BA 诉国王和家庭法

IF 1.2 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Current Issues in Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416

Chris Martin

{"title":"BA 诉国王和家庭法","authors":"Chris Martin","doi":"10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...","PeriodicalId":43272,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BA v The King and the law of home\",\"authors\":\"Chris Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2345416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在 BA v The King 一案中，高等法院以多数票裁定，在一名男子踢倒房门并殴打其前伴侣的情况下，不构成破门而入罪，因为该男子当时仍...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

BA v The King and the law of home

In BA v The King the High Court decided, by majority, that the offence of breaking and entering did not lie where a man kicked down a door and assaulted his former partner, because the man was stil...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current Issues in Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

5.30%

发文量