Liubov Ermolaeva, Andrei Panibratov, Desislava Dikova
{"title":"小心傀儡:地缘政治在与俄罗斯有政治联系的跨国公司和黑山之间讨价还价动态中的作用","authors":"Liubov Ermolaeva, Andrei Panibratov, Desislava Dikova","doi":"10.1108/mbr-01-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to use the obsolescing bargaining power (OBP) Model (Vernon, 1977, 1998) to analyze the case of United Company Rusal, a Russian politically connected multinational companies (MNCs) that was one of the world’s largest aluminum companies between 2005 and 2014, having acquired and, ultimately, sold the Montenegrin aluminum smelter company Kombinat aluminijuma Podgorica.The authors did so with the aim of answering the following question: How do geopolitics affect the bargaining balance of power between a Russian MNC and a host country?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3> Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors used the discourse analysis methodology to identify the key players in the bargaining process and illustrate the evolving bargaining process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors demonstrated that, over time, the shift in power from the Russian MNC to the host government had not merely been the result of the increase in committed MNC assets in the host country but, rather, of a geopolitical chess game involving the Russian Government, North Atlantic treaty organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU). By extending the OBP model with geopolitics, the authors found that a political agenda can influence the outcome of a bargaining process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors extended the OBP model to illustrate the complex interaction between an emerging market MNC and an emerging host country government, indirectly influenced by two supranational organizations – the EU and NATO.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46630,"journal":{"name":"Multinational Business Review","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beware the puppeteers: the role of geopolitics in the bargaining dynamics between a Russian politically connected MNC and the country of Montenegro\",\"authors\":\"Liubov Ermolaeva, Andrei Panibratov, Desislava Dikova\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mbr-01-2023-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to use the obsolescing bargaining power (OBP) Model (Vernon, 1977, 1998) to analyze the case of United Company Rusal, a Russian politically connected multinational companies (MNCs) that was one of the world’s largest aluminum companies between 2005 and 2014, having acquired and, ultimately, sold the Montenegrin aluminum smelter company Kombinat aluminijuma Podgorica.The authors did so with the aim of answering the following question: How do geopolitics affect the bargaining balance of power between a Russian MNC and a host country?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3> Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors used the discourse analysis methodology to identify the key players in the bargaining process and illustrate the evolving bargaining process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The authors demonstrated that, over time, the shift in power from the Russian MNC to the host government had not merely been the result of the increase in committed MNC assets in the host country but, rather, of a geopolitical chess game involving the Russian Government, North Atlantic treaty organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU). By extending the OBP model with geopolitics, the authors found that a political agenda can influence the outcome of a bargaining process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The authors extended the OBP model to illustrate the complex interaction between an emerging market MNC and an emerging host country government, indirectly influenced by two supranational organizations – the EU and NATO.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multinational Business Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multinational Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-01-2023-0008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbr-01-2023-0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 本文旨在使用陈旧议价能力(OBP)模型(Vernon,1977,1998)分析俄罗斯联合公司(United Company Rusal)的案例,该公司是一家与政治有关联的俄罗斯跨国公司(MNCs),在2005年至2014年期间是世界上最大的铝业公司之一,收购并最终出售了黑山铝冶炼厂公司Kombinat aluminijuma Podgorica:作者这样做是为了回答以下问题:地缘政治如何影响俄罗斯跨国公司与东道国之间讨价还价的力量平衡?研究结果作者证明,随着时间的推移,俄罗斯跨国公司向东道国政府的权力转移不仅仅是跨国公司在东道国承诺资产增加的结果,而是俄罗斯政府、北大西洋公约组织(北约)和欧洲联盟(欧盟)参与的地缘政治棋局的结果。作者通过扩展 OBP 模型与地缘政治,发现政治议程可以影响讨价还价过程的结果。原创性/价值作者扩展了 OBP 模型,以说明新兴市场跨国公司与新兴东道国政府之间复杂的互动关系,这种互动关系受到两个超国家组织--欧盟和北约--的间接影响。
Beware the puppeteers: the role of geopolitics in the bargaining dynamics between a Russian politically connected MNC and the country of Montenegro
Purpose
This paper aims to use the obsolescing bargaining power (OBP) Model (Vernon, 1977, 1998) to analyze the case of United Company Rusal, a Russian politically connected multinational companies (MNCs) that was one of the world’s largest aluminum companies between 2005 and 2014, having acquired and, ultimately, sold the Montenegrin aluminum smelter company Kombinat aluminijuma Podgorica.The authors did so with the aim of answering the following question: How do geopolitics affect the bargaining balance of power between a Russian MNC and a host country?
Design/methodology/approach
The authors used the discourse analysis methodology to identify the key players in the bargaining process and illustrate the evolving bargaining process.
Findings
The authors demonstrated that, over time, the shift in power from the Russian MNC to the host government had not merely been the result of the increase in committed MNC assets in the host country but, rather, of a geopolitical chess game involving the Russian Government, North Atlantic treaty organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU). By extending the OBP model with geopolitics, the authors found that a political agenda can influence the outcome of a bargaining process.
Originality/value
The authors extended the OBP model to illustrate the complex interaction between an emerging market MNC and an emerging host country government, indirectly influenced by two supranational organizations – the EU and NATO.
期刊介绍:
Multinational Business Review publishes high quality and innovative peer-review research on the strategy, organization and performance of multinational enterprise (MNE), international business history, geography of international business, and the impact of international business on economic growth and development. The journal encourages papers that are cross-disciplinary in nature, and that address new and important issues in international business. Multinational Business Review also promotes research on under-represented regions such as Africa, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, and South East Asia and their MNEs, as well as under-studied topics such as the role of trade, investment and other public policies. Specific topics of interest include innovation and entrepreneurship in an international context; corporate governance and ownership; social, environmental and political risk; the role of multilateral institutions; and the nature of emerging market multinationals. The title seeks strong conceptual studies, contributing to the advancement of theories and frameworks, and sound empirical work, whether qualitative or quantitative, suggesting managerial, economic or government policy recommendations. The journal encourages replication studies that contribute to our understanding of the reliability and validity of current knowledge. Finally, Multinational Business Review welcomes proposals for perspectives pieces that offer critical and challenging viewpoints; surveys of the literature particularly those that use new and innovative bibliometric methods; and special issues on topics of relevance to Multinational Business Review.