—the moments of blindness and absence that emerge in pivotal moments throughout the text. Ultimately, it is through Joyce's use of the figures of both Moses and the prophet Elijah that a radical temporality is best developed, culminating in Molly Bloom's comments on \\\"omission\\\" in \\\"Penelope\\\" and the articulation of an affirmative negation which confronts us with an ethical command to participate in calling forth the future.</p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a927908\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2023.a927908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尤利西斯》中充斥着毁灭的未来、虚假的先知和模仿的救世主,以至于我们可能会得出这样的结论:伦理的或非讽刺的未来根本不存在。然而,这篇文章认为,乔伊斯的作品中其实蕴含着一种救世主式的未来感,这种未来感产生于灾难和消极,而不是与之对立。从对贯穿小说的各种政治和宗教失信的审视开始,我认为《尤利西斯》中真正的时间承诺并非植根于所说的,而是植根于未说和不可说的--在全文关键时刻出现的盲目和缺席的时刻。最终,正是通过乔伊斯对摩西和先知以利亚形象的使用,激进的时间性才得到了最好的发展,并在《珀涅罗佩》中以莫莉-布鲁姆对 "遗漏 "的评论和肯定之否定的表述达到了顶峰,使我们面临着参与呼唤未来的伦理命令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calling Forth the Future: Joyce and the Messianism of Absence

Ulysses is so saturated with ruined futurities, false prophets, and parodic messiahs that we might be tempted to conclude that there is no place at all for an ethical or unironic future. However, this essay argues that Joyce is, in fact, invested in a kind of messianic futurity which emerges out of, rather than in opposition to, catastrophe and negativity. Beginning with an examination of the various political and religious broken promises that permeate the novel, I argue that the real temporal commitments in Ulysses are rooted not in what is said but what is unsaid and unsayable—the moments of blindness and absence that emerge in pivotal moments throughout the text. Ultimately, it is through Joyce's use of the figures of both Moses and the prophet Elijah that a radical temporality is best developed, culminating in Molly Bloom's comments on "omission" in "Penelope" and the articulation of an affirmative negation which confronts us with an ethical command to participate in calling forth the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY
JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信